WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum - Internet Marketing Webmaster SEO Forum

Go Back   WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum - Internet Marketing Webmaster SEO Forum > Free Section > Newbie Questions

Newbie Questions New to the whole making money online and developing your own sites thing? Post your questions here so that seasoned members can answer your questions. Please keep your questions out of the other categories. We know you're a newbie, but there's no reason to be annoying.


Welcome to the WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum - Internet Marketing Webmaster SEO Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

View Poll Results: Which option?
Option A 190 23.51%
Option B 344 42.57%
Option C 107 13.24%
Just tell me, I'm too stupid to figure it out. 167 20.67%
Voters: 808. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-22-2009, 01:05 PM   #101 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 17
iTrader: 0 / 0%
bigsherm has a spectacular aura about
Assignment 3
You are in discussions with an advertiser for a special deal on affiliating their product. The advertiser pays you NET30 (30 days after the commission was registered). This means if you sent leads worth of $ 1000 in commissions one day, you are credited that amount 30 days later. Currently you send leads worth $ 40 000 in commissions every month.

You offer this deal to the advertiser:
"You can decrease my commissions by 1 % if you pay me NET10 from now on."
Under what condition does he accept your offer?



My Answer:

I would assume the advertiser wants the potential to make more money than they're giving up. The 1% is really insignificant here, it's the 20 day difference in payments that affects the outcome. With 40k a month, that comes out to 1,333.33 a day (30 day month). With that daily income, we multiply it by 20 days = 26,667 and take out the 1% commission decrease to get $26,400 dollars you make in 20 days at the current, non-reinvested rate. Beat this and the advertiser should consider.

Taking that 20 day total, you need to show the advertiser that you can reinvest your payments every 10 days to offset the risk they take by fronting the cash to you while they wait for their payment on the backend from customers, transaction cycle times, and processing which could be instant or have a "14 day trial" where they get the value back later than the NET10 you want.

With that, we need a little bit more information about how each side is making the money, how the advertiser is getting paid and on what terms, and what kind of metrics you're getting on your investment as the affiliate, namely the ROI and how the speedy payments can grow past that 26,400 mark in 20 days.

Assuming you get an ROI of say 35%, you're in full swing getting commissions every 10 days on the new terms and you reinvest 100% instead of renting a Lambo for the weekend...

10 x 1,333.33 = 13,333,33 *1.35 = $18,000 (Note: you have two 10 day periods in the difference of payments to grow your return in hopes of surpassing the 30 day value that is already there, this does not count towards it as this is your starting value without the new NET10. In other words, you make this currently and begin to take advantage of NET10 the following week.)

18,000 x 1.35 = $24,300 (day 10 of 30days with NET10...the idea behind this is that you have added some value to the daily investments that, when compared with the previous 30 day total, will be of more value to the advertiser. That and it provides a certain % cushion against the risk the advertiser faces of non-payment and thus in fronting you the money; based on the assumptions here).

24,300 * 1.35 = $32,805 at day 30 vs the $26,400. With these calculations and assumptions, the benefit to the advertiser would be that when you reinvest your earnings, you create an additional 6,405 in revenues on top of the $26,400 or 24.5% return. If the advertiser has a greater risk than 24.5% of providing a faster payment (ie chargebacks and cancellations or just non-payments), it may not be a good idea based on the numbers. however, if their risk is that bad already they probably have a poor product.

I hope that made sense.
bigsherm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2009, 01:25 PM   #102 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 17
iTrader: 0 / 0%
bigsherm has a spectacular aura about
Assignment 4
You have a website that is budgeted to generate $ 27 000 in revenues pr year the next 4 years.
Webhost costs are $ 1 000 pr year. Advertising costs are $ 2 000 pr year.
You outsource the article writing for the website. You will put on 40 articles pr month, 25 of which are 600 words (per article). The rest are 1000 words per article.
You will pay the article writer $4/100 words.

It is expected that you can sell it for $ 25 000 in 4 years.
Someone is offering you $ 50 000 for the website now.
The rate of return is 10 %.
What do you do - sell it now or keep it running and then sell it after 4 years?


Answer:
Fun little problem, good thing I have my financial calculator from college handy...I may be rusty so this could be off, but here it goes.

The key to this problem is to get the NPV of your website when taking into consideration the cash flows of each year and the cash flow in year 4 + sale price. If it's more than 50,000 you hold it and sell. If it isn't, take the money and run. Assumptions here are that there are no other investments that the 50,000 now can be put into and that we just use the data here.

This can definitely be done in Excel, but I had my calculator handy so bear with me.

$27,000 RevenueYr
- (3,000) Upkeep
- (14,400) Content -(25x600)+(15x1000)= 30,000 Words/100 x $4 =$1200/month
______________
$9,600 profit a year.

note: Multiplying $9,600 by 4 and adding the $25,000 doesn't give you the real value. The rate of return is going to be used to calculate the time value of money and take into account inflation, buying power, and the actual return.

