|
|||||||
| Industry News We are the first to have streaming news feeds where you can get content for your blogs about reported news stories directly effecting the webmaster industry. |
|
Welcome to the WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum - Internet Marketing Webmaster SEO Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| View Poll Results: How do you feel about the possibility of a facebook search engine | |||
| mo money |
|
43 | 57.33% |
| mo problems |
|
22 | 29.33% |
| Scared |
|
10 | 13.33% |
| Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Prediction: Facebook Will Enter the Search Market Next Year | TechCrunch
So now we are gonna have to figure out how to rule the new facebook search engine anyone have any ideas? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Jerk Off
|
Good share here...I enjoyed reading it.
Will be interesting to see what unravels, but I have a hard time at the moment seeing Facebook having a search as good as big G. But you never know, and it will be utterly ridiculous if Facebook can control the biggest share of social media users as well as a big piece of the search pie as well. Now that is world domination and that scares me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Yeah it's for sure not something we need to worry about today or tomorrow. But I like to try and stay a few steps ahead and prepare for the inevitable. I would like to hear some more opinions on the likelihood of this or something like this actually happening.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
|
That is really interesting. So let me get this straight Google is trying to enter the social space and the Facebook is trying to become a search engine as well? Haha gotta love the tech companies.
But with sucha bigass user base it definitely makes sense for facebook to enter the search space and as he mentioned in the post become the ultimate homepage since people login to facebook everyday in any case. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
is this real? yeah i heard some prediction on this but then still Google will dominate the search engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Ice Man
|
I actually wrote a blog post about this like a year ago addressing this.
Facebook can easily enter the search market but the problem comes down to their ability to sift through the garbage. Facebook will have to throw billions into their search business to compete with google. The problem is FB hasn't been very good at deviating at what they do best, Facebook. I think fb has the power to strongly compete and take a large portion of search marketshare 10-15% relatively quickly from a marketing perspective. The issue is do they want to tackle one of the largest tech companies in the world or go after more low hanging fruit first? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
Just like Google is taking the social sharing, G+ votes and such stuff into consideration lately, as they mentioned in the strategy, Facebook too might take the FB likes and shares in a big way. And I am not able to get it, how would a social network search be called so important when compared to something like Google, Live etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Designs Speak
|
There is no way they gonna be able to complete google when it comes to search engine.
I am assuming facebook might team up with Bing.
__________________
** [1000mbps] Deadly Windows VPS For SEO Softwares. You can't afford to missout this one ** **CLICK HERE**
Looking for a Logo/Banner/Header/PSDWebDesign/Icons/Buttons/ecover/Sales pages layout ? PM ME |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
I doing really well with google right now, panda or no panda, and all my LOCAL clients are at at the top or close. So I am a little scared of the possibility of having to learn to game a new system. But there is also opportunity there. I think the chances of this happening are pretty good. The idea that search would be based on what your groups and connections are doing would actually be very benificial to the end user. In the end this could lead to a huge shift in seo. If Facebook somehow figures out a way to do this then you know google will be making serious changes to it's algo, which is never good. The idea that google now has a somewhat decent social platform definitely points this way.
Anyways only time will tell. Thanks for all the good comments, back to work. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Score 1 for Google: Facebook vs. Google +
Looks like Google may be gaining some ground in this fight. Which is a good thing as far as I am concerned. What do you guys think? |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
my logic here is that google must be slightly concerned that Facebook is going to make a run at what google does best, search, because they are going after what facebook does best: social. If the threat of Facebook search didn't bother google at all I dont think they would even be thinking about the social arena. Thats just my feelings? Anyone else agree with this logic? Disagree? Let me know
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Paid Member
|
i would like to say it would really give Googles local business/places/maps a run for the money - but with Google Earth/GPS/fuckingeverymobiledevicecintegratedwithit there is no way. they would be better off starting from scratch with a new indexing system an algorith.
maybe a local biz search engine that did not allow directores, and limited domains to having 30 pages per domain. i would LOVE to see who came up on top |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
I forget the actual number, but I've read that a ridiculous percentage of articles read on the internet are through people clicking on their friends' FB posts. I think facebook could find a way to make a huge dent in search considering they have a whole bunch social connection information to use that is completely hidden from Google
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Trustworthy Newbie
|
They will put up a search engine have no doubt about it.
It's a top-down culture in a company run by a doofus, where techs are asked to implement things based on decisions made by morons. That and the rush (as a knee-jerk response to Google indexing it) will likely ensure it'll be, um, ur, continue to be a viable market for independents. But what do I actually know? - I basing that on recruitment and development rumours, some knowledge of what Google is doing, some comments made by money people about Facebook's finances - and some extrapolations I plucked out of my arse. Like - MySpace and Facebook, different dogs - same leg action. I'm much more interested in Google+. Much smaller audience, harder to reach, not as impulsive at purchasing - but they've much more money. When I say smaller audience - Google+ is mostly real people, most of Facebook is bullshit and I'm not just talking about the accounts for fictional characters. I'd be more concerned about how soon the Facebook bubble is going to burst, than a Facebook search engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
can't wait for the day that this happens.
To all those people saying Google is so far ahead? wtf are you kidding me, and your here posting on a seo forum. Google is the most retarded outdated peice of crap ever. 1. Authority based on backlinks? Sure back in 2000 when everyone was blogging backlinks could determine a sites buzz and popularity, it's 2011 now, the general population don't blog they use Facebook. Facebook could build a far more accurate search engine by analysing trending topics / urls / websites in it's social data which Facebook denied google access to. Most, if not all the sites that are ranking these days are sites that have been well SEOed not sites which are popular. 2. Ranking based on anchor text? Yea right, even if a site is popular in a niche, other webmasters are not going to naturally link to the site with anchor text like "buy TV", again sites which are ranking for money terms = SEOed sites. google = stinking fail search engine, but nothing better to use atm. Go facebook! |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) |
|
between her boobs
|
Is it just me.... or most of these replies seem made by some autoposting software?
__________________
Author of Heptagrama. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) | |
|
Just Sayin..
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Zynga Pulling Away From Facebook | conv3rsion | Shooting The Shit | 34 | 11-22-2011 05:14 PM |
| TOP SAFEST & FASTEST REAL Human Facebook Fans / Likes in the World ! 1,000 fans = $20 | buswin | Sell, Buy & Trade | 30 | 08-06-2011 12:08 PM |
| Facebook in Privacy Breach Top-Ranked Applications Transmit Personal IDs... | chipmunk | Affiliate Marketing | 0 | 10-18-2010 01:24 PM |
| Facebook removes Microsoft banner ads from site | Firelead | Affiliate Marketing | 2 | 02-07-2010 08:28 PM |
| Facebook Unveils Facebook Ads | Mike | Industry News | 0 | 11-07-2007 04:52 AM |