Are You Racist? - Page 5 - WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum

LazyHippy · 07-09-2007, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 Submissions

The (often hard) solution is to look at people as INDIVIDUALS and judge them accordingly.

I agree completely.

halfpc · 07-09-2007, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LazyHippy

I agree mate, but it's the influence of religion over US (and other countries') foreign policies that's - at least in part - to blame.

If it wasn't for the powerful Jewish lobby, your government wouldn't be spending your taxes on giving aid and support to the richest country in the Middle East, whilst neglecting the poorer ones. Not to mention the hypocrisy of the nuclear situation.

If it wasn't for Bush's grandfather and others backing Hitler there wouldn't have been a mass exodus of Jews to the Middle East, displacing thousands of Arabs, resulting in despair, anger and in turn terrorism. Yeah, I know that's over-simplifying things.... but greed and desire for wealth is as much to blame as religion (and I'm no fan of religion at all).

Hats off to you mate, no doubt we'll see some replies to this, I just wish I could hear the accents but I can imagine

halfpc · 07-09-2007, 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GallardoIzzy

You obviously don't live in reality.

Israel's a civilized country unlike most of its Arab neighbors. That's enough reason why the west favors Israel over its uncivilized neighbors.

Our security should follow their patterns of security which include racial profiling and we will unfold 9 out of 10 terrorist attacks. PERIOD.

here comes some truly proper American, the one that Chatmasta mistook me for. Where are you chatmasta? this is the prick you want to lay into if you still wanna be seen as protecting american interests, lol. bunch of twats.

halfpc · 07-09-2007, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Brar

You know a US Judge wrote in a Judgment -- "One Country's Terrorist is Another Country's Freedom Fighter".

Not that I disagree with your logic.

you got my respect with that first quote, indian. But but you then killed it with your own statement.

LazyHippy · 07-09-2007, 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpc

Hats off to you mate, no doubt we'll see some replies to this, I just wish I could hear the accents but I can imagine

LOL...

Before anyone else does it I'll correct myself a bit on one thing... Although the Nazi's received plenty of foreign investment/support (including from wealthy Jewish Americans) it could be argued that the situation would have been the same had they not.

halfpc · 07-09-2007, 09:05 PM

lazyhippy wrote: (and other countries')

that apostrophe is a rare example of correct english grammar, so far only I (a coon) and geekcogno are the only ones who used it in this way on this forum, afaik.
So, well done, lol

Roc-Star · 07-09-2007, 09:08 PM

Damn This Race Bait Thread is still going

halfpc · 07-09-2007, 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roc-Star

Damn

uhmm I see you still have that yeast infection of yours

LazyHippy · 07-09-2007, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joe

Eliminate terrorism?

Just how many people have died from terrorism in the US in the last 5 years?

I'm betting over the last 10 years it's a lot less than have died from inadequate healthcare.

Back to this war of terror...

3017 people died (or are missing, presumed dead) from the September 11th crimes. (They were criminal acts, not acts of war.) So far 3606 US military personnel have died in Iraq alone. (Not to mention Afghanistan, other countries' troops and the countless civilian deaths.)

Of course the soldiers are generally of a lower social demographic than the workers in the World Trade Centre, so their lives don't mean as much do they? And the Iraqi civilians.. they aren't even worth counting are they?

LazyHippy · 07-09-2007, 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpc

lazyhippy wrote: (and other countries')

that apostrophe is a rare example of correct english grammar, so far only I (a coon) and geekcogno are the only ones who used it in this way on this forum, afaik.
So, well done, lol

WTF! My grammar is shit, but that's basic stuff!

Is it different in America though? ... I know some stuff is, but other than the z's* I'm not sure what and it seems that although US-English would spell terrorise as terrorize, terrorism doesn't become terrorizm... does it?

Sure there must be an English to US-English translator somewhere....

(*Hmm that suggests something belongs to the z, but plural zs doesn't look right! Now if a group of Zs owned something....)

I need sleep I think!

GallardoIzzy · 07-10-2007, 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LazyHippy

Do civilised countries bulldoze the homes of the families of people suspected of breaking their laws?

Do civilised countries build walls to segregate people based on their ethnicity?

Do civilised countries blatantly lie to every other country on Earth about whether or not they possess nuclear weapons?

If it was an arab nation doing these things would America accept it? Even finance it?

I think you are missing the point though, the reason Israel is a more developed country is because of the support it has received from the west, not the other way around.

