Official: Google Buys YouTube for $1.65 Billion, Grabs Lead in Web Videos - WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum - Internet Marketing Webmaster SEO Forum
Go Back   WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum - Internet Marketing Webmaster SEO Forum > Free Section > Industry News
Register WF Live Members List Mark Forums Read Advertise

Industry News We are the first to have streaming news feeds where you can get content for your blogs about reported news stories directly effecting the webmaster industry. Syndicated blogs will also be posted here.. if they are good enough!

Welcome to the WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum - Internet Marketing Webmaster SEO Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-09-2006, 10:08 PM   #1 (permalink)
Jon
 
Jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 7,303
iTrader: (0)
Jon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond repute
Checkthisout Official: Google Buys YouTube for $1.65 Billion, Grabs Lead in Web Videos

Quote:
Oct. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Google Inc., the most-used Internet search engine, agreed to buy YouTube Inc. for $1.65 billion, adding the largest video-sharing site on the Web and an audience that watches more than 100 million clips a day.


Founders Chad Hurley and Steve Chen and their 65 employees will join the company, Google said today in a statement distributed by Business Wire. In less than two years, San Bruno, California-based YouTube has catapulted from startup to Internet icon with 34 million monthly U.S. visitors.


The stock purchase, Google's largest, underscores the pressure on the Mountain View, California-based company from startups such as YouTube and friend-finder Facebook.com, which are creating new markets for film clips and social networking. The acquisition also builds on Google's strategy to add more content to attract advertisers.


``YouTube has huge traffic and is able to reach and appeal to a whole new set of potential viewers,'' Scott Kessler, an analyst at Standard & Poor's in New York, said before the announcement. ``That's the key.''


In total visitors, the purchase vaults Google to second place among U.S. Internet companies from third. The two brands combined had 101 million visitors in August, according to Nielsen//NetRatings. Yahoo! Inc. sites had 106.7 million and Microsoft Corp.'s MSN Internet division had 98.5 million.
Shares of Google rose $8.50 to $429 at 4 p.m. New York time in Nasdaq Stock Market composite trading. They have risen 3.4 percent this year.


Spending more than $1 billion on an acquisition is a departure for Google, which has typically bought smaller startups such as mapping software maker Keyhole Corp. and Upstartle, creator of a Web-based word processor. Google had $9.82 billion in cash and marketable securities as of June 30 and generated sales of $6.14 billion in 2005.


YouTube's business fits Google's strategy of using Internet content as a platform to sell ads. In December, Google agreed to buy 5 percent of Time Warner Inc.'s AOL to show ads to AOL search users. Google agreed in August to provide search and keyword advertising for News Corp.'s MySpace.com.
Read the rest of the article HERE on Bloomberg.com
__________________
There's someone in my head... but its not me.
Jon is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 10:10 PM   #2 (permalink)
Jon
 
Jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 7,303
iTrader: (0)
Jon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond repute
Imagine going from making nothing, to getting your hands on at least $530M?! Jesus Christ that's one sweet payday! Eat your heart out Tom and Myspace!
__________________
There's someone in my head... but its not me.
Jon is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 10:21 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,985
iTrader: (0)
Andrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond repute
What did Tom take away from the Myspace deal anyways? Like 20 or 30 million?
Andrew is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 10:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
stickycarrots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 396
iTrader: (6)
stickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond repute
Yeah, I'm guessing they're having a HUGE party tonight...lol
stickycarrots is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 10:24 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
stickycarrots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 396
iTrader: (6)
stickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond reputestickycarrots has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
What did Tom take away from the Myspace deal anyways? Like 20 or 30 million?
Plus a like two million a year to continue to work on it...lol
stickycarrots is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 10:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
y.is.Saadh.so.loveable
 
Saadh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NJ, USA.
Posts: 889
iTrader: (0)
Saadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these parts
wow big news. i seriously didn't think youtube would go for more than a billion.

what do people think about facebook now?
__________________
Saadh is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 10:37 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Ataraxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 234
iTrader: (0)
Ataraxy has a reputation beyond reputeAtaraxy has a reputation beyond reputeAtaraxy has a reputation beyond reputeAtaraxy has a reputation beyond reputeAtaraxy has a reputation beyond reputeAtaraxy has a reputation beyond reputeAtaraxy has a reputation beyond reputeAtaraxy has a reputation beyond reputeAtaraxy has a reputation beyond reputeAtaraxy has a reputation beyond reputeAtaraxy has a reputation beyond repute
Yeah, they're partying alright.
__________________

My ideas for making money online.