I: 10%
CF1: 9600
CF2: 9600
CF3: 9600
CF4: 9600 + 25000
NPV: $57,106.04

So with my calculations, hoping they're right, you're better off holding it. Personally, I'd take the $50,000 and find a better investment like PPC, however the numbers as they are setup say holding is more profitable. If this is right, I guess I can almost justify spending over 100k for college
bigsherm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2009, 01:33 PM   #103 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 17
iTrader: 0 / 0%
bigsherm has a spectacular aura about
Assignment 5
You are an email marketer. You have observed the following:
Total emails sent pr week for 10 weeks: 49872, 52034, 47322, 56999, 48932, 43456, 53104, 50888, 45032, 49999
Total costs pr week for 10 weeks (the same weeks as above): 1500, 1743, 1388, 1844, 1599, 1333, 1900, 1011, 1803, 1800
You want to estimate a function for your total costs for a week as a function of sent emails that week. What is it?


Answer:

This can be done simply by finding the average of each week's cost per email and then average the 10 weeks for an overall average.

I used Excel to get an average cost/email of $0.0320.

# of Emails * $.0320 = Cost/Week
bigsherm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2009, 02:43 PM   #104 (permalink)
Mоderatоr
 
knukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 705
iTrader: 1 / 100%
knukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond repute
bigsherm:

Assignment 3: God, you make it complicated rofl
  • The 1 % _is_ very important
  • The $ 40 000 are irrelevant
  • The advertiser has to find the effective interest rate. Find it!
  • The advertiser compares this rate to ... and chooses to ... if ...


Assignment 4: VERY good! Everything is correct except for the NPV (and thus the end-answer). Maybe you pressed something wrong on your financial calculator.

In pure mathematics: NPV = 9600/1.10 + 9600/1.10^2 + 9600/1.10^3 + (9600 + 25000)/1.10^4 ~= 47 506

NPV < 50 000 --> thus, sell now!

Despite of that, very good and explaining answer.

Assignment 5:
Good

Alternatively, you can use regression and you will find:
C = 262,79 + 0,02671 * x
Where C = total costs, x = no. of sent emails.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbnj0904
keep your fucking ass shut!!
knukk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2009, 05:05 PM   #105 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 17
iTrader: 0 / 0%
bigsherm has a spectacular aura about
Yeah, haven't used this calculator for a while now, looks like the interest was compounded 12 times a year as opposed to the 1 in the calculator. Oops.

As for #3, I'm going to have to look at that one, the answer didn't come right to mind like the others. Obviously.

Regression, I remember that from my stats classes...teacher was batshit crazy, maybe that's why I don't like it.

Thanks for the input.
bigsherm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2009, 02:19 AM   #106 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
keeper33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 291
iTrader: 18 / 100%
keeper33 has a reputation beyond reputekeeper33 has a reputation beyond reputekeeper33 has a reputation beyond reputekeeper33 has a reputation beyond reputekeeper33 has a reputation beyond reputekeeper33 has a reputation beyond reputekeeper33 has a reputation beyond reputekeeper33 has a reputation beyond reputekeeper33 has a reputation beyond reputekeeper33 has a reputation beyond reputekeeper33 has a reputation beyond repute
That regression is funky, to say the least.

The regression coefficient (r) is .3699606367, so we have a weak correlation.

The coefficient of determination (r^2) is .1368708727, so 13.687% of the variation in y is accounted for by the regression of x on y, y being costs per week, and x being emails sent per week.

Needless to say, stats is only 10% running the numbers, the other 90% lies just below the surface.
keeper33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2009, 04:34 AM   #107 (permalink)
Mоderatоr
 
knukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 705
iTrader: 1 / 100%
knukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond repute
I didn't check the r^2, but if those numbers are true, everything you say is correct.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbnj0904
keep your fucking ass shut!!
knukk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 05:47 PM   #108 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 32
iTrader: 1 / 100%
iloveshi has a spectacular aura about
Great stuff. Will make use of the spreadsheet and calculator when analyzing offers. That's one less mistake (out of one thousand) that I'll make on my noob journey.

+rep
iloveshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 01:07 PM   #109 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4
iTrader: 0 / 0%
James P has a spectacular aura about
Hi,

Well, I just did what Henry Ford used to do. Rather than waste time working it ok, I just got someone more intelligent than me to tell me the answer....
James P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 10:57 PM   #110 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 17
iTrader: 0 / 0%
bigsherm has a spectacular aura about
Knukk,


Can you give the breakdown of question 3? I'm curious as to what you're searching for here as I have no ideas other than calculating interest over extra 20 days in holding vs. increase in revenue with faster payment turnaround....if that is the case, I'll give it hell again.
bigsherm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009, 07:17 AM   #111 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
WFBenC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12
iTrader: 0 / 0%
WFBenC has a spectacular aura about
Option C has a claimed CTR of 0.1%
WFBenC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009, 07:19 AM   #112 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
WFBenC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12
iTrader: 0 / 0%
WFBenC has a spectacular aura about
Yeah, haven't used this calculator for a while now, looks like the interest was compounded 12 times a year as opposed to the 1 in the calculator. Oops.