Israel has a damn good reason for bull dozing homes. Are you actually dumb enough to believe they bull doze homes because their bored?

Is what you call civilized? http://www.worldnetdaily.com/images2/childbomber.jpg right?

or maybe this? http://web.israelinsider.com/Static/...yboomart_0.jpg

Walls were built there to prevent terrorists from blowing themselves up and killing innocent civilians. Wake up to reality buddy.

Also, making statements such as Israel "blatantly lying" about their Nuclear weapons... Israel NEVER confirmed nor denied its Nuclear power. Which leads me to a question...Why is it that no one is concerned about Israel having Nuclear power, yet the majority of this world is worried if it's radical neighbors have Nuclear power? coincidence, no? That answers your next comment... "If it was an arab nation doing these things would America accept it? Even finance it?"

Regarding your comment "I think you are missing the point though, the reason Israel is a more developed country is because of the support it has received from the west, not the other way around." that's just something to laugh at. They are a more developed country because their children are raised with education. Not with suicide belts.

halfpc · 07-10-2007, 10:46 AM

[quote=LazyHippy;180299]So far 3606 US military personnel have died in Iraq alone. (Not to mention Afghanistan, other countries' troops and the countless civilian deaths.)
quote]

don't forget the NON american soldiers, there's plenty of them.

Perhaps this will stop once the money runs out, eg: the Yanks will move out, followed by the Brits followed by the rest, to leave a region that will organize to REALLY do what Bush & Blair feared in the first place, just this time they'll have dead relatives to revenge and nothing left to lose.

I am not siding with either. The Muslims are just as bad as the Jews and NONE of them will eat beacon which is a sin in itself!

LazyHippy · 07-10-2007, 10:57 AM

[quote=halfpc;180417]

Quote:

Originally Posted by LazyHippy

So far 3606 US military personnel have died in Iraq alone. (Not to mention Afghanistan, other countries' troops and the countless civilian deaths.)
quote]

don't forget the NON american soldiers, there's plenty of them.

Perhaps this will stop once the money runs out, eg: the Yanks will move out, followed by the Brits followed by the rest, to leave a region that will organize to REALLY do what Bush & Blair feared in the first place, just this time they'll have dead relatives to revenge and nothing left to lose.

I am not siding with either. The Muslims are just as bad as the Jews and NONE of them will eat beacon which is a sin in itself!

The money won't run out... they'll keep finding more money to plough into it - putting both the US and UK further into debt (to be repaid eventually from our taxes)... but BP, Shell, Halliburton et al will make millions more from this escapade so it's worth it isn't it?

They'll leave only to gain votes - Brown will try to distance him self from Blair's policies (as much as he can) and the next US President will do likewise...

They carry on fighting this war of terror though... not to win it, they are intelligent enough to realise it's like the cold war - it can't be won by force. They'll carry on because - like the cold war - it keeps the sheeple under control and big business happy.

halfpc · 07-10-2007, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LazyHippy

WTF! My grammar is shit, but that's basic stuff!

Is it different in America though? ... I know some stuff is, but other than the z's* I'm not sure what and it seems that although US-English would spell terrorise as terrorize, terrorism doesn't become terrorizm... does it?

Sure there must be an English to US-English translator somewhere....

(*Hmm that suggests something belongs to the z, but plural zs doesn't look right! Now if a group of Zs owned something....)

I need sleep I think!

I am not talking about spelling but the inability for many mother tongue speakers to distinguish between plurals and anglosaxon possessive, or whatever it's called, eg: John's (belonging to John) citizens' (belonging to citizens) DVDs (plural of DVD) etc.
It seems that when there's an "s" at the end, people have developed a tendence to add an apostrophe in there, you did it too while talking of Zs, lol I don't care, it's not my language and half of what I say is sarcastic anyhow.

halfpc · 07-10-2007, 11:15 AM

[quote=LazyHippy;180422]

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpc

The money won't run out... they'll keep finding more money to plough into it - .

I was reading some business paper that said the $ is at its lowest of the the last 26 years, that to me means a country that's trying to keep its economy moving, export rather than import, get its people to work for less etc... basically sqeezing the lemon, much like it has happened in 1991 when they eventually dragged half of the world into a recession.
It means that when the shit hits the fan, whoever has cash will be able to buy VERY cheap off the bankrupting lot.
I bought a house in 1992 for peanuts and lived off it till now and now it's time to sell while the turkeys think it's good to buy

but it's all speculation of course, fort knox is stuffed full I am sure..

