|
|||||||
| Shooting The Shit Anything goes, seriously. Come meet and network with your peers, it's a fun way to take a break out of your busy day of posting at other boring forums. |
|
Welcome to the WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum - Internet Marketing Webmaster SEO Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
![]() |
I am planning to start a competition for my "customer relationship management" staff -- where if they reach $10,000 in profits in next 6 months, I will get them a Motorcycle / Scooter of their choice or give them equivalent amount of cash.
To make things interesting, I am extending this contest. But there I have to make a choice -- should I be fostering individual performance or team work... There are two things I can do -- a. Give them a reward of a iPhone / Equivalent Cash if they reach $15,000 in Profits and get 95% Positive Feedback from all of their accounts individually. b. Give them a reward of a iPhone / Equivalent Cash if they reach $30k in Profits Combined and get 95% Positive Feedback from all their accounts individually. If you were to do something like this, will you reward a team performance or individual performance. It might also help to know that the total number of full-time employees on roll are 5.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Pwner.
|
Truthfully, it really depends on your team, and you'll probably have the best idea of whether or not your emps are there for the individual effort or if they work well enough to rely on each other to make a goal happen.
Individual Pro's: Ensures that the top performers will get an extra bonus for their efforts. Con's: Can create a negatively competitive environment, especially if one or more employees feels like they're at a natural disadvantage for one reason or another. Group / Team Pro's: Can mobilize the entire team, creating leaders out of top performers that want to see that bonus / reward by assisting the weaker elements. Can create a better group dynamic. Con's: Failure to reach the goal can be catastrophic on the team, and force your top performers to resent the poorer players in your group. In my experience, if you can frame it right, the teamwork / team goal is the better choice, because it forces the future leaders of your organization to the surface. However, set the goal high but not so high that they can't reach it - a team failure is extremely bad for morale.
__________________
"If you ain't first you're last..." ... "Oh hell, Son, I was high that day. That doesn't make any sense at all, you can be second, third, fourth... hell you can even be fifth." |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Seo Services
|
For me its always a team effort in an organisation, every one contributes for an individual success as well.
__________________
:: Send FREE text message in US and Canada :: Check out WF's Best Manual submission Service Best Social bookmarking and Article submission service Contact: AIM: deepharvesting email: [email protected] |
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
![]() |
I would strongly advice against the individual price though, as especially if you set a team price, everyone will help everyone else, so even the "best perfomer" might be just the lucky one who closed the deal, who got contacted after a redesign, etc...
I remember being in a team where one person would get recommended for the team effort. Bad feelings for the rest of the team, he was not feeling too good with that either but was too timid to speak up against it. Not good. The pointy haired boss? He never noticed. ::emp::
__________________
Your Logical Fallacies - know them to avoid them That's because all programmers are also ninjas.(but not all ninjas are programmers) - LogicFlux Blind Ape Seo |
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
Haha sounds like an essay I've written just recently for uni...
Surveys (don't have a source but could dig it out) suggest employees of western (individualistic) background would be happy with 10-15% of their remuneration based on team performance. (Less collective (i.e. eastern, to overgeneralise), feel it should be more like 30%+). So, if you get the balance wrong... too much and people are more likely to get very sensitive to the amount of work others put in. Too little, and it can get competitive. So, depends on what the work is, specifically, and how much each employee supports others. The more they rely on each other for support, opinions, advice, covering each other when they're at lunch, etc, the more it should be collective rewards. If you go individual, just make sure they don't scramble over each other to get to their own goals, pulling the others down at the same time. If you go collective, someone will most likely 'social loaf' (see wikipedia). Could you go halfway? Some individual rewards (i.e. iphone), and some collective (i.e. cash to all)? ...is this ongoing, or a one-time offer for the next 6 mths? Let us know how it goes! Last edited by Skittled; 10-31-2007 at 01:38 AM.. Reason: new line for clarity |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| tHE difference between prison and work | John | Shooting The Shit | 4 | 09-13-2007 01:23 PM |
| Funny Commercials | Jon | Shooting The Shit | 0 | 01-11-2007 01:33 AM |
| Ready to do something with your blog? | Jan | Shooting The Shit | 12 | 10-04-2006 03:04 PM |
| WickedFire Affiliate Program!! | Jon | Shooting The Shit | 52 | 09-25-2006 08:31 AM |
| Site SEO Review of Work Boxers | Bookworm-seo | Traffic & Content | 2 | 07-15-2006 11:31 PM |