As for #3, I'm going to have to look at that one, the answer didn't come right to mind like the others. Obviously.

Regression, I remember that from my stats classes...teacher was batshit crazy, maybe that's why I don't like it.

Thanks for the input.
WFBenC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009, 11:08 AM   #113 (permalink)
Mucho Macho Muchacho
 
Jokerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 363
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Jokerr has a reputation beyond reputeJokerr has a reputation beyond reputeJokerr has a reputation beyond reputeJokerr has a reputation beyond reputeJokerr has a reputation beyond reputeJokerr has a reputation beyond reputeJokerr has a reputation beyond reputeJokerr has a reputation beyond reputeJokerr has a reputation beyond reputeJokerr has a reputation beyond reputeJokerr has a reputation beyond repute
Just thought I'd share a very simple script. You set your estimated cpc, budget, payout and then the script calculates how many conversions you need to break even. You need to have PHP installed on your server, if you do, just upload it and the rest is pretty self explanatory.

PHP Code:
<?php

if ($_POST['cpc'] && $_POST['budget'] && $_POST['payout']) {

       
$cpc $_POST['cpc'];
       
$budget $_POST['budget'];
       
$payout $_POST['payout'];

       
$clicks $budget/$cpc;
       
$conversionsTBE $budget/$payout;
       
$conversionRateTBE $conversionsTBE/$clicks;
       
$conversionRateTBE $conversionRateTBE*100;

       
$data "You can afford apr. ".floor($clicks)." clicks. You need apr. ".floor($conversionsTBE)." converions to break even, a conversion rate of <b>".substr($conversionRateTBE0,3)."%</b><br />";

}

?>

<form method="post">
Esitmated CPC <input type="text" name="cpc" />
Your Budget <input type="text" name="budget" />
Offer Payout <input type="text" name="payout" />
<input type="submit" name="submit" value="Calculate!" />
</form>

<?php if ($data) { echo '<div style="border: 1px solid #000; background: green; padding: 5px; color: #fff;">'.$data.'</div>'; } 
?>
Jokerr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009, 12:18 PM   #114 (permalink)
Mоderatоr
 
knukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 705
iTrader: 1 / 100%
knukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigsherm View Post
Knukk,


Can you give the breakdown of question 3? I'm curious as to what you're searching for here as I have no ideas other than calculating interest over extra 20 days in holding vs. increase in revenue with faster payment turnaround....if that is the case, I'll give it hell again.
Here is my solution to it:
The idea is that by you offering the advertiser a 1 % decrease on their payouts to you by paying you in 10 days instead of 30 days, they can measure an effective interest rate.

The formula for the effective interest rate is: (1 + per cent factor)^(days pr year / (previous payment time - new payment time)) - 1

Effective interest rate: (1+0,01)^(365 / (30 - 10)) - 1 = 0,1991 = 19,91 %. If the advertiser can finance himself at a cheaper rate, he will accept it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbnj0904
keep your fucking ass shut!!
knukk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2009, 02:15 AM   #115 (permalink)
Napoleon had my complex
 
Mkting Samurai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 59
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Mkting Samurai has a spectacular aura about
Thanks for the both the spread sheet and the script ...

The breakdown on question 3 makes more sense now ... I think
Thanks again
Mkting Samurai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2009, 04:05 PM   #116 (permalink)
Extreme Newbie
 
brucep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 4
iTrader: 0 / 0%
brucep has a spectacular aura about
Oh, before I go, here's the spreadsheet I have open 24/7 for quick calculations. If you're not using something like this, take mine, or build your own. If you don't understand it at first, just look at the calculations I'm using. The colored cells are the only ones you need to change.

Attachment 675[/QUOTE]

Thanks for the spreadsheet it will be a great help!!! Also good to find a link where I do not get DICK ROLLED.
brucep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 10:25 AM   #117 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
okuku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: the other world
Posts: 9
iTrader: 0 / 0%
okuku has a spectacular aura about
The spreadsheet looks cool. Though I don't know what the hell I'm gonna use it for yet.