Roc-Star · 07-10-2007, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpc

uhmm I see you still have that yeast infection of yours

I think you should take care of you mom's infection first.

halfpc · 07-10-2007, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roc-Star

I think you should take care of you mom's infection first.

uhmm, I am an orphan so it's unlikely. If your sister adopted me maybe, but I'd still need a dad. We'd have to keep the yeast in the fridge till I find one. In fact you could pass it on to her now will you? good boy, I'll tell dad you helped..

LazyHippy · 07-10-2007, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GallardoIzzy

Israel has a damn good reason for bull dozing homes. Are you actually dumb enough to believe they bull doze homes because their bored?

Is what you call civilized? http://www.worldnetdaily.com/images2/childbomber.jpg right?

or maybe this? http://web.israelinsider.com/Static/...yboomart_0.jpg

Walls were built there to prevent terrorists from blowing themselves up and killing innocent civilians. Wake up to reality buddy.

Also, making statements such as Israel "blatantly lying" about their Nuclear weapons... Israel NEVER confirmed nor denied its Nuclear power. Which leads me to a question...Why is it that no one is concerned about Israel having Nuclear power, yet the majority of this world is worried if it's radical neighbors have Nuclear power? coincidence, no? That answers your next comment... "If it was an arab nation doing these things would America accept it? Even finance it?"

Regarding your comment "I think you are missing the point though, the reason Israel is a more developed country is because of the support it has received from the west, not the other way around." that's just something to laugh at. They are a more developed country because their children are raised with education. Not with suicide belts.

I can't believe I missed this post.

Did I suggest they bulldoze homes because they are bored? Please explain this 'good reason'. I thought they did it either as collective punishment (illegal under the Geneva convention), to reassure voters that they were doing something or to ensure the status quo is maintained. (Depending on the political 'needs' of the time.)

I really shouldn't lower myself to your level, but I can't resist, sorry. Have a look here to see what happened to kids in Lebanon last year. I'm sure you are aware that Israel's is responsible for plenty of atrocities too.

By the way, criticising Israel's actions isn't excusing the actions of the terrorist/freedom fighter groups. Suicide bombings are not excusable - especially not targeting civilians - but I'm sure if the Islamic extremists had access to the sort of weaponry that Israel has they would chose to use that instead. I at no point described these extremists as civilised, so that argument is a weak one.

If the wall was truly built solely for protection, then why has in annexed Palestinian land? Again, it is illegal under international law.

Israel's policy of nuclear ambiguity is ridiculous (and yet again also possibly illegal). They are widely known to possess nuclear weapons, yet blatently lie claiming they would not be the first to "introduce nuclear weapons in the Middle East".

Many powerful people may share your views (most likely for different reasons), but "the majority of the world" being concerned about Arab states having nuclear power? Did you mean weapons? If so, then you are wrong when you claim "no one is concerned about Israel", plenty of people around the world are very concerned. I'm sure you have the intelligence to realise that and your reply certainly didn't address my question.

How about this one...

If, when the IRA was bombing London (or ETA bombing Madrid for that matter) the British government had sent helicopters and planes to drop bombs on the houses of the terrorists'/freedom fighters' families in Ireland would that have been acceptable?

If they traced the source of the funding back to New York and used military force to stop that funding would Americans have been happy with that?

minger · 07-10-2007, 07:28 PM

there is some racism but never as bad as this so stop moaning

CNN - Bride-burning claims hundreds in India - Aug. 18, 1996

Indian rape victim burned alive for testifying | The World | The Australian

Couple burned alive for black magic | Oddly Enough | Reuters

Policeman Burned Alive by Extremists in Eastern India

Terror Unbound: 14 years old Hindu child burnt alive - Attacks | hindujagruti.org

Woman burnt alive at Wokha @ NewKerala.Com News Channel

At least 17 people burned alive in western India Asian Political News - Find Articles

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Brar

Not trying to stir a controversial topic but I am just curious that how much does the race of the person matters to you? How many times have you faced it?

Freakonomics, Blink and Influence have all proved that racist biases exist -- There's no denying that. There are so many times when I see a sudden change in people's behavior when they know that I am an Indian. May I thank people like Barack Obama and John Kerry for it?

Though it has happened to me so many times that I've learnt how to ignore it and the person. It's easier to cut ties with that person because if a person doesn't respect you for who you are, there's no use in trying to change him or her.