I am just an atom in an ectoplasmic sea without direction or a reason to exist. The anechoic nebula rotating in my brain is persuading me contritely to persist.
Ataraxy is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 10:38 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Michael_Goldman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: upside down
Posts: 101
iTrader: (0)
Michael_Goldman is infamous around these partsMichael_Goldman is infamous around these partsMichael_Goldman is infamous around these partsMichael_Goldman is infamous around these partsMichael_Goldman is infamous around these partsMichael_Goldman is infamous around these partsMichael_Goldman is infamous around these partsMichael_Goldman is infamous around these partsMichael_Goldman is infamous around these partsMichael_Goldman is infamous around these partsMichael_Goldman is infamous around these parts
Something tells me its not good news for us adsensers..
This may brings lots of cheap traffic to adsense and overall more pageviews for adwords ads - which is mor competition over high bids ...
Michael_Goldman is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 10:54 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 584
iTrader: (1)
pocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael_Goldman View Post
Something tells me its not good news for us adsensers..
This may brings lots of cheap traffic to adsense and overall more pageviews for adwords ads - which is mor competition over high bids ...
It's not going to make a bit of difference. Adsense has always been running on YouTube -- only now Google gets the entire cut.
pocketrockets is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 10:55 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
Stanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 2,981
iTrader: (1)
Stanley has a reputation beyond reputeStanley has a reputation beyond reputeStanley has a reputation beyond reputeStanley has a reputation beyond reputeStanley has a reputation beyond reputeStanley has a reputation beyond reputeStanley has a reputation beyond reputeStanley has a reputation beyond reputeStanley has a reputation beyond reputeStanley has a reputation beyond reputeStanley has a reputation beyond repute
You have to look at the bigger picture.

Google is picking up leverage to go against traditional media.
YouTube + Google Video = millions of videos and a huge following
Most people wouldn't mind ditching stupid midday soap operas to watch amateur (but amusing) videos online
__________________
What Is My Referer?
Stanley is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 02:36 AM   #11 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 54
iTrader: (0)
netizen-x can only hope to improve
Mark Cubans had a lot to say
netizen-x is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 02:53 AM   #12 (permalink)
Jon
 
Jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 7,303
iTrader: (0)
Jon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond repute
YouTube is an easy market, it's got the potential to be fucking massive compared to anything else out there.. There's no way you can compare it to the lame Facebook.

I've personally purchased advertising on the Facebook, and it was by far one of the worst and most overly inflated and over hyped ad campaigns I had ever run. I was running a custom site that was giving away free super bowl tickets. It was a basic lead signup, about 4-5 general fields, did amazing on Adwords and Yahoo. I figured I'd test it with the big college football schools. Ran the campaign for 2 weeks..
Total leads = zero
Total clicks = 3
Amount spent = over $1k

Comparing that to adwords, where I was bidding on very similar niches, the ROI was like 5:1.

I've heard from plenty of others, Facebook blows. All they have going for them is that they are the hub for college kids to communicate with one another without the annoying feel and ads of myspace. Other than that, their advertising absolutely blows, and the owners of it are fucking idiots if they think they can turn down two huge offers in hopes for a Google buyout of $3 Billion. Those guys are fucking dreaming. Turning down that $2B offer from Yahoo was suicide. All Google has to do is make an offer for $1 MILLION.. not BILLION, and they will automatically lose all respect and any possibility of banking like they had hoped to do so.

I really want to see the Facebook sell for $10M or less.

If I owned FaceBook, I would turn it from losing cash or breaking even, to a cash cow powerhouse. Easy shit to do.
__________________
There's someone in my head... but its not me.
Jon is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 03:16 AM   #13 (permalink)
y.is.Saadh.so.loveable
 
Saadh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NJ, USA.
Posts: 889
iTrader: (0)
Saadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these partsSaadh is infamous around these parts
i wasn't comparing to facebook. i was more or less mocking them...i've advertised through facebook before. yeah i know it totally sucks. shit load of impressions, few clicks, no good conversions. I didn't spend $1k, but still loss of money over nothing.

$10M haha, if that happens that would be hilarious.
__________________
Saadh is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 05:23 AM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
L146705's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 284
iTrader: (2)
L146705 has a reputation beyond reputeL146705 has a reputation beyond reputeL146705 has a reputation beyond reputeL146705 has a reputation beyond reputeL146705 has a reputation beyond reputeL146705 has a reputation beyond reputeL146705 has a reputation beyond reputeL146705 has a reputation beyond reputeL146705 has a reputation beyond reputeL146705 has a reputation beyond reputeL146705 has a reputation beyond repute
youtube dosen't make any profit so it was way over priced, they could have got it for a lot cheaper. In the long term I think its a good deal for google as they know how to monitise it also they have cut out msn, yahoo etc.. from the video market. Its also imporatant to note that google was sitting on a cash pile of 10 billion so were under pressure to spend.
L146705 is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 08:26 AM   #15 (permalink)
 
illusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,498
iTrader: (0)
illusion has a reputation beyond reputeillusion has a reputation beyond reputeillusion has a reputation beyond reputeillusion has a reputation beyond reputeillusion has a reputation beyond reputeillusion has a reputation beyond reputeillusion has a reputation beyond reputeillusion has a reputation beyond reputeillusion has a reputation beyond reputeillusion has a reputation beyond reputeillusion has a reputation beyond repute
Damn that is some cash. YouTube and Google Video were like the main competitors, now they are the same. Still better be the same if not better quality and amount of videos being added to YouTube everyday.
illusion is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 12:14 PM   #16 (permalink)
Jon
 
Jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 7,303
iTrader: (0)
Jon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by L146705 View Post
youtube dosen't make any profit so it was way over priced, they could have got it for a lot cheaper. In the long term I think its a good deal for google as they know how to monitise it also they have cut out msn, yahoo etc.. from the video market. Its also imporatant to note that google was sitting on a cash pile of 10 billion so were under pressure to spend.
Well, Google paid almost 3x what MSN was offering. But then again, MSN wasn't looking to buy it, just sign an advertising deal.
__________________
There's someone in my head... but its not me.
Jon is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 02:31 PM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 584
iTrader: (1)
pocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond reputepocketrockets has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by L146705 View Post
youtube dosen't make any profit so it was way over priced, they could have got it for a lot cheaper. In the long term I think its a good deal for google as they know how to monitise it also they have cut out msn, yahoo etc.. from the video market. Its also imporatant to note that google was sitting on a cash pile of 10 billion so were under pressure to spend.
I know most of the reports out there say YouTube doesn't make any money but the reality is nobody knows for sure except YouTube. I'm guessing they already do. They were only backed with $15m and haven't required any more capital. With 100m videos viewed a day that is a shitload of eyeballs and clicks. I think they are starting to get in the black with the increase in traffic and advertising deals. This article estimates YouTube is pulling in $175,000 a day just from the home page ($5m a month) plus another $75,000 a day in other display ads for a total of $7.5M per month in revenues. Another analyst has pegged YouTube to do $112m next year. I'm sure this would easily cover all the bandwidth costs at these rates.

I agree it's a good deal for google since their market cap increased over $2B just the last week -- so this is a drop in the bucket for them and gets them the #1 video site instantly. Plus, I'm sure their network has enough room to add YouTube's without any major costs involved.

Btw, MSN is working on their YouTube version called "SoapBox" -- we'll see how that does http://soapbox.msn.com/

Microsoft just seems to always be behind in the internet sector. They just don't get it or don't want to. They could have easily purchased YouTube instead they are going to try and build something from scratch that is already 2yrs behind. The consumer has already decided that YouTube is going to be THE video destination with a 50% market share. It's almost impossible at this point to make people switch a service. It's like when everyone tried to enter the auction business to compete with ebay. There were better services than ebay but they already had the audience.
pocketrockets is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 03:57 PM   #18 (permalink)
 
DruSam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,734
iTrader: (0)
DruSam has a reputation beyond reputeDruSam has a reputation beyond reputeDruSam has a reputation beyond reputeDruSam has a reputation beyond reputeDruSam has a reputation beyond reputeDruSam has a reputation beyond reputeDruSam has a reputation beyond reputeDruSam has a reputation beyond reputeDruSam has a reputation beyond reputeDruSam has a reputation beyond reputeDruSam has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketrockets View Post
Btw, MSN is working on their YouTube version called "SoapBox" -- we'll see how that does http://soapbox.msn.com/

Microsoft just seems to always be behind in the internet sector. They just don't get it or don't want to. They could have easily purchased YouTube instead they are going to try and build something from scratch that is already 2yrs behind. The consumer has already decided that YouTube is going to be THE video destination with a 50% market share. It's almost impossible at this point to make people switch a service. It's like when everyone tried to enter the auction business to compete with ebay. There were better services than ebay but they already had the audience.
Maybe. But remember Microsoft wasn't first in browsers either. And they have 80% marketshare. They weren't first to online gaming. Now they have widely successful Xbox Live service that's expanding to PCs and cellphones in a year or two. Microsoft still has a ton of cash to throw around so I think they can gain marketshare of the video industry if perhaps they gobbled up some of the smaller video sites. I bet they will end up a close second.
__________________
Create Gmail accounts quickly with The Mailbot. Enable forwarding and POP automatically. Proxy support.
DruSam is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 04:18 PM   #19 (permalink)
A-D
NSFW
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 297
iTrader: (0)
A-D has a reputation beyond reputeA-D has a reputation beyond reputeA-D has a reputation beyond reputeA-D has a reputation beyond reputeA-D has a reputation beyond reputeA-D has a reputation beyond reputeA-D has a reputation beyond reputeA-D has a reputation beyond reputeA-D has a reputation beyond reputeA-D has a reputation beyond reputeA-D has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketrockets View Post
I know most of the reports out there say YouTube doesn't make any money but the reality is nobody knows for sure except YouTube. I'm guessing they already do. They were only backed with $15m and haven't required any more capital. With 100m videos viewed a day that is a shitload of eyeballs and clicks. I think they are starting to get in the black with the increase in traffic and advertising deals. This article estimates YouTube is pulling in $175,000 a day just from the home page ($5m a month) plus another $75,000 a day in other display ads for a total of $7.5M per month in revenues. Another analyst has pegged YouTube to do $112m next year. I'm sure this would easily cover all the bandwidth costs at these rates.
That article doesnt take into count that a large percentage of youtubes 100mill videos a day are streamed on other websites not youtube itself.
__________________
!
A-D is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 05:01 PM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 584
iTrader: (1)