I believe I will soon know wit you guy's help.
okuku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 03:27 AM   #118 (permalink)
Pheasant Heavy Breathing
 
PhillipMarlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,771
iTrader: 7 / 100%
PhillipMarlow has a reputation beyond reputePhillipMarlow has a reputation beyond reputePhillipMarlow has a reputation beyond reputePhillipMarlow has a reputation beyond reputePhillipMarlow has a reputation beyond reputePhillipMarlow has a reputation beyond reputePhillipMarlow has a reputation beyond reputePhillipMarlow has a reputation beyond reputePhillipMarlow has a reputation beyond reputePhillipMarlow has a reputation beyond reputePhillipMarlow has a reputation beyond repute
Fuck yeah! Was about to whip one of these together...this saved me hours. Thanks +rep
PhillipMarlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 09:58 PM   #119 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 118
iTrader: 1 / 100%
imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre
Again another thing that makes me feel like a total dumbass..

Thanks for sharing the info and the questions guys. No PPC course or gurus teach this kind of practical/complicated/much needed stuff.

Mike, thanks for the spread sheet.

Can we get some more scenarios?? The cost valuation question for the website was really cool. With a small biz background, i would have jumped on the $50k offer.

Thanks again
imouttehre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 11:42 AM   #120 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9
iTrader: 0 / 0%
orange has a spectacular aura about
wooh good thread! tnxx so much, had a good time while reading -)
orange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 09:25 PM   #121 (permalink)
Check Six
 
stevo7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 21
iTrader: 0 / 0%
stevo7 has a spectacular aura about
Much thx for the spreadsheet, Mike! Mucho useful.
stevo7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 09:30 PM   #122 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 18
iTrader: 0 / 0%
theemerchant has a spectacular aura about
Cant Wait

I can't wait for the answer. I'll go for B if it was my decision.
theemerchant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 01:31 PM   #123 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 118
iTrader: 1 / 100%
imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre
Quote:
Originally Posted by theemerchant View Post
I can't wait for the answer. I'll go for B if it was my decision.

the answers are already posted. Read through the thread.
imouttehre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 10:41 AM   #124 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7
iTrader: 0 / 0%
balright has a spectacular aura about
Damn shame my math major doesn't help me write content. Who wants to market on a math site? Anyone? Oh.
balright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 03:36 PM   #125 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 42
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Carpaccio has a reputation beyond reputeCarpaccio has a reputation beyond reputeCarpaccio has a reputation beyond reputeCarpaccio has a reputation beyond reputeCarpaccio has a reputation beyond reputeCarpaccio has a reputation beyond reputeCarpaccio has a reputation beyond reputeCarpaccio has a reputation beyond reputeCarpaccio has a reputation beyond reputeCarpaccio has a reputation beyond reputeCarpaccio has a reputation beyond repute
Newb and math retard over here. Thank you, this is absolutely awesome.
Carpaccio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 04:30 PM   #126 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 19
iTrader: 0 / 0%
whatyaknow has a spectacular aura about
Awesome thread Mike and really appreciate the xls.

Anyone else have worksheets they use for calculations?
whatyaknow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 02:51 PM   #127 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
dhamma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 148
iTrader: 0 / 0%
dhamma has a reputation beyond reputedhamma has a reputation beyond reputedhamma has a reputation beyond reputedhamma has a reputation beyond reputedhamma has a reputation beyond reputedhamma has a reputation beyond reputedhamma has a reputation beyond reputedhamma has a reputation beyond reputedhamma has a reputation beyond reputedhamma has a reputation beyond reputedhamma has a reputation beyond repute
Excellent examples - and xls.

Thanks
dhamma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 08:13 AM   #128 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 27
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Harsh has a spectacular aura about
i justed click on A but i saw the meaning of A after voting
Harsh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 06:46 PM   #129 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
bloodsucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1
iTrader: 0 / 0%
bloodsucker has a spectacular aura about
thank s God, i love math. I m more in peace..
bloodsucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 02:37 AM   #130 (permalink)
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: marvelously gleeful
Posts: 6,024
iTrader: 30 / 100%
Mike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond repute
Since I posted that original XLS spreadsheet, I've made a slight change to the CPM column by adding "Country".

"Country" on my spreadsheet is the percentage of traffic that comes from countries that I can theoretically convert. So, if I've got an offer that is US only, then I need to know what percent of their traffic is US. Obviously, if you are targeting US only then the percent is 100% (duh), but a lot of sites you'll find can't geotarget traffic for you, so then you'll need to enter the percent of traffic you can actually convert.

Also, I added "Off Page CTR" and changed the conversion rate so that it's based on the clicks off page, and not total clicks.

Just play around with it, you'll figure it out.

cpc-calculator.zip
__________________

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE
Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2009, 10:55 AM   #131 (permalink)
Mоderatоr
 
knukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 705
iTrader: 1 / 100%
knukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond repute
Once exams are over I will see to that I post a new batch of assignments here.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbnj0904
keep your fucking ass shut!!
knukk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2009, 05:42 PM   #132 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
metoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 228
iTrader: 2 / 100%
metoo has a reputation beyond reputemetoo has a reputation beyond reputemetoo has a reputation beyond reputemetoo has a reputation beyond reputemetoo has a reputation beyond reputemetoo has a reputation beyond reputemetoo has a reputation beyond reputemetoo has a reputation beyond reputemetoo has a reputation beyond reputemetoo has a reputation beyond reputemetoo has a reputation beyond repute
I'll answer from just reading the 1st post, cos I know the rest of the thread will be filled with the answers...

