Spelunking

^Gimme a break. Everyone knows a .net is just as good as a .com.

For OP. Big fucking letters: MAKE MONEY USING OUR COUPONS

Or something like that.

dreamache

There are no SEO advantages to a .com over a .net. End of story. Move on.

Enigmabomb

Don't show the Facebook window until you've got enough followers not to look ghetto.

__________________
SEO Keyword Tracking For Professionals (Or just a slob with clients)
How To Write Link Bait
Stop moving in slow motion:Full Speed SEO

g1c9

.Net = .Com for SEO, but that's not the point.

Sure, it's slickdeals.net, but every time I decide to check that site out after not having been there for a couple months I type slickdeals.com

Fatbat

Though I'm not 100% convinced, for SEO .net vs .com might not be an issue, but it's certainly an issue from a branding and marketing point of view.

The two best examples so far, slickdeals.net and themeforest.net... they both own and redirect their .coms! Wordpress.org is THE authority site for the search subject so that's a poor example.

This is a major problem that shouldn't be disregarded. Any efforts you make to promote a .net site will always be effected if someone else has the .com, simple as that. They're going to take a significant portion of your type in traffic. I would never develop a .net into anything more than a secondary SEO trap or landing page if someone else owned the .com, it's just not wise.

__________________
BRAD SHAW - GRAPHIC DESIGN [ WEB - PRINT - IDENTITY ] >>>

Fatbat

Actually fuck it, I'm sticking to my original statement that .com is better than .net for SEO purposes.

If you take two sites with the same subject matter, dialed in on page SEO, comparable number of pages, comparable content and comparable number of backlinks I believe the .com will beat the .net every time in the SERPs.

If you agree with this then you agree .com > .net for SEO purposes.

__________________
BRAD SHAW - GRAPHIC DESIGN [ WEB - PRINT - IDENTITY ] >>>

dchuk

I know it's not the same as .net vs. .com, but:



wordpress.org outranks wordpress.com for the term "wordpress"

both distinct sites, with distinct audiences...

__________________

Fatbat

I think that's because wordpress.org is the officical home of, and authority of, WordPress and contains many more pages and much more quality info (the codex for example) on anything to do with WordPress. wordpress.com contains very little content about WordPress in comparison.

Don't get me wrong though, I know it's possible to rank just about any TLD above a .com, but you're starting at a distinct disadvantage.

__________________
BRAD SHAW - GRAPHIC DESIGN [ WEB - PRINT - IDENTITY ] >>>

GerardWon

Bullshit.

Invest an entire Year on developing a real website, not a fucking LP, selling a product/service that You Alone Own and Control: and your telling me your going .net?! Keeping in mind that what your selling is in a redhot money making niche that has all the players already entrenched with dotcoms...

And your Not spending 10 bucks to also get the .com, right?

OK I believe you...

Shit gotta run, the fucking Easter Bunny's gonna be here any minute.

__________________
... Everything Else Is Just Waiting.

Senna Lives!

dreamache

What? I thought the the debate was on whether or not there are any inherit SEO advantages through the TLD .com VS .net? And my answer is no. Not whether or not I would bother registering other TLD's.

If I really really liked a name but the .com was not available and the .net was, I wouldn't be worrying about any SEO disadvantages. Might you lose a TINY percentage of typein traffic going to the .com? Yeah, but that's not what we're talking about.

Fatbat

A "TINY" bit? Really? I think it's likely that more than 60% of type in traffic will be lost to the .com.

And I still stand by my original statement; take 2 similar sites in the same niche, with similar on page SEO, similar number of pages, similar content and similar number of backlinks and the .com will outrank the .net every time.

Someone who is better at SEO than their competitor could outrank a .com with a .net, but if all things are equal, the .com will win.

I simply think it's just a bad decision to develop a .net into what is supposed to be a mainstream retail site. If I were the OP, I would be clicking on the link that is on the .com GoDaddy parking page to inquire about purchasing the name if he's really liking the singular version.

__________________
BRAD SHAW - GRAPHIC DESIGN [ WEB - PRINT - IDENTITY ] >>>

SUP3RNOVA

If you want me to refer you to a designer that has been doing some awesome work for me, shoot me a PM or uberaff on AIM.

__________________
am I allowed to link to my forum here?

NickRac

How do I search coupons?

__________________

dreamache

Do you have any evidence to back this up? If it's true then OK, but I don't see any justification for the SE's placing more value over a .com than a .net. I don't think that .com being the most popular TLD should give it more ranking weight.

This idea is confirmed in a few other places on the net:
Google rankings: .net vs .com sites Google SEO News and Discussion forum at WebmasterWorld

.com vs .net? - SEO Chat

Though I do think domains like .info are probably weighted less.

I agree with this though.

justo_tx

SEO debates aside, you're right about the brandability. Every email, blog comment or tweet I have to refer to the site as "socialdeal.net", had I been able to aquire the .com I would feel comfortable referring to the site as "socialdeal" knowing everybody would infer the .com.

__________________
With sufficient thrust, pigs can fly for a short while.

lukep

Matt Cutts saying it doesn't CONFIRMS that it does.

It has been my experience on over 500 Domains now that the .coms outrank the .orgs that outrank the .nets.... Which FAR outrank the .infos.

__________________

justo_tx

I tried, the owner blew off multiple emails from me. That may change in the very near future.

__________________
With sufficient thrust, pigs can fly for a short while.

Bofu2U

The grouping is extremely simple guys, sheesh. In terms of power straight off .com and .net are on a pretty even kiel. HOWEVER!

