Quote:
Originally Posted by dooogen
I didn't get to see the vid before it got taken down but from the other videos i've seen from the game I'm pretty sure world at war has more blood in it.
and yeah, PC gamers won't be buying this because of the forced matchmaking.
But for us Xboxers/PS3 peeps its gonna be fucking awesome.
(I feel bad for the PC gamers though, they really got screwed)
|
Nah, the beginning was pretty bloody. There was like people crawling on the ground and shit. Like, people were trying to help other people who get shot and shit. It was pretty intense.
But, quite frankly, if this was solely a PC game, the reviews wouldn't be as high, because PC games are used to this sort of standard of FPS
(Crysis, HL/HL2/Deus Ex/QuakeWorld/TF1 and 2/Stalker, Far Cry, F.e.a.r, Doom1,2, Enemy Territory, vcod, cod2, Quake 3, Battlefield 1942, BF2, Postal, PlanetSide, System Shock, UT 99/2004, Tribes 2, Rainbow Six, Return to Castle Wolfenstein, Counter-Strike, Marathon);
console gamers really just have Halo and Goldeneye/Perfect Dark to be honest.
The PS3 doesn't really have a strong FPS (KZ1/2,Haze,Resistance, aren't really that good) besides cod4,WaW, and mw2.
Because of the nature of the controls, every fps for console is significantly slower than on PC, and most, if not all of them have to include options for aiming assistance
I'd like to add that this video is also worse than what was in MW2, but you didn't see that many people (if anyone) complain about it.