The Global Communist Criminals Are Taking Over The U.S. Military

hellblazer

hellblazer

New member
Sep 20, 2008
3,019
86
0
It's been a while since I dropped some truth here, because quite frankly you deluded drones don't really deserve it. Even normally rational guerilla is sounding rather deranged. But here it is regardless.

If Obama wins a second term, it's basically over. The power grabs they have already done will be consolidated, and the next ones they do will be more violent and far more encompassing. 8 years of Communist encroachment are enough for the takeover of any nation, even the esteemed United States.

By my count, there are already five individuals who have died under suspicious circumstances related to the Communist Apparatus behind the polished Orator known as Barack; Kam Kuwata, Andrew Breitbart, Donald Jones, Larry Bland, Nate Spencer. And you could feasibly add Wheeler to that list as well. Murders generally translate to escalation in tactics and methodology, which are 100% guaranteed to skyrocket even more if a second term occurs. For you good little liberals thinking it's just the far-rightwingers who will meet their just deserts, Kuwata was a big Democrat political operative. But I'm sure he was just one of those "bad" Democrats.

It is within this context that I present plans of the Global Communist Apparatus to seize control of the U.S. military and place it under the dominion of an international union. This will take some time, which is why a second term is imperative for them. But we are already now slowly seeing the groundwork being laid.

Finally, for those ostriches with their ass up in the air and their head in the sand who wish to pollute this thread with their psychological vomit, fuck off. Listening to you is about as useful as listening to a Stockholm syndrome victim. You don't want to heed the truth, fine, there's plenty of bridges in this country and plenty of funeral parlors who need an economic "stimulus". It's time to be patriotic.

The Global Communists Are Taking Over The U.S. Military

UM: Can we go back to what you mentioned about the conflict with the military – the tension between the military and the Obama administration. You told me to look into Task Group 120, right? How that was part of the plan to try and unionize the military.

WSI: Yes – and you did a good job of quickly locating that information.

UM: I want to confirm with you here what I uncovered – can you do that for me? Confirm I’m on the right track here?

WSI: Certainly.

UM: So this Task Group 120 – it’s a NATO thing. Has some UN ties as well of course. Came about the same time Obama becomes president. Is that right?

WSI: Yes.

UM: It was – a lot of it had to do with forming a Human Resources policy for these multi-national military operations. Correct?

WSI: Again – yes. You have it.

UM: And the union angle – it was pushed in the Task Group 120 report. I saw that. What I don’t quite get – what I didn’t see clearly connected was the push to unionize the American military from that report. It hinted at it – but it wasn’t right out in front. At least not to me.

WSI: That’s how these things are done. Slowly. Slowly. Then it simply becomes part of the discussion and before you know it – that discussion has turned into the reality. Task Group 120 is very much part of that process. Note how much time is devoted to – I believe the actual term within that report was “disparity in salary and benefits” between various NATO forces. Make no mistake here – Barack Obama is absolutely devoted to the idea of unionizing the American military. And not just that – but having it join with an international union no less. That is among the primary factores being laid out within that Task Group 120 study. And the evidence of that is happening right in front of you – and it seems once again you are missing it.

UM: What?

WSI: Afghanistan. The Koran controversy. It has been manipulated from the outset.

UM: How so? It’s – it’s related to unionization?

WSI: How unfortunate for those American soldiers, yes? To be blamed for such a thing? And then the ones who have been killed during the backlash. The unintended destruction of some copies of a book that had already been damaged by the very individuals now claiming to have been wronged? And Barack Obama and high ranking military giving promises that those responsible will be made accountable? They wish to punish our own military? Make an example of them? If only those soldiers had proper representation to protect them – right? Now think on that. Those soldiers…the American operation in Afghanistan is now a near-fully integrated international operation, correct?

UM: Is it? I wasn’t aware of that.

WSI: It is. And this controversy will provide two things – an excuse to withdraw and justification for setting up a proper system by which soldiers can be protected from unfair blame. The withdrawal scenario will further the idea that America should not involve itself militarily unless it is part of an international force – we are tired of doing it all ourselves, right? That increased involvement as part of an international force requires of course a new set of rules by which the American military is to function. That is Task Group 120. And of course, we must do something about the economic disparity between soldiers of one country vs soldiers of another country – yes? That is Task Group 120. That is unionization.

It’s already begun. Barack Obama – his people, those behind him…those who placed him in power – they are now rolling this agenda out. It is happening now. And even you, who are to be watching all of this – you did not see it. That is how…how well they are engaging all of this. It has been rather impressive.

If they get a second term…if the United States bestows upon Barack Obama four more years – the unionization of our military will likely then be completed. All out of fairness and compassion for the soldiers of course.