.com because of branding is ALWAYS the most important TLD for long-term projects UNLESS you're literally banking on just search traffic that you can capitalize once, and not worry about ever again. In terms of ranking they're extremely even, but .com holds the extra 1% (51/49 etc).

If you need branding even in the slightest, do .com.

__________________

turbolapp

Sorry if previously mentioned or if you're already doing this (apparently I'm part of the TL;DR crowd) but how about offering a further discount for retweets and likes?

So 20% off xwidgets! Get further 5% if you retweet this!

Not sure if your set up allows you to do this but you should def come up with a way to incentivize (apparently this is a real word) the social spread.

__________________
Workflowy Best Free Organizational App. Period.

pocketrockets

There is absolutely no evidence that a .com carries more weight than a .net for SEO.

.com's rule the first page listings because generally they were first to be purchased and developed and someone with a .com is also more likely to put forth greater effort toward SEO vs someone who buys the .net

Bofu2U

<devil's advocate> There's also absolutely no evidence that a .com DOESN'T carry more weight than a .net for SEO </devil's advocate>

__________________

justo_tx

Again it seems the my explanation of the concept of the site is an absolute failure. The "social spread" is already incentivized, that's the entire concept of the site. Maybe a concrete example will help:

Dreamache goes to socialdeal.net and finds a coupon for 30% off puma.com, Gary decides his friends might be interested and "Recommends" (Likes) the deal. Fatbat sees the recommendation on Gary's wall, clicks thru and buys. Gary get's 50% of the affiliate commission for the referral. (If Fatbat stopped to join SD before buying Fatbat would get 50% and Gary would get 25%).

One of the import things to note from the above examples is that Gary didn't have to buy anything to still be able to get cash back from the referred purchases of his social spread.

__________________
With sufficient thrust, pigs can fly for a short while.

pocketrockets

Yes, I should have said vice versa.

Even if a .com and .net are not completely weighted equal the difference is negligible.

That said, obviously always try to get the .com as the branding alone will pay for itself. I've seen SO many instances where someone meant to link out to a .net or .org but will accidentally put .com instead.

Everyone understands the .com extension.

Bofu2U

Exactly.

__________________

turbolapp

nah probably part of that TLDR thing.

I think this may be a little abstract. People want stuff for free and they want it now. affiliate commissions for not affiliates may not be the correct incentive. So if when they've found something they want and it says get an extra 5% off for clicking a button then why wouldn't they? It's instant gratification and no time or effort on their part. You could always combine the two as well, do the instant gratification one and then the affiliate commission so it will help with the continuation of the spread.

Edit: about your failure to explain- While I accept full responsibly for being a huge skimmer, in reality you gotta think most people land on a site and if they don't get the concept RIGHT AWAY then they're certainly not going to go searching for it. So while it's down right tacky that I continue to skim when I'm supposed to be helping out my IM buds with their sites, in truth, I'm pretty much representing the majority of your audience. :-/

__________________
Workflowy Best Free Organizational App. Period.

ncmedia

SEO wise, it may or may not make a difference.

If you're aiming to build a brand, a real brand, that is recognizable, will be here for a hell of a long time, won't be confused with other brands/businesses, you go for a .com, period. Yeah there are .orgs and deli.co... and a few other exceptions, however I've been branding for 13 years now and you'd have to be stupid imo to purposely go for a .net or .anything other than a .com - ESPECIALLY if there is already a .com out there - ESPECIALLY if that .com has something remotely close to what you are doing, and already has some seo/branding out there.

While you can outrank stuff, branding and building equity within a brand, does not happen on just seo alone, and there are but a few exceptions to the rule i.e. wordpress.org etc.

If I were you OP - I would rebrand it if it's still a fresh site/idea, get a .com and no offense but socialdeals isn't something I'd force myself to go hunt the .com for or make silly offers just get a new .com

EDIT: If you're building quick sites, it's whatever. When I build sites, they are rarely quick, rarely lil' landers, and rarely lil brands, thus for me it makes no sense to get anything but a.com.

.002.

__________________

justo_tx

Your point is dead on, I need to make sure to convey the concept to "skimmers" since that maybe the only chance I have to lure them into using the site. When I provided the example I wasn't intending to sound defensive; I know full well that I need to work on clarification. What I was doing with the example was trying to get feedback as to whether model seems worthwhile if the communication breakdown was taken out of the equation. Thanks for the feedback.

__________________
With sufficient thrust, pigs can fly for a short while.

justo_tx

Concerning all the points about .net vs. .com, I am building towards a brand, ranking difficulty or lack there of is completely secondary. Had I never heard of SlickDeals.net I probably never would have thought a .net was acceptable either and I'm definitely back in that camp again. I'm going to revisit the name with my co-founder

__________________
With sufficient thrust, pigs can fly for a short while.

Dwight Schrute

One suggestion.

Since I can't stay focused very well (ADD?) I'm overwhelmed by the number of offers available to me.

Maybe have a few "featured" deals (place the rest off the home page) and split test the featured deals based upon IP location.

__________________
"the only classes I did good in where english and business." - BlokBlok

Berto

On the instant gratification thing, I wonder if you could do instant paypal transfers to people instead of a monthly affiliate commission. There's your instant gratification.

That'd be awesome, although a tax nightmare.

As far as the site goes, I'd make the "Earn cash back on deals from your favorite brands and when your friends buy!" portion of things on the main header bar. It's not jumping out enough.

Also:



Fuck yeah. Good for you, 2 years of hard work and sucking could turn into 2 years of total balling.

__________________
Always down to buy, sell, and trade health-related links. PM Me.
I use SerpIQ and Micro Site Masters Rank Tracker