Super Duper WEB 2.0 Pyramid 200+ get back your positions
- Thread starter mrjuve
- Start date
- Status
i received a discounted review copy in the last thread, but didn't get a chance to leave my review because i asked for a drip and the thread closed. so here goes. keep in mind that i don't say good things about a service just because i get a freebie or a discount.
communication 5/5: responded to a pm promptly. didn't need any comms beyond that and that's good - we outsource because we're time poor, having to spend time on comms makes outsourcing a less attractive proposition in exponential direct proportion to the time involved.
speed 5/5: i ordered a drip, so that took some time obviously. given the drip period, the tat was perfectly reasonable for this amount of links.
quality 4.5/5: mrjuve lands his tier1 links on jcow and elgg, which i like for a number of reasons - they're not frequently spammed platforms and jcow is paid software, so the sites running it have at least a bit of investment behind them. tier1 was massively overdelivered, which is good because a non-negligible amount of posts ended up removed or behind logins. all in all, a check with sb counted 193 properties with links found. with a random sample manual review, a few turned out to have malformed anchors. those two issues are the only reason it's not a straight 5/5. with that said, 102 properties are already indexed and that is a very impressive indexing rate. what people don't realize is that it doesn't matter how many properties were delivered - how many were crawled is what counts at a minimum and having them indexed is better still. an indexing rate like this is also a very good indication of the juice behind tier1. haven't checked the other tiers in detail because i don't need to - the indexing rate of tier1 is a sufficient indicator.
results N/A: i was throwing a lot of stuff at the site and wasn't tracking the individual impact of specific packages. with that said, i know when the package started and i definitely saw it hit. i'm certain the results would have been impressive had i been tracking it and had i made less emphasis on diversity and generic/brand anchors.
value 5/5: this would be very good value even at full price. if you think otherwise, you either don't know how to value a service or have too much time on your hands.
overall 4.75/5: it's a fact that although i've reviewed a lot of services positively because they meet or exceed industry standards at a decent pricepoint, i don't always (or even often) order them again after reviewing for a variety of reasons. it is the highest of recommendations then that i can confidently say (provided the tier1 props stick after a bit) that i intend to order this service again even for sites that are on a considerably smaller budget than the one i tested it on.
-p
communication 5/5: responded to a pm promptly. didn't need any comms beyond that and that's good - we outsource because we're time poor, having to spend time on comms makes outsourcing a less attractive proposition in exponential direct proportion to the time involved.
speed 5/5: i ordered a drip, so that took some time obviously. given the drip period, the tat was perfectly reasonable for this amount of links.
quality 4.5/5: mrjuve lands his tier1 links on jcow and elgg, which i like for a number of reasons - they're not frequently spammed platforms and jcow is paid software, so the sites running it have at least a bit of investment behind them. tier1 was massively overdelivered, which is good because a non-negligible amount of posts ended up removed or behind logins. all in all, a check with sb counted 193 properties with links found. with a random sample manual review, a few turned out to have malformed anchors. those two issues are the only reason it's not a straight 5/5. with that said, 102 properties are already indexed and that is a very impressive indexing rate. what people don't realize is that it doesn't matter how many properties were delivered - how many were crawled is what counts at a minimum and having them indexed is better still. an indexing rate like this is also a very good indication of the juice behind tier1. haven't checked the other tiers in detail because i don't need to - the indexing rate of tier1 is a sufficient indicator.
results N/A: i was throwing a lot of stuff at the site and wasn't tracking the individual impact of specific packages. with that said, i know when the package started and i definitely saw it hit. i'm certain the results would have been impressive had i been tracking it and had i made less emphasis on diversity and generic/brand anchors.
value 5/5: this would be very good value even at full price. if you think otherwise, you either don't know how to value a service or have too much time on your hands.
overall 4.75/5: it's a fact that although i've reviewed a lot of services positively because they meet or exceed industry standards at a decent pricepoint, i don't always (or even often) order them again after reviewing for a variety of reasons. it is the highest of recommendations then that i can confidently say (provided the tier1 props stick after a bit) that i intend to order this service again even for sites that are on a considerably smaller budget than the one i tested it on.
-p
Yep, waiting for your order.
Feel free to order
What do you mean by "just for 1 article" ?
Yes i offer discounts for bulk orders. pm me.
Hi from your experience could you suggest good practice for a sites that were hit by penguin, I mean how many URLs to use with your pack? how much % to use KW vs general anchors? - I started to recover and I don't want to hit again...
So that is the best strategy for sites that got hit by the penguin using your service?
I will be glad to test it.
So that is the best strategy for sites that got hit by the penguin using your service?
I will be glad to test it.
Hi,
My suggestion is to to use 50% main keywords - 50% non relevant keywords.
Anyway the method was tested and everyone got positive results with two backlinks per submission (as it is described) 1st backlink with money site keywords and 2nd backlink with non relevant keywords. Or as 2nd backlinks we can use authority sites link with non relevant keywords but you will have to provide that links.
PMd you!
- Status