UM: The healthcare costs - the increases to the military. That has to be linked to this as well.

WSI: Absolutely. The very people who are initiating that proposal are then creating an environment in which soldiers will be demanding union protection.
Again – impressive how they are going about it all.
Click to expand...
 


The article you linked to illustrated a point I learned in Highschool; Find out who you aren't allowed to criticize and the true rulers will be exposed!

WSI: Not often…but sometimes you…such a question indicates this is a political matter for the Jewish nation. Politics? Really? Would you think so little of what Israel now faces? Iran…a people ruled by religious fanatics who openly call for the complete and total destruction of Israel. Is such a…is such a condition politics? No – it is survival. THAT is what the Jewish people face now. Have faced for some time. This president is playing politics yes – Barack Obama and those around him…yes. Playing politics with every man, woman, and child living in Israel. This president worries over gas prices with little regard to the impact those prices have on Americans, but only through the prism of how those prices may hurt his short term political outlook. He has created the dynamic, and yes, some will use it against him – as they should.
But…the Jewish nation is not involved in that game…for them this is no game. This is life or this is death. And that truth appears to be of far less concern to Mr. Obama.
Click to expand...


Who has historically been behind communism? Follow the money!!!!







jewmoney.jpg
 
Was just reading about the 3 gay dudes that were members of obamas church that he allegedly made sweet love with.

All 3 died within 6 weeks of each other, 2 from multiple gunshot wounds.

Kind of bizarre.

p.s. I too miss the HB threads.

Absence makes the heart grow fonder. <3
 
  • Like
Reactions: hellblazer
Hellblazer,

Here's a multiple choice for you.

Do you,

A) Plan to do something about it?

B) Derive immense joy from death, the end, fear, X is taking over the world?

C) Talk, talk and talk some more until we're all old fags in the senior home?

If you choose B or C, you're literally playing a violin which only exists on the nano scale. If you choose A, we're all ears on how you plan to productively address this issue.
 
The following is an honest summary:

1. Hellblazer opens up with an arrogant intro where he belittles his audience to establish credibility
2. Hellblazer wants to explain the "Apparatus to seize control of the U.S. military and place it under the dominion of an international union"
3. Random conversational circular bullshit that provides no supporting evidence but is a circle back to the same conclusion.

Summary: Hellblazer posts circular logic and overuses adjectives and adverbs

My comments:
Obama is a clearly an idiot and terrible at money management, and has a terrible grasp of economics just like many left wingers. I agree. Still, go easy on the long-winded posts and you'll get better reception. Use data instead of belittling.
 
@than_west: Spot on assessment... But you should check out some of hellboy's past threads too. Today's was a pretty lame one as far as he goes; usually he posts something like a youtube clip of some old Russian swearing an oath that Obama is an actual soviet communist... Classic stuff.

& LOL @ Tag, excepting of course that it gives HB WAY too much credit.
 
And as usual, not a single refutation of ANY of the facts posted. For the newbies here, this is why I generally spend less and less time here, because too much truth and logic triggers the morons' attack chips, which confuses the truly objective observers and generally detracts from the core message. In short, it's an intentional strategy by them because they can literally do nothing else.

As for zimok, you're dreaming if you think I would ever tell a euro fag like you what actions I'm taking. But nice pathetic try at attempting to delegitimize all of the truth in this thread, such as the fact that Obama is a drug-addicted, pole-smoking communist fag, whose Controllers are literally willing to kill anyone who will stand in the way of their goal of worldwide communist domination.

Obama's church was famously known as a place to match up gay black males with difficult black women who couldn't find husbands. These women were known as "beards". It gave the males cover and the females respect in the larger community, while of course allowing all the men to continue in their orgy of gay sex, all within the safe confines of that hellhole known as Trinity church.
 
WSI: Afghanistan. The Koran controversy. It has been manipulated from the outset.
Click to expand...

I don't know what you're hollering about, but this statement caught my attention. If this interview is meant to add credibility, then this accusation hurts your source.

He means to imply that "they" - some contracted agent stationed at the forward position - planted the koran so that the soldier would accidently burn it, and then fed the information to the local populace ensuring a media-worthy response?

If you know anything about the military, you'll know that those of us who have been in for some time can get a little disgruntled. Those who don't know how to manage it might snap off at the wrong person and be punished for it by losing rank. Now you have a 4-6 year serviceman with multiple deployments who holds the authority of a boot. And guess what this shithead just got tasked with? Cleaning the detainee facility. It's the classic case of the blue falcon; one solider buddy fucking another by not paying attention or giving a shit.

I have no interview to support this non-issue. Being out here during the incident is credit enough.

This is the only point I care to debate.

Oh look, my 10th post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom