WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum - Internet Marketing Webmaster SEO Forum

Go Back   WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum - Internet Marketing Webmaster SEO Forum > Free Section > Industry News

Industry News We are the first to have streaming news feeds where you can get content for your blogs about reported news stories directly effecting the webmaster industry.


Welcome to the WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum - Internet Marketing Webmaster SEO Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-02-2009, 05:21 PM   #1 (permalink)
Jon
 
Jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 9,125
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Jon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond reputeJon has a reputation beyond repute
Wfexclusive CX Digital Pulls All Grant Offers

Just heard that CX is planning on pulling all of their grant offers. I've been told "its due to a risk of being sued" by a source that wishes to remain anonymous. It still doesn't really make much sense, as they are pushing Acai pretty hard, and that's way worse in the misleading or risk of being sued dept than Grants.

Waiting for comments from upper management about the decision and reasons behind it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karnul
Forget that attorney shit. Just do whatever the next few posters suggest, you can't lose.
Quote:
Originally Posted by George Carlin
The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.
Jon is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 05:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
Too Cool for School
 
TheDean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 338
iTrader: 0 / 0%
TheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon View Post
It still doesn't really make much sense, as they are pushing Acai pretty hard, and that's way worse in the misleading or risk of being sued dept than Grants.
I disagree. The reason the grants model is much more serious is that it is tied directly to a Federal Government program. Misrepresentations of a government program can skull fuck you.

Diet claims are tied to a product. Misrepresentations of a sugar pill, well now that's a different story...at worst a fat chick bites you in your ass because she's still hungry...
TheDean is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 05:45 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
xmcp123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Not Louisiana
Posts: 3,947
iTrader: 3 / 100%
xmcp123 has a reputation beyond reputexmcp123 has a reputation beyond reputexmcp123 has a reputation beyond reputexmcp123 has a reputation beyond reputexmcp123 has a reputation beyond reputexmcp123 has a reputation beyond reputexmcp123 has a reputation beyond reputexmcp123 has a reputation beyond reputexmcp123 has a reputation beyond reputexmcp123 has a reputation beyond reputexmcp123 has a reputation beyond repute
I wonder if this was a result of their in-house team, or the offers themselves
__________________
xmcp123 is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 08:59 PM   #4 (permalink)
Pointy-Haired Boss
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,007
iTrader: 0 / 0%
gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDean View Post
I disagree. The reason the grants model is much more serious is that it is tied directly to a Federal Government program. Misrepresentations of a government program can skull fuck you.

Diet claims are tied to a product. Misrepresentations of a sugar pill, well now that's a different story...at worst a fat chick bites you in your ass because she's still hungry...
Actually, that's not really true. There's plenty of grants on a state level, as well as private grants by foundations, charities, non profit organizations, companies, international organizations etc. So grants do not necessarily imply a Government association. Also, a lot of these offers aren't really misrepresenting anything. It's a fact that the US government is giving away billions in grants, its a fact that US citizens and residents are entitled to apply and there enough grants that don't have to be paid back.

The only issue with some of these sites is that they use Obama and/or Biden, include videos of him and generally represent it as a "stimulus" type of offer. And you also must have missed the part were a few of the acai advertisers "settled". The lawyer should have told them to laugh it off, stupid fat chick.

So the type of offer doesn't really matter (as long as you aren't marketing to kids & teens, that's a whole different game), if you hide your terms, have a non-existent support department, don't issue refunds, don't let your members cancel and "accidentally" double charge them, then you are going to have an issue whether you are pushing water bottle rebills or grants.
gopher is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 09:23 PM   #5 (permalink)
Too Cool for School
 
TheDean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 338
iTrader: 0 / 0%
TheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by gopher View Post
Actually, that's not really true. There's plenty of grants on a state level, as well as private grants by foundations, charities, non profit organizations, companies, international organizations etc. So grants do not necessarily imply a Government association. Also, a lot of these offers aren't really misrepresenting anything. It's a fact that the US government is giving away billions in grants, its a fact that US citizens and residents are entitled to apply and there enough grants that don't have to be paid back.

The only issue with some of these sites is that they use Obama and/or Biden, include videos of him and generally represent it as a "stimulus" type of offer. And you also must have missed the part were a few of the acai advertisers "settled". The lawyer should have told them to laugh it off, stupid fat chick.
Wow...you're splitting hairs here. I'm not talking about "grants" in some abstract way, anyone with half a brain knows they exist. I'm talking about "grants" in the Obama/Biden stimulus getmoniesfromthemotherfuckinggov type sense, this is what I mean by misrepresentation, and don't be naive to think this is a moral judgment either. I'm aware of the Acai settlements and Crush LLC 's FTC fines, news alert buddy it's already forgotten, and new acai offers are added daily. Meanwhile, CX of all networks is suspending the grant offers, I mean come on now, really connect the dots...