You make 80 cents per click, so:

A: $1000
B: $2000
C: Take it if the CTR for the banner is > then 0.25

I'll leave this here with no edits. If I screwed it up, I figure who gives a shit. At least I had a go. My poor calculator, hehe
metoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2009, 09:03 PM   #133 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 73
iTrader: 0 / 0%
invinceable invinceable invinceable invinceable invinceable invinceable invinceable invinceable invinceable invinceable invinceable
Thank you very much for the spread sheet, looks very nice!
invinceable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2009, 05:40 AM   #134 (permalink)
Mоderatоr
 
knukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 705
iTrader: 1 / 100%
knukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond repute
Okai folks! It has been a long time now since there has been some work here; time for a new batch of assignments. I will add more soon, hopefully If you haven't done the previous assignments I posted, you should go back and practice on them. Solution proposals have been posted in this thread.

As for the new assignments, assignment 6 is very easy while assignment 7 requires some more work.

Assignment 6
You buy a computer for $1500 and do not use it for a year. Assume that you can and do sell it for $1500 after that year.

Question 1: What did the computer cost you?

Now, forget the computer.
Question 2: Generally, in your decision making, should you care about absolute or relative prices?

Assignment 7
You are interested in a new niche you are wondering about Internet marketing a product in. Assume that the product's a priori probability for high demand (H) is 0.4. There is only high (H) and low (L) demand. You want to test the niche by PPC. The testing will give you an indication 'g' if the signal is good, and 'b' if the signal is bad. From your previous experience in testing new products in similar niches, the probability of a good indication is 60% given high demand, while the probability of a bad signal given low demand is 90%. Assume these measures are representable here too. If you decide to market the product you will have a 35 000 profits if there is high demand, and 5 000 profits if there is low demand. If you do not proceed in marketing the product your profits are 15 000 from other marketing activites, independent of the demand state for the product in question. Assume that you are risk neutral, i.e. you only care about expected profits. How much should you spend on testing the product in the niche?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbnj0904
keep your fucking ass shut!!
knukk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2009, 02:31 AM   #135 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 102
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Expert has a spectacular aura about
I really use these when dealing with my business models based on recurring income. You have to incorporate attrtion rate into the equation though.
Expert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2009, 11:33 AM   #136 (permalink)
Mоderatоr
 
knukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 705
iTrader: 1 / 100%
knukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond repute
Meh, does anyone want to give the new assignments a try?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbnj0904
keep your fucking ass shut!!
knukk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 05:01 PM   #137 (permalink)
I am Lost
 
IcanWrite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 67
iTrader: 8 / 100%
IcanWrite has a reputation beyond reputeIcanWrite has a reputation beyond reputeIcanWrite has a reputation beyond reputeIcanWrite has a reputation beyond reputeIcanWrite has a reputation beyond reputeIcanWrite has a reputation beyond reputeIcanWrite has a reputation beyond reputeIcanWrite has a reputation beyond reputeIcanWrite has a reputation beyond reputeIcanWrite has a reputation beyond reputeIcanWrite has a reputation beyond repute
Nice job on these. The spreadsheets seem really useful. I love math though haha
hell yeah! i got it right!!
IcanWrite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2009, 07:07 PM   #138 (permalink)
Monkey Business
 
*niko*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 43
iTrader: 0 / 0%
*niko* *niko* *niko* *niko* *niko* *niko* *niko* *niko* *niko* *niko* *niko*
Quote:
Originally Posted by knukk View Post
Assignment 6
You buy a computer for $1500 and do not use it for a year. Assume that you can and do sell it for $1500 after that year.

Question 1: What did the computer cost you?
Inflation Rate, so if inflation is 3% I would lose $45

Quote:
Question 2: Generally, in your decision making, should you care about absolute or relative prices?
Totally depends on the lifespan of your project and the item. Also if you are thinking about selling said item after you use it or not. In general electronics have issues with resale value...

