Quote:
Originally Posted by smap
Right but (and I'm 100% not sure here) I think people are expecting most of their traffic to come from pinging the aggregators vs. organic search engine traffic?
|
yeah so its no problem at all, using summaries
I meant that, regarding duplicate content, it doesn't matter if you use summaries or full articles, maybe summaries are even better than whole articles, since google might threat it as something like a citation from another page (if you write abouta specific thing).
But therefore I think the quoted text needs to be surrounded by some other unique text.
ngrams are subparts of text that are meaningful, and google uses this to analyze a text. They have statistics for those ngrams which are evaluated.
So for example a text like "to be or not" is more likely to be real (and has a higher probability) as oposed to something like "to b3 0r n0t"
But I don't really know how google checks for duplicate content, which is actually a point I'm missing all over the SEO forums. There are lots of recommandations and stuff like "you should not", "never use".. but most of the time there is no real base for it, so its really hard to say what actually makes sense or not.