And why am I writing it out? Yesterday, I saw the same change in a person I respected a lot and that hurt me real bad. And I really had to vent it out.

Anyway now I have it off my head. Care to share your experiences?

GallardoIzzy · 07-11-2007, 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LazyHippy

I can't believe I missed this post.

Did I suggest they bulldoze homes because they are bored? Please explain this 'good reason'. I thought they did it either as collective punishment (illegal under the Geneva convention), to reassure voters that they were doing something or to ensure the status quo is maintained. (Depending on the political 'needs' of the time.)

They bulldoze homes that belong to terrorists or homes that were used to create bombs and missiles that are aimed to hit innocent civilians. You should become a politician with your brilliant theory's. I highly doubt, in fact im quite sure that your intelligence up against the Mossad is something you can dream about.

I really shouldn't lower myself to your level, but I can't resist, sorry. Have a look here to see what happened to kids in Lebanon last year. I'm sure you are aware that Israel's is responsible for plenty of atrocities too.

I agree Israel messed up in Lebanon. It's a shame innocent civilians had to take the heat because of the radicals in that country. In war there will always be atrocities and casualties of innocent civilians. Israel never started a war, unless it was brought on to them. Had the Lebanese Army done their duties and disarmed Hizballah, this would have never happened. Had Hezballah not hid behind innocent lives and created human shields Israel would have taken them out in a heartbeat. They went in unprepared not expecting Hezballah to be the cowards they were by hiding behind woman and children. I think it will be a lesson well learned though, because next time Hezballah starts, there will be a plan in place.

By the way, criticising Israel's actions isn't excusing the actions of the terrorist/freedom fighter groups. Suicide bombings are not excusable - especially not targeting civilians - but I'm sure if the Islamic extremists had access to the sort of weaponry that Israel has they would chose to use that instead. I at no point described these extremists as civilised, so that argument is a weak one.

Are you calling these terrorists freedom fighters? You got to be out of your mind. Don't you think theres a reason Islamic extremists don't have access to the sort of weaponry Israel has? It's like giving an M16 to a 4 year old child with a mental disorder, and telling him to "go knock yourself out".

If the wall was truly built solely for protection, then why has in annexed Palestinian land? Again, it is illegal under international law.

Palestinians don't have a land. They were thrown out of every Arab country and it became Israels problem. Go research your history a bit better. Israeli tax dollars are paying and supporting the Palestinians that no Arab country wanted to take in. Don't make it Israels problem that they don't have their own state. Israels big mistake started when they negotiated land for peace. So far they gave land and no one has yet to see any peace.

Israel's policy of nuclear ambiguity is ridiculous (and yet again also possibly illegal). They are widely known to possess nuclear weapons, yet blatently lie claiming they would not be the first to "introduce nuclear weapons in the Middle East".

What are you jealous of them? Do you feel threatened?

Many powerful people may share your views (most likely for different reasons), but "the majority of the world" being concerned about Arab states having nuclear power? Did you mean weapons? If so, then you are wrong when you claim "no one is concerned about Israel", plenty of people around the world are very concerned. I'm sure you have the intelligence to realise that and your reply certainly didn't address my question.

Yes. I meant weapons, or predicting what you will probably call it in your next response "for peaceful purposes". The only people concerned about Israel having nukes are Muslims. I can't blame them for worrying though.

How about this one...

If, when the IRA was bombing London (or ETA bombing Madrid for that matter) the British government had sent helicopters and planes to drop bombs on the houses of the terrorists'/freedom fighters' families in Ireland would that have been acceptable?

Had Ireland not taken action, then hell yea it would be acceptable.

If they traced the source of the funding back to New York and used military force to stop that funding would Americans have been happy with that?

What a stupid comment. No response for that one.

halfpc · 07-13-2007, 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GallardoIzzy

What a stupid comment. No response for that one.

that's what a lamborghini is anyway

LazyHippy · 07-13-2007, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GallardoIzzy

What a stupid comment. No response for that one.

As has been said before one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter. Are you aware that the first modern Israeli government was formed by 'terrorists' who bombed the ruling British?

My comment wasn't stupid. Israel has used military force to cut off funding, and if you feel it would've been acceptable to bomb Ireland, then why not attack the sources of funding as well?

I can see we aren't going to agree on this, but at least try to see things from another point of view....

