|
|||||||
| Industry News We are the first to have streaming news feeds where you can get content for your blogs about reported news stories directly effecting the webmaster industry. |
|
Welcome to the WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum - Internet Marketing Webmaster SEO Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
#1 Soccer Hater
|
Yeah, remember all that hoopla about google letting people bid on trademarked words? Woops!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Amat Victoria Curam
|
Trademarks are ridiculous anyway. The notion of a rosetta stone certainly predates the internet.
Rosetta Stone - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
Change Your Life Twitter ^ YouTube Thank you for your attentiveness, the forward thrusters, engage on you busters, I cut the mustard. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
King Shit
|
rosetta stone about to get super google slap. almost a google falcon punch.
__________________
United States Air Force ************************************* I recommend Hostgator Hosting. 25% off coupon code: lemons884wickedfirecoupo ************************************* |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Banned
|
I don't understand how google can be held liable for "trademark infringement". They run a proprietary software that people use to search for stuff. If an individual wants to pay google for a term that is trademarked to market something of their own or even the product. Why would google not be allowed to do it. I know this might not make sense.
How about this. Since google is owned by google and information you take from google to form a case is the property of google. The information you gather would be insubissable in court. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Maybe I'll give it another shot.. How do you learn to conjugate verbs or speak in different tenses? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
freelance writer & editor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Google Buys DoubleClick for $3.1 Billion | Stanley | Industry News | 12 | 04-22-2007 08:38 PM |
| Google advertisers cutting spending as keyword costs rise | pocketrockets | Industry News | 11 | 01-04-2007 04:47 PM |
| Adsense Down? | Stanley | Shooting The Shit | 5 | 10-11-2006 05:21 PM |
| Google's Unfair Competition | Bookworm-seo | Traffic & Content | 0 | 07-20-2006 02:38 PM |
| Yahoo settles click fraud lawsuit | JDA | Industry News | 0 | 07-01-2006 07:07 PM |