I tend to go with absolute price. And if it matters I weigh it by projected ROI % - 30 (because I always tend to overestimate)

Quote:
Assignment 7
You are interested in a new niche you are wondering about Internet marketing a product in. Assume that the product's a priori probability for high demand (H) is 0.4. There is only high (H) and low (L) demand. You want to test the niche by PPC. The testing will give you an indication 'g' if the signal is good, and 'b' if the signal is bad. From your previous experience in testing new products in similar niches, the probability of a good indication is 60% given high demand, while the probability of a bad signal given low demand is 90%. Assume these measures are representable here too. If you decide to market the product you will have a 35 000 profits if there is high demand, and 5 000 profits if there is low demand. If you do not proceed in marketing the product your profits are 15 000 from other marketing activites, independent of the demand state for the product in question. Assume that you are risk neutral, i.e. you only care about expected profits. How much should you spend on testing the product in the niche?
Working on this one...
__________________
http://ppcplusplus.com Affiliate Marketing for Newbies
http://twitter.com/PPCPlusPlus
*niko* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 05:49 PM   #139 (permalink)
Mоderatоr
 
knukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 705
iTrader: 1 / 100%
knukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by *niko* View Post
Inflation Rate, so if inflation is 3% I would lose $45
Good. I understand it so that you by inflation refer to a general price increase. I don't define inflation as such, but that's what you meant, so it's good. But such a general price increase is only part of the actual costs during that year. The general idea is to consider relevant alternative costs, one of which you mentioned.



Quote:
Totally depends on the lifespan of your project and the item. Also if you are thinking about selling said item after you use it or not. In general electronics have issues with resale value...

I tend to go with absolute price. And if it matters I weigh it by projected ROI % - 30 (because I always tend to overestimate)
Price - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Basically what matters are the relative prices. It is not interesting in itself if a computer costs $1000 or $2000, but what the price ratios to prices of other commodities are. A cell phone for $10 000 may sound pretty expensive, but that is assuming that you are facing prices of other goods similar to those today. If the prices of all other goods were given a large shift upwards, then those $10 000 would start to look like a better offer.

Quote:
Working on this one...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbnj0904
keep your fucking ass shut!!
knukk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 07:21 PM   #140 (permalink)
 
papajohn56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SC
Posts: 6,673
iTrader: 16 / 100%
papajohn56 has a reputation beyond reputepapajohn56 has a reputation beyond reputepapajohn56 has a reputation beyond reputepapajohn56 has a reputation beyond reputepapajohn56 has a reputation beyond reputepapajohn56 has a reputation beyond reputepapajohn56 has a reputation beyond reputepapajohn56 has a reputation beyond reputepapajohn56 has a reputation beyond reputepapajohn56 has a reputation beyond reputepapajohn56 has a reputation beyond repute
There's a lot more advanced math that you can apply to affiliate marketing, too. If you're good with statistical analysis and calculus, there's methods for it. I'll see what I can come up with to post here for more info.

I love math
__________________
papajohn56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2010, 05:52 AM   #141 (permalink)
Mоderatоr
 
knukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 705
iTrader: 1 / 100%
knukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond repute
Solution proposal assignment 7:
A quick intro to probability notation:
Pr(x|i) means the probability of x given i.
Pr(x & i) means the probability of x and i occuring together.
Pr(x) means the unconditional probability of x occuring.

Now let's solve the problem at hand:

Apriori:
Pr(g|H) = 0.6
Pr(b|H) = 0.4
Pr(g|L) = 0.1
Pr(b|L) = 0.9

Needed for later:
Pr(H & g) = Pr(H) * Pr(g|H) = 0.4 * 0.6 = 0.24
Pr(H & b) = Pr(H) * Pr(b|H) = 0.4 * 0.4 = 0.16
Pr(L & g) = Pr(L) * Pr(g|L) = 0.6 * 0.1 = 0.06
Pr(L & b) = Pr(L) * Pr(b|L) = 0.6 * 0.9 = 0.54
Pr(g) = Pr(H & g) + Pr(L & g) = 0.30
Pr(b) = Pr(H & b) + Pr(L & b) = 0.70

Aposteriori probabilities:
Pr(H|g) = Pr(H & g)/Pr(g) = 0.24/0.30 = 0.8
Pr(H|b) = Pr(H & b)/Pr(b) = 0.16/0.70 ~= 0.229
Pr(L|g) = Pr(L & g)/Pr(g) = 0.06/0.30 = 0.2
Pr(L|b) = Pr(L & b)/Pr(b) = 0.54/0.70 ~= 0.771

Optimal choices based on expected profits:
Apriori:
Marketing the product yields expected profits: 0.4 * 35 000 + 0.6 * 5 000 = 17 000
Not marketing yields: 15 000
Thus you choose to market apriori.

Aposteriori:
Expected profits if indication is g:
If marketing: Pr(H|g) * 35 000 + Pr(L|g) * 10 000 = 29 000
If not marketing: 15 000
You choose marketing.

Expected profits if indication is b:
If marketing: Pr(H|b) * 35 000 + Pr(L|b) * 15 000 = 11 870
If not marketing: 15 000
You choose not marketing.

Value of testing = Pr(g) * 29 000 + Pr(b) * 15 000 - 17 000 = 2 200
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbnj0904
keep your fucking ass shut!!
knukk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 06:04 PM   #142 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 118
iTrader: 1 / 100%
imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre imouttehre
a request for more cpm problems?
imouttehre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 06:13 PM   #143 (permalink)
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: marvelously gleeful
Posts: 6,024
iTrader: 30 / 100%
Mike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by knukk View Post
Solution proposal assignment 7:
A quick intro to probability notation:
Pr(x|i) means the probability of x given i.
Pr(x & i) means the probability of x and i occuring together.
Pr(x) means the unconditional probability of x occuring.

Now let's solve the problem at hand:

Apriori:
Pr(g|H) = 0.6
Pr(b|H) = 0.4
Pr(g|L) = 0.1
Pr(b|L) = 0.9

Needed for later:
Pr(H & g) = Pr(H) * Pr(g|H) = 0.4 * 0.6 = 0.24
Pr(H & b) = Pr(H) * Pr(b|H) = 0.4 * 0.4 = 0.16
Pr(L & g) = Pr(L) * Pr(g|L) = 0.6 * 0.1 = 0.06
Pr(L & b) = Pr(L) * Pr(b|L) = 0.6 * 0.9 = 0.54
Pr(g) = Pr(H & g) + Pr(L & g) = 0.30
Pr(b) = Pr(H & b) + Pr(L & b) = 0.70

Aposteriori probabilities:
Pr(H|g) = Pr(H & g)/Pr(g) = 0.24/0.30 = 0.8
Pr(H|b) = Pr(H & b)/Pr(b) = 0.16/0.70 ~= 0.229
Pr(L|g) = Pr(L & g)/Pr(g) = 0.06/0.30 = 0.2
Pr(L|b) = Pr(L & b)/Pr(b) = 0.54/0.70 ~= 0.771

Optimal choices based on expected profits:
Apriori:
Marketing the product yields expected profits: 0.4 * 35 000 + 0.6 * 5 000 = 17 000
Not marketing yields: 15 000
Thus you choose to market apriori.

Aposteriori:
Expected profits if indication is g:
If marketing: Pr(H|g) * 35 000 + Pr(L|g) * 10 000 = 29 000
If not marketing: 15 000
You choose marketing.

Expected profits if indication is b:
If marketing: Pr(H|b) * 35 000 + Pr(L|b) * 15 000 = 11 870
If not marketing: 15 000
You choose not marketing.

Value of testing = Pr(g) * 29 000 + Pr(b) * 15 000 - 17 000 = 2 200
Ummmm...yeah. Sounds about right
__________________

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE
Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 11:06 AM   #144 (permalink)
Mоderatоr
 
knukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 705
iTrader: 1 / 100%
knukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEO_Mike View Post
Ummmm...yeah. Sounds about right
I added som explanatory notes:

Solution proposal assignment 7:

A quick intro to probability notation:
Pr(x|i) means the probability of x given i.
Pr(x & i) means the probability of x and i occuring together.
Pr(x) means the unconditional probability of x occuring.

Now let's solve the problem at hand:

Apriori:
A priori probabilities are the probabilities we have at hand before we conduct the PPC testing (from which we get a indication/response/signal/message):
Pr(g|H) = 0.6
Pr(b|H) = 0.4
Pr(g|L) = 0.1
Pr(b|L) = 0.9

So, e.g. Pr(g|H) is the probability of a good signal, given that the demand is high.

Needed for later:
Pr(H & g) = Pr(H) * Pr(g|H) = 0.4 * 0.6 = 0.24
Pr(H & b) = Pr(H) * Pr(b|H) = 0.4 * 0.4 = 0.16
Pr(L & g) = Pr(L) * Pr(g|L) = 0.6 * 0.1 = 0.06
Pr(L & b) = Pr(L) * Pr(b|L) = 0.6 * 0.9 = 0.54
Pr(g) = Pr(H & g) + Pr(L & g) = 0.30
Pr(b) = Pr(H & b) + Pr(L & b) = 0.70

Aposteriori probabilities:
These are the probabilities for a state of demand, given a signal response from the PPC testing. E.g., Pr(H|g) is the probability of high demand, given a good signal (g).
Pr(H|g) = Pr(H & g)/Pr(g) = 0.24/0.30 = 0.8
Pr(H|b) = Pr(H & b)/Pr(b) = 0.16/0.70 ~= 0.229
Pr(L|g) = Pr(L & g)/Pr(g) = 0.06/0.30 = 0.2
Pr(L|b) = Pr(L & b)/Pr(b) = 0.54/0.70 ~= 0.771

Optimal choices based on expected profits:
In this stage we figure out what our optimal choices are (to market or not to market), under our different possible situations. First we find out what our optimal responses are before we have a signal from testing, i.e. a priori.
Apriori:
Marketing the product yields expected profits: 0.4 * 35 000 + 0.6 * 5 000 = 17 000
Not marketing yields: 15 000
Thus you choose to market apriori, because it has higher expected profits.