Quote:
So the type of offer doesn't really matter (as long as you aren't marketing to kids & teens, that's a whole different game), if you hide your terms, have a non-existent support department, don't issue refunds, don't let your members cancel and "accidentally" double charge them, then you are going to have an issue whether you are pushing water bottle rebills or grants.
The OFFER makes all the difference. Believe me, diet and grants aren't the only rebills, and there isn't nearly as much scrutiny.
TheDean is offline  
Old 03-02-2009, 11:35 PM   #6 (permalink)
Pointy-Haired Boss
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,007
iTrader: 0 / 0%
gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDean View Post
Wow...you're splitting hairs here. I'm not talking about "grants" in some abstract way, anyone with half a brain knows they exist. I'm talking about "grants" in the Obama/Biden stimulus getmoniesfromthemotherfuckinggov type sense, this is what I mean by misrepresentation, and don't be naive to think this is a moral judgment either. I'm aware of the Acai settlements and Crush LLC 's FTC fines, news alert buddy it's already forgotten, and new acai offers are added daily. Meanwhile, CX of all networks is suspending the grant offers, I mean come on now, really connect the dots...

The OFFER makes all the difference. Believe me, diet and grants aren't the only rebills, and there isn't nearly as much scrutiny.
Splitting hairs? No, not really. That's the difference between an offer running for decades without too many issues and the FTC looking into it after just a few months. And the old news somehow contradicts your earlier statement about diet offers being somehow safer than these offers.

And no, unless you make up some bogus claims, it's not going to matter and people will run into issues with the FTC/AG based on how they run the offer.
gopher is offline  
Old 03-03-2009, 03:26 AM   #7 (permalink)
Too Cool for School
 
TheDean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 338
iTrader: 0 / 0%
TheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond reputeTheDean has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by gopher View Post
Splitting hairs? No, not really. That's the difference between an offer running for decades without too many issues and the FTC looking into it after just a few months.
Christ buddy. The context of the topic is why is CX pulling its grant offers for liability concerns, while it continues to go full force with Acai. Please read that statement again, so it will sink into your skull. We're not talking about these offers in a perfect world untouched by internet marketers. How they are being run is a given. It's a fact, fucking rebills are run a certain way, so which one is more dangerous? That is the question. According to you a shady business model in the name of government grants is on par with a business model peddling diet pills. And at this moment CX disagrees with you.

Quote:
And the old news somehow contradicts your earlier statement about diet offers being somehow safer than these offers.
Then why didn't CX pull all acai offers?

Quote:
And no, unless you make up some bogus claims, it's not going to matter and people will run into issues with the FTC/AG based on how they run the offer.
I really have no idea what point you're trying to make. Who's doubting FTC/AG involvement because of the way offers are run? Welcome to the American marketplace sir, I'm glad you've discovered one of the costs of doing business and decided to share your self-evident truth. Now on matters of degree, imho CX is pulling their grant offers because the FTC grant fuck pole is a lot larger than the FTC acai fuck pole. That's my take.

Good day.
TheDean is offline  
Old 03-03-2009, 03:42 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 612
iTrader: 13 / 100%
windjc has a reputation beyond reputewindjc has a reputation beyond reputewindjc has a reputation beyond reputewindjc has a reputation beyond reputewindjc has a reputation beyond reputewindjc has a reputation beyond reputewindjc has a reputation beyond reputewindjc has a reputation beyond reputewindjc has a reputation beyond reputewindjc has a reputation beyond reputewindjc has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDean View Post
Christ buddy. The context of the topic is why is CX pulling its grant offers for liability concerns, while it continues to go full force with Acai. Please read that statement again, so it will sink into your skull. We're not talking about these offers in a perfect world untouched by internet marketers. How they are being run is a given. It's a fact, fucking rebills are run a certain way, so which one is more dangerous? That is the question. According to you a shady business model in the name of government grants is on par with a business model peddling diet pills. And at this moment CX disagrees with you.



Then why didn't CX pull all acai offers?

I really have no idea what point you're trying to make. Who's doubting FTC/AG involvement because of the way offers are run? Welcome to the American marketplace sir, I'm glad you've discovered one of the costs of doing business and decided to share your self-evident truth. Now on matters of degree, imho CX is pulling their grant offers because the FTC grant fuck pole is a lot larger than the FTC acai fuck pole. That's my take.

