|
|||||||
| Shooting The Shit Anything goes, seriously. Come meet and network with your peers, it's a fun way to take a break out of your busy day of posting at other boring forums. |
|
Welcome to the WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum - Internet Marketing Webmaster SEO Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
To the debate? CNN.com Live
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Video - Breaking News Videos from CNN.com
CNN News Flashed my iPad that Newt is denying is affair claim. I don't care CNN. Newt has the biggest snake oil salesman characteristics. You don't get that insane/inhuman confidence from being honest and non scripted. He reminds of this ponzi scheme religious guy. I bet he's feeling smug with his $5M donation from Las Vegas Sand's Adelson. I wonder if Adelson would just freely drop that cash without wanting something in return... On average, this is an age war: Under 30 -> Ron Paul supporters who don't want the inflation tax Over 50 -> Generally, morons who want to offer entitlements and are too stupid or don't care about younger generations Every generation, on average, gets smarter. The frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex, Santorum, appears surprisingly honest but he's still a nutjob Mitt Romney is a war monger. Obama bribes the poor to vote for him with entitlements/food stamps/appealing to black pride. I still have not heard a rational choice beyond Ron Paul. Last edited by than_west; 01-19-2012 at 08:41 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2010/10/29/tests-say-americans-becoming-more-intelligent-over-the-generations-how-could-that-be
U MAD? There are exceptions like Ron Paul. I gave you a general answer. Researchers have compared scores on so-called “intelligence” tests, particularly tests that measure how well test-takers answer abstract problems, of Americans today to the scores of Americans of who took similar tests decades ago. In general, contemporary Americans – and westerners in general – score higher than did people in the early- and mid-twentieth century. (For why I say “so-called ‘intelligence tests’,” see Chs. 2 & 3 of this.) Indeed, there have been “massive gains” in scores over the twentieth century. This increase has been called the “Flynn Effect” after the scholar who first noted it. The upward surge appears to have leveled off more recently, but the long-term change is dramatic. (For a sample of readings, see James Flynn’s book here, and these sources: here and here.) The score of the average American test-taker in 2000 would have qualified him or her as a “genius” a few generations earlier. Just look at the numbers. Obviously, correlation doesn't mean causation but I stand by my theory that the younger population gets it. Old guys, generally, don't get why Ron Paul is the best choice. Most humans are herd-like in behavior. Older people are generally more stubborn but I need science to support this. Numbers don't lie. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
why do I go to jail if I say lies in my LP, but they get given the reigns of the largest economy in the world?
Me no understand?
__________________
Hit me up for bulk Herbal Incense. The potent kind that works. $2k/1000g - Sell it for $5-22/Gram, That's 1000% Profit! Much lower prices for bigger purchases. No banned substances, 50 states legal, includes lab certificate. PM me for info. ![]() If a trash collector can make 7 digits on this, you can too. To read more about this, view this bloomberg article. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Goober Gay
|
Any faith I had in RP to win gets diminished with every debate I watch. He isn't given time because he never talks about specific issues that people in that state want to hear about. Any time he's asked a specific question, his response is :
"Well we can fix that by transforming our governments philosophy and quit being the policemen of the world!!!" He sounds like a broken record at this point. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Quote:
for example, he'll say things like "liquidating debt" and "sound money", I'd bet 80% of people watching don't know what either of those phrases mean. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
ride dat wave
|
Quote:
This cult of personality/popularity contest is a joke. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) |
|
Señor Member
|
hahaha Paul nutted on Santorum (do not MAKE A MENTAL PICTURE) on the abortion question. Also, great hearing the loud boos from the crowd when they tried to skip Paul on that question.
__________________
Last edited by cougarclaws; 01-19-2012 at 10:29 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) |
|
Face Value
|
I feel that Paul is way to passive when it comes to getting a chance to speak. So many times I notice that when one of them finishes speaking, another tries to but in and show his point of view. Paul on the other hand simply waits off to the side for a question to be directly addresses to his name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) |
|
Goober Gay
|
My thoughts on how each candidate performed:
Paul - typical, average performance. Not good for him. Romney - bolstered support for the free enterprise movement despite being pretty well attacked about Romneycare. Good debate for him. Santorum - he's actually doing well given the low amount of credibility/funding he's received. Tonight went well for him. Newt - the crowd clearly liked him and he really got things started, but by the end of the debate I forgot his name. Average performance, no shot at the title. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
MY CLICK IS SWIFT
|
Quote:
paul, although he was his same old self, actually got to answer some meaningful questions in regards to his campaign. im a bit biased but i would say he won the debate, with newt a close second. I thought tonight was a huge disappointment for romney, the crowd really wasnt that into him, and a lot of voters may switch their vote after tonight. santorum - why is this guy still running? agreed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) |
|
WF Bronze Member
|
I've been watching the CNN post debate recap for 40+ minutes now and somehow they have managed to bring up:
Romney: 87 times Gingrich: 82 times Santorum: 76 times Ron Paul: 0 times They have literally avoided even saying his name. Nothing. Zero. I know I shouldn't be surprised at less coverage but holy fuck not a single mention? |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 (permalink) | |
|
no matter what
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) | |
|
WF Premium Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|