|
|||||||
| Shooting The Shit Anything goes, seriously. Come meet and network with your peers, it's a fun way to take a break out of your busy day of posting at other boring forums. |
|
Welcome to the WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum - Internet Marketing Webmaster SEO Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
But, but... Jobs made things that flashed, made noises, and you could pinch and poke.
__________________
xMarkPro -- Ultimate Blog Network Management Streamline your marketing operations. Centralize management of domains, pages, Wordpress blogs, sponsors, link codes, media items, sales and traffic statistics, plus more! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Quote:
::emp::
__________________
Your Logical Fallacies - know them to avoid them That's because all programmers are also ninjas.(but not all ninjas are programmers) - LogicFlux Blind Ape Seo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Magic Scrapebox Lists
|
@op, both of them deserve respect. Why so frustrated about Steve Jobs death ?
__________________
Launched on 29 february-Authority Scrapebox Package #6-Auto Approve Blogs,Dofollow,High PR low obl + special scrapebox tool http://scrapeboxautoapprovelists.com Discounts only for subscribers Code:
http://scrapeboxautoapprovelists.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
*****
|
Quote:
Jobs made himself the public face of a well known company. The death of Wendy's founder Dave Thomas would have received much less coverage if he had never been in their commercials and such.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
The MVP of PPC
|
y u so mad?
It's not a popularity contest
__________________
www.twitter.com/dr_ngo |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
010001100100011101010100
|
By the coverage of both deaths, yes it was a popularity contest. Ritchies gifts to the computing world far out weigh anything Jobs gave us. The death of Ritchie is truly a sad day in the world of computing and yes the passing of Jobs was sad as well. However, Jobs stood on the shoulders of Ritchie and it's sad the world never knew it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
The MVP of PPC
|
I don't see what Steve Jobs has to do with Ritchie's Death. You can mourn Ritchie without putting down the death of another person.
Of course there's going to be more coverage of Job's death. Nearly everyone in America knew who Jobs was, maybe 2% of the American population knew who Ritchie was. Most of Ritchie's innovations were in the 70's and 80's. There's no need to "Fuck Steve Jobs" because his contributions are more well known. I'm not sure what you want, there's coverage of Ritchie's death in the news. You want a movie made on him or 14 year old girls saying RIP on their Facebook walls?
__________________
www.twitter.com/dr_ngo |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
SEMA Certified Master SEO
|
Any idiot who has a magpie-like fascination with shiny toys with a wheel and one button can be a Steve Jobs fan for making it ok to be bad at computers and internets. Guys like dmr built the foundations that let guys like Jobs polish turds, make an apple light up in the middle of them and sell them at a premium.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Banned
|
Who cares though... they're both dead and we're all atheists (I hope). They don't need grieving, grieving is a very vain act not worth the energy for scientists like ourselves. If you want to remember them fine, do it on your own, and do something productive with it. Build something or create something in their honor, but don't pettily argue on a message board about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | ||
|
Britfag
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Banned
|
As someone stated, Dennis Ritchie can be mourned perfectly, without downing the death of another person.
It's not a popularity contest as someone suggested, it's more about the niche of people that you appeal. For almost everyone that owns an iPhone, iPad or an iPod or any of those other iThings, Steve Jobs was the creator (sic) of those products. He appealed to the "consumer" part of the public. It's this same consumers that are mourning his death and hence you see such threads sprouting everywhere. People are continuously searching about Steve Jobs and hence you see blogs, websites (read marketers/webmasters) writing about him and trying to add as much content to it as possible. Whereas, Denis Ritchie, only appealed to the technical crowd. More so, the extremely technical crowd. His developments were no doubt very important for us and contribute greatly to the IT world that we see today, but that doesn't mean everyone should know about him, or for that matter, mourn his death. Dennis Ritchie was a pioneer in the computer industry on its own and there is no reason to resort to cheap tricks to highlight his accomplishments and invaluable contributions to the world. Ritchie is an absolutely historic person, among these who defined the base on which everything is running, no doubt. But I would say that Jobs' and Ritchie's legacies are not really that tied together since they were engaged in the different level of technology. Ritchie was a technologist, who developed code architectures. Steve Jobs was a technologist, a visionary who worked with the amalgamation of code architectures and design. 'nuff said. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Both deserve a lot of respect for their accomplishments. Both carried forward work others started.
<copy paste> in UNIX OS , the assembly code was machine dependent.. so,the version could not be portable.. so Ken Thompson rewrite the whole UNIX code in the new language called B.. But B missed several necessary aspects for real life programming.. so, Ritchie invented the new language called C which solved the inadequacies of B. </copy paste> The syntax of B and C look quite similar |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|