Good day.

I spoke to my affiliate manager at length about this today. The reason they pulled the offer is because the head of their legal division asked them to until he could come in on Tuesday and debrief them on the legalities of the landing pages of most of the offers.

Apparently CX is public (or wants to be soon) so they are being extra careful. They asked their ACAI advertisers to make their T & C more visible including sometimes have a box to check saying that they have been read.

They want the Grant Landers to do the same.

We also may (just my opinion) start seeing the end of "Obama" "Stimulus" on landers, but I get the feeling its really more about the T & C.

Grants aren't going anywhere. IMO this is all a healthy process bringing things back into line.
windjc is offline  
Old 03-03-2009, 07:27 AM   #9 (permalink)
 
AdHustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,087
iTrader: 6 / 100%
AdHustler has a reputation beyond reputeAdHustler has a reputation beyond reputeAdHustler has a reputation beyond reputeAdHustler has a reputation beyond reputeAdHustler has a reputation beyond reputeAdHustler has a reputation beyond reputeAdHustler has a reputation beyond reputeAdHustler has a reputation beyond reputeAdHustler has a reputation beyond reputeAdHustler has a reputation beyond reputeAdHustler has a reputation beyond repute
The problem with these grant offers is that they mislead people into thinking the federal government is behind the offer which of course brings a government agency in to regulate.

Not that you didnt know that LOL
__________________
AdHustler.com - Every Day I'm Hustlin'
AdHustler is offline  
Old 03-04-2009, 12:11 PM   #10 (permalink)
Pointy-Haired Boss
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,007
iTrader: 0 / 0%
gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher gopher
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDean View Post
Christ buddy. The context of the topic is why is CX pulling its grant offers for liability concerns, while it continues to go full force with Acai. Please read that statement again, so it will sink into your skull. We're not talking about these offers in a perfect world untouched by internet marketers. How they are being run is a given. It's a fact, fucking rebills are run a certain way, so which one is more dangerous? That is the question. According to you a shady business model in the name of government grants is on par with a business model peddling diet pills. And at this moment CX disagrees with you.

I really have no idea what point you're trying to make. Who's doubting FTC/AG involvement because of the way offers are run? Welcome to the American marketplace sir, I'm glad you've discovered one of the costs of doing business and decided to share your self-evident truth. Now on matters of degree, imho CX is pulling their grant offers because the FTC grant fuck pole is a lot larger than the FTC acai fuck pole. That's my take.

Good day.
You seem to be missing two things: The advertisers themselves were running sites that featured Obama or had an official sounding URL, so blaming it on the way affiliates ran the offer is only half of the story. Also, I said in my first post that grants itself aren't the problem, but implying some sort of government relation and claiming the stimulus is available for personal assistance, not grants itself. But we are running in circles.

Point I originally was trying to make is that it's not grants that is the problem, but the stimulus angle and having Obama pimp your site.
gopher is offline  
Old 03-04-2009, 02:09 PM   #11 (permalink)
Member
 
5starAffiliates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sun Diego
Posts: 73
iTrader: 0 / 0%
5starAffiliates has a reputation beyond repute5starAffiliates has a reputation beyond repute5starAffiliates has a reputation beyond repute5starAffiliates has a reputation beyond repute5starAffiliates has a reputation beyond repute5starAffiliates has a reputation beyond repute5starAffiliates has a reputation beyond repute
I knew yesterday the FTC was planning a press conference about the bogus stimulus offers. But wanted to wait to post here after the official info was up on their site. Right now they are just trying to warn consumers. Next step they will probably start slamming people with fines.

FTC Warns Consumers About Economic Stimulus Scams
__________________
Linda Buquet :: Affiliate Management Consultant
High Paying, High Integrity 5 Star Affiliate Programs
5 Star Affiliate Blogs :: 5 Star Affiliate Forums
5starAffiliates is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Facebook and Grant Offers hardcore Affiliate Marketing 9 02-06-2009 07:36 PM
grant offers mberman84 Affiliate Marketing 30 12-17-2008 09:58 AM
Scholarship And Education Offer Keyword List Jon Affiliate Marketing 5 08-10-2007 03:31 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 AM.


WickedFire.com Copyright © 2012 - WickedFire is an international registered Trademark of Coastal Synergy LLC. You may not use any of our trademarks, copyrights, content, or images without a written approval by members of Coastal Synergy LLC.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0