Aposteriori:
This is where we check what actions are the most profitable if we conduct PPC testing and receive the different signals (good or bad indication).
Expected profits if indication is g:
If we choose marketing after a good signal from testing: Pr(H|g) * 35 000 + Pr(L|g) * 10 000 = 29 000
If not marketing: 15 000
You choose marketing.

Expected profits if indication is b:
If marketing after a bad indication: Pr(H|b) * 35 000 + Pr(L|b) * 15 000 = 11 870
If not marketing: 15 000
You choose not marketing.

Value of testing = What you are willing to spend to get the result = Difference in expected profits a posteriori and a priori = Probability of a good signal * Expected profits from our optimal choice given that signal + Probability of a bad signal * Expected profits from our optimal choice given that signal - expected profits from optimal choice a priori = Pr(g) * 29 000 + Pr(b) * 15 000 - 17 000 = 2 200
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbnj0904
keep your fucking ass shut!!
knukk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 12:13 AM   #145 (permalink)
writer extraordinair
 
writeordie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 16
iTrader: 5 / 100%
writeordie has a spectacular aura about
Wow, I just starting in AM and I never really thought about all the factors I need to consider. This site is awesome thanks a lot!
writeordie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 06:22 AM   #146 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 375
iTrader: 29 / 97%
SEOMERELIN has a spectacular aura about
i will go for option b,its the best according to mathematics
SEOMERELIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2010, 06:15 PM   #147 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
darenet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 167
iTrader: 12 / 100%
darenet has a reputation beyond reputedarenet has a reputation beyond reputedarenet has a reputation beyond reputedarenet has a reputation beyond reputedarenet has a reputation beyond reputedarenet has a reputation beyond reputedarenet has a reputation beyond reputedarenet has a reputation beyond reputedarenet has a reputation beyond reputedarenet has a reputation beyond reputedarenet has a reputation beyond repute
Just get Marketing Experiments Fundamentals of Online Testing I learned all the math about this stuff from there...

And no it's not the same type of math you learn in school.
darenet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 01:06 PM   #148 (permalink)
Internet Marketer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 284
iTrader: 0 / 0%
jbartinla has a reputation beyond reputejbartinla has a reputation beyond reputejbartinla has a reputation beyond reputejbartinla has a reputation beyond reputejbartinla has a reputation beyond reputejbartinla has a reputation beyond reputejbartinla has a reputation beyond reputejbartinla has a reputation beyond reputejbartinla has a reputation beyond reputejbartinla has a reputation beyond reputejbartinla has a reputation beyond repute
#7 is pretty slick, but you seem to be pulling a couple numbers our of the air in your equations like PPC spend, revenue and profitability.
jbartinla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 02:29 PM   #149 (permalink)
Mоderatоr
 
knukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 705
iTrader: 1 / 100%
knukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbartinla View Post
#7 is pretty slick, but you seem to be pulling a couple numbers our of the air in your equations like PPC spend, revenue and profitability.
Whether I pull them out of the air or not is not important. In fact it doesn't change anything. The whole point of such an assignment is to understand the tools you have your disposal to solve for a solution suggestion. The idea is to provide a set of information and assumptions that can be applied to solving the problem at hand. In real life investment decisions projects are also evaluated beforehand and predictions are made to calculate the projects' values. You can think of #7 as what you do after you have predicted what the relevant variables' values will be.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbnj0904
keep your fucking ass shut!!
knukk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 02:49 PM   #150 (permalink)
Mоderatоr
 
knukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 705
iTrader: 1 / 100%
knukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond reputeknukk has a reputation beyond repute
Assignment 8

You are about to launch a project that will give $ 100 000 of revenues for sure.
To be able to generate revenues you need to invest in a technology.

Technology A costs $ 30 000 in present value over the years with a capital cost of 10 %. Technology B costs you $ 20 000 (present value) in total over the years with a capital cost of 15 %.

The project lasts 5 years. There are no other costs to consider. There are no taxes.

What are the equivalent annual cost for each of the two technologies? Which technology do you choose for your project and why?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbnj0904
keep your fucking ass shut!!
knukk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ways To Learn And Make Use Of Internet Marketing Services… AndrewHall Affiliate Marketing 10 07-29-2008 09:06 PM
NOON wanting to learn from the pros. Sloopy Credit Affiliate Marketing 8 02-25-2008 02:53 AM
Blogs that you learn from Income Hero Newbie Questions 4 10-28-2007 08:00 PM
How did you learn how to program PHP/MySQL? vizilla Design, Development & Programming 41 08-13-2007 08:40 AM
PHP Vs ASP How To Choose A Web Development Language. Aequitas Design, Development & Programming 15 04-22-2007 10:07 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 PM.


WickedFire.com Copyright © 2011 - WickedFire is an international registered Trademark of Coastal Synergy LLC. You may not use any of our trademarks, copyrights, content, or images without a written approval by members of Coastal Synergy LLC.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0