If your country was seen as the homeland of a group of people who were oppressed, they moved there on mass and the people that ran your country bowed to pressure and allowed the creation of another state there with your fellow countrymen being forced into refugee camps (many are still there in neighbouring countries btw), the rest forced to live a second class life next to a seemingly decadent neighbour, how would you feel?

I'm not jealous of Israel's nuclear capabilities, but yes I do feel threatened. You said yourself that Muslims should be concerned, implying that Israel may use these weapons. If that really is the case then the whole world should feel threatened.

Peace.

Drake · 07-13-2007, 11:31 AM

I have heard Europe in general is afraid of the feuding middle easterns of all types. Almost expecting a nuke at some time to go off. Syria and Israel have lots of love for each other.

halfpc · 07-13-2007, 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LazyHippy

I can see we aren't going to agree on this, but at least try to see things from another point of view....

this is what I used to say to traffic policemen, women, it never worked ONCE.

GallardoIzzy · 07-15-2007, 12:59 AM

HalfPC - Working on that one

The white version of the LP is hotter though!

Lazy - It's obvious that if one of Israels neighbors plan on building Nuke plants they plan on using it for NON peaceful purposes. In that case if you were nervous about Israel using Nukes, put an end or at least contribute to putting an end to it. I love how Muslims always cry after the damage was done when they could have prevented it in the first place.

Everyone knows Israel never strikes first and they ALWAYS tried using sanctions and then force as a LAST resort. That explains why the only people concerned about Israels nuke program are Muslims.

You are obviously asking to be worried about something. It's like waiving a red flag in front of a bull.

Iran who blatantly speaks about wiping Israel off the map is building nuclear plants as we speak. Do you think Israel should allow them to continue? Lets be honest here... Israel is showing pretty large restraint there. It's just a matter of time though until that last little thread rips and all hell breaks loose, because if Iran thinks they are going to wipe Israel off the map they got a nice surprise waiting for them...

Iraq 1981 *hint* *hint*

GallardoIzzy · 07-15-2007, 01:03 AM

kyleirwin · 07-16-2007, 03:26 AM

Not racist. Prejudice against slow-thinking individuals that inconvenience my life, who around here, are generally brown. But senior-drivers and white-trash in their broken down hick-mobiles piss me off equally as much.

halfpc · 07-16-2007, 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GallardoIzzy

HalfPC - Working on that one

The white version of the LP is hotter though!

Everyone knows Israel never strikes first

cars: yep, that's a "Lambo What?" aka an Audi with a Lambo tag

Israel: who came first, the egg or the chicken? I believe the first "strike" was the first passport taken off a Palestinian's hand.
Yes, they might not be very productive people but that's no reason to take their goats and passports off them, that's what started it, it was 1948 and the allies had a hot potato in their hands and didn't know what to do with it.

race: since this is a race thread and italian cars have been introduced, I'd like to put on record that the Italians that everyone know, aren't the ones who make Lambos, Ferraris, Ducatis and the rest.

This in case anyone ever wondered. The north is the style & the south is the shit.

It's a similar situation to the middle east shit, just that the northern italians are more like working bees & they will happily let anyone take advantage off them unlike jews do.
Oh and the southerners are clever mafiosi, nobbody tucha da mob, but Lambos they'll never make in a million years.

GallardoIzzy · 07-17-2007, 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpc

cars: yep, that's a "Lambo What?" aka an Audi with a Lambo tag

.

LP640 aint no Audi. The Gallardo has an Audi engine, but don't downsize the LP640.

It takes any man to ride a horse, but a real man to ride a bull

GallardoIzzy · 07-17-2007, 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpc

Israel: who came first, the egg or the chicken? I believe the first "strike" was the first passport taken off a Palestinian's hand.
Yes, they might not be very productive people but that's no reason to take their goats and passports off them, that's what started it, it was 1948 and the allies had a hot potato in their hands and didn't know what to do with it.

And no, it started when all the Arab countries chucked the Palestinians then dumped them in a place called Israel which never belonged to them to begin with. The bible is your best reference unless of course, your profit is Mohammad.

Usually the saying goes "one mans trash is another mans treasures..." Wonder what went wrong there...

halfpc · 07-17-2007, 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GallardoIzzy

It takes any man to ride a horse, but a real man to ride a bull

A bright orange or yellow Lambo was synonym with madness once, but now... they are white and made by VW? Ok. Same colour as the fridge then

Great cars, I am not dissing them but I'll stick to pre krauts.

edit: I am growing to like that LP640 arse. would have to be lemon yellow though. I think I'll use this car to motivate me since motivation is my main problem. I think I want one. They are relatively cheap too.

halfpc · 07-17-2007, 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GallardoIzzy

And no, it started when all the Arab countries chucked the Palestinians then dumped them in a place called Israel which never belonged to them to begin with. The bible is your best reference unless of course, your profit is Mohammad.

ahh if you mention the bible then throughout history every time there was a problem, it was always the jews, they even got blamed for the black death

the palestinians only came into the equation since the jews started to flood the place.

cc23 · 07-17-2007, 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DruSam

I think it's extremely hypocritical that so many blacks think it is okay for them to have All-black colleges, a black national anthem, a black television station, on and on. But I guarantee, a white version of any of those will be labeled as racist.

I think this is a very naive statement. There are not "ALL" Black colleges they are label historically black colleges and universities (hbcu) and if you do your research you would know that most were founded by whites to create ways for blacks or there biracial children to attend a university during segregation thus 95% are located in the South. Currently all of these colleges admit and accept applicants from all races and cultures however application rates of other races and ethnicities are low. (I have found out that many whites think whites are not allowed to attend these schools) Furthermore, people whom attend these schools are there for cultural reasons.

Second, a black television station (aka BET) was started with capital from a John Malone John C. Malone - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia man and in addition is now owned and operated by Viacom which is a publicly traded company. Viacom owns BET as well as MTV, Nickelodeon, Spike TV, VH1 and formally apart of CBS. Dreamworks and paramount.
Viacom
BET is no different from Spike TV (Mens TV), WE, Oxygen, telemundo etc as niche offerings to demographics not fully represented on the broadcast networks.

...However i think we all have bias and prejudices and ways of justifying them.

LazyHippy · 07-17-2007, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GallardoIzzy

And no, it started when all the Arab countries chucked the Palestinians then dumped them in a place called Israel which never belonged to them to begin with.

How people can be so closed-minded? How they cannot see things from another point of view...

Suddenly it all becomes clear...

Quote:

Originally Posted by GallardoIzzy

The bible is your best reference unless of course...

The bible was propaganda written to promote a certain cause at a certain time, it is not a historical reference book. If you are using it as such, then I guess your comments kinda make more sense.

Tell me, which do you prefer? "An eye for an eye" or "Turn the other cheek"?

You comments about Muslims are so wrong, how can you judge millions of people based on the actions of the extremists? That's like if you are a Christian me saying you are the same as Hitler or the KKK.

halfpc · 07-18-2007, 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LazyHippy

You comments about Muslims are so wrong, how can you judge millions of people based on the actions of the extremists? That's like if you are a Christian me saying you are the same as Hitler or the KKK.

hmm you may wish to fuck the pope up his arse and wear t shirts of the pope smoking dope. You can do this 50 yards from the vatican.
They will smile at you, I promise.

Try that same stunt with the muslims, see how difficult it is to find a hero that slashes your throat.

The Pope recently made a similar comment to what I am saying here, then agreed to visit Turkey. (!!)
Did you see the million turks chanting "death to the pope?" on the streets?

He put all this in a platter for everyone to see, very clever pope this one, I'd share a spliff with him alright.

geekcognito · 07-18-2007, 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpc

lazyhippy wrote: (and other countries')

that apostrophe is a rare example of correct english grammar, so far only I (a coon) and geekcogno are the only ones who used it in this way on this forum, afaik.
So, well done, lol

Ha. I noticed that not long ago. Rare, indeed. It's ok though, I guess. Proper grammar and online forums never really mixed well.

BTW, are you calling yourself a coon?

LazyHippy · 07-18-2007, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpc

hmm you may wish to fuck the pope up his arse and wear t shirts of the pope smoking dope. You can do this 50 yards from the vatican.
They will smile at you, I promise.

Might hold you to that promise next time I'm in Rome.... fuck the Pope up the arse and wait for the smiles....

... then again maybe not.

halfpc · 07-18-2007, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geekcognito

Ha. I noticed that not long ago. Rare, indeed. It's ok though, I guess. Proper grammar and online forums never really mixed well.

I noticed he's been getting all his plurals wrong after my comment, I think I embarassed him and he's been trying to turn things around

Quote:

Originally Posted by geekcognito

BTW, are you calling yourself a coon?

yeah not sure why I did because it's too long to explain the why. They called me that at work, me being Italian by birth. I meant "not bad for a spaghetti eating wop, uh?" lol.

Reverse racism, in Ali G fashion (the actor that later became Borat) he used to visit us sometimes.
It's all in good heart, meant to send a non racist message, much like Borat (in real life a jew) does when he addresses jews.

The joke has yet another twist, but I am sure nobody cares. Footage of it would be easier and still, many wouldn't get the point so what's the point.

geekcognito · 07-18-2007, 11:21 AM

Ah. No biggie or anything, I just wanted to clarify. I haven't heard anyone use that word to refer to a person outside of the deep American South in reference to an African American. Just had me curious, is all.

07-09-2007, 09:05 PM	#206 (permalink)
halfpc I love shapely Keyboards Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Venice (IT) Posts: 365 iTrader: 1 / 100%	lazyhippy wrote: (and other countries') that apostrophe is a rare example of correct english grammar, so far only I (a coon) and geekcogno are the only ones who used it in this way on this forum, afaik. So, well done, lol Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

07-09-2007, 09:08 PM	#207 (permalink)
Roc-Star GFS Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 72 iTrader: 0 / 0%	Damn This Race Bait Thread is still going Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

07-10-2007, 10:46 AM	#212 (permalink)
halfpc I love shapely Keyboards Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Venice (IT) Posts: 365 iTrader: 1 / 100%	[quote=LazyHippy;180299]So far 3606 US military personnel have died in Iraq alone. (Not to mention Afghanistan, other countries' troops and the countless civilian deaths.) quote] don't forget the NON american soldiers, there's plenty of them. Perhaps this will stop once the money runs out, eg: the Yanks will move out, followed by the Brits followed by the rest, to leave a region that will organize to REALLY do what Bush & Blair feared in the first place, just this time they'll have dead relatives to revenge and nothing left to lose. I am not siding with either. The Muslims are just as bad as the Jews and NONE of them will eat beacon which is a sin in itself! Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

07-13-2007, 11:31 AM	#223 (permalink)
Drake Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 2,268 iTrader: 21 / 100%	I have heard Europe in general is afraid of the feuding middle easterns of all types. Almost expecting a nuke at some time to go off. Syria and Israel have lots of love for each other. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

07-15-2007, 12:59 AM	#225 (permalink)
GallardoIzzy Lamborghini What? Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Miami Posts: 45 iTrader: 0 / 0%	HalfPC - Working on that one The white version of the LP is hotter though! Lazy - It's obvious that if one of Israels neighbors plan on building Nuke plants they plan on using it for NON peaceful purposes. In that case if you were nervous about Israel using Nukes, put an end or at least contribute to putting an end to it. I love how Muslims always cry after the damage was done when they could have prevented it in the first place. Everyone knows Israel never strikes first and they ALWAYS tried using sanctions and then force as a LAST resort. That explains why the only people concerned about Israels nuke program are Muslims. You are obviously asking to be worried about something. It's like waiving a red flag in front of a bull. Iran who blatantly speaks about wiping Israel off the map is building nuclear plants as we speak. Do you think Israel should allow them to continue? Lets be honest here... Israel is showing pretty large restraint there. It's just a matter of time though until that last little thread rips and all hell breaks loose, because if Iran thinks they are going to wipe Israel off the map they got a nice surprise waiting for them... Iraq 1981 hint hint Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

07-15-2007, 01:03 AM	#226 (permalink)
GallardoIzzy Lamborghini What? Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Miami Posts: 45 iTrader: 0 / 0%	Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

07-16-2007, 03:26 AM	#227 (permalink)
kyleirwin I <3 babies, money & guns Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Carlsbad Posts: 1,819 iTrader: 1 / 100%	Not racist. Prejudice against slow-thinking individuals that inconvenience my life, who around here, are generally brown. But senior-drivers and white-trash in their broken down hick-mobiles piss me off equally as much. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________ Nobody ever lost their shirt with their sleeves rolled up.

07-18-2007, 11:21 AM	#239 (permalink)
geekcognito Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 2,012 iTrader: 26 / 100%	Ah. No biggie or anything, I just wanted to clarify. I haven't heard anyone use that word to refer to a person outside of the deep American South in reference to an African American. Just had me curious, is all. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________ "Never confuse movement with action." ~Ernest Hemingway "While you have lost some money, you have also gained some knowledge. So in the end you may have not lossed at all. Good luck bro." ~ Sumitdhawan09

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode