View Single Post
Old 11-02-2008, 08:30 PM   #64 (permalink)
tweak50
.NET/PHP dabbler
 
tweak50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 407
iTrader: 0 / 0%
tweak50 has a reputation beyond reputetweak50 has a reputation beyond reputetweak50 has a reputation beyond reputetweak50 has a reputation beyond reputetweak50 has a reputation beyond reputetweak50 has a reputation beyond reputetweak50 has a reputation beyond reputetweak50 has a reputation beyond reputetweak50 has a reputation beyond reputetweak50 has a reputation beyond reputetweak50 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusky View Post
Apparently Darwin didn't think it was nonsense. So here's a letter from Darwin to Pasteur.

"In a letter to Joseph Dalton Hooker on February 1, 1871, Charles Darwin addressed the question, suggesting that the original spark of life may have begun in a "warm little pond, with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, lights, heat, electricity, etc. present, so that a protein compound was chemically formed ready to undergo still more complex changes". He went on to explain that "at the present day such matter would be instantly devoured or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed."

Famous quote of Louis Pasteur.
"The more I know, the more nearly is my faith that of the Breton peasant. Could I but know all I would have the faith of a Breton peasant's wife."

Pasteur is in the 100 most influential people of human history.
This post makes no sense. First, the letter is addressed to Joseph Hooker, not Pasteur. Your first quoted segment does not support your theory, and the second quoted statement has nothing to do with anything.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by subigo to popeye View Post
I hope he takes all of your money and uses it to fund abortions.
tweak50 is offline