Its True... - WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum

s1ick · 12-03-2007, 06:23 AM

According to the same 2006 Playboy/Trojan Study there is a significant variation between nationalities. (See Chart Below)

Kenya 8.07 in
Nigeria: 7.9 in
South Africa: 7.85 in
Uganda 7.67 in
Kenya 7.55 in
Brazil 7.4 in
Morocco 7.37 in
Sudan 7.3 in
Egypt 7.1 in
Costa Rica 7 in
Saudi Arabia 7 in
Iran 6.95 in
Sweden 6.9
Turkey 6.9 in
Pakistan 6.75 in
Switzerland 6.72 in
Germany 6.7 in
Israel 6.7 in
Russia 6.67 in
Mexico 6.65 in
Italy 6.65 in
Spain 6.6 in
Canada: 6.5 in
Argentina 6.5
France 6.4 in
India 6.32 in
Greece 6.2 in
United States 6.1 in
Poland 6.15 in
Australia: 6 in
Sri Lanka: 5.7 in
Japan: 5.5 in
Malaysia: 5.4 in
Thailand 5.4 in
Loas: 5.35 in
China: 5.2 in
Vietnam: 5.1 in
Philippines: 4.9 in

http://wikiafterdark.com/index.php/Understand_Penis_Size

S1ick

Ajay · 12-03-2007, 08:35 AM

Australia: 6 in = YEAH SOFT!

turbolapp · 12-03-2007, 08:43 AM

Wow. Sucks to be Philippino.

mikeymike · 12-03-2007, 09:38 AM

damn I must have some Kenyan in me

sleepylee · 12-03-2007, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeymike

damn I must have some Kenyan in me

Don't keep it up there or you'll be needing nappies sooner rather than later.

Uzzz · 12-03-2007, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeymike

damn I must have some Kenyan in me

whats his name

springer · 12-03-2007, 01:22 PM

Quote:

United States 6.1 in

Some girls like 'em that wide.

Jondoe0069 · 12-03-2007, 01:27 PM

I watch enough porn to know that this is pretty accurate.

nachoninja · 12-03-2007, 01:43 PM

its the magnetic pull from being so close to the equator

Insomniac · 12-03-2007, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ajay

Australia: 6 in = YEAH SOFT!

Nah, thats about right, you gotta remember all that ~10% of Australia is made up of 3" Asians, they screw with our 8" average.

m0rtal · 12-03-2007, 02:29 PM

The bigger it is simply means the females of that race were bigger sluts.

turbolapp · 12-03-2007, 02:46 PM

Only in WF would a discussion about the statistical geo-demographics of penis sizes make the questionably correlative jump to women of certain ethnicites being sluts.

nachoninja · 12-03-2007, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbolapp

Only in WF would a discussion about the statistical geo-demographics of penis sizes make the questionably correlative jump to women of certain ethnicites being sluts.

Someone post stats of vag sizes from around the world - it probably correlates

m0rtal · 12-03-2007, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbolapp

Only in WF would a discussion about the statistical geo-demographics of penis sizes make the questionably correlative jump to women of certain ethnicites being sluts.

LOL, no it's true though. The men had to throw it in deeper in order to make offspring. Since the women were promiscuous the male tools had to "evolve". Can't remember where I saw it but best I could do right now was on wiki:

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2007 March 9 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Hypothesese (sp) I've heard for penis size have tended to focus on 1)sexual position demanded by an upright posture altering the female form and 2)promiscuity, in that more promiscuous species tend to have longer penises (among other things) to try to get their sperm to the egg first. Skittle 16:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC)"

turbolapp · 12-03-2007, 03:52 PM

Way to back it up on the fly, mortal! I must say I'm slightly impressed. Now that you put it in that context, I remember learning in my Evolutionary Psychology class that at one time, the females of the primitive human species were believed to have been "promiscuous" due to the desire to insure that there was a wide and deep (so to speak) gene pool and thereby decreasing the chance genetic mutations. The females would choose from the available selection, the fittest of the bunch, also increasing the chances of fit offspring. They would tend to stay close to fathers and brothers to ensure their safety so there really were no "mate/husbands" at that time.

This is all just theory though, not sure how they support these hypotheses.

Deliguy · 12-03-2007, 05:51 PM

6.1" - United States
Way to bring us down turbolapp

If we all work hard we can bring up that average.

*back to my daily cock pushups*

Deliguy · 12-03-2007, 05:54 PM

just noticed something...why is kenya on there twice with two different numbers?

12-03-2007, 06:23 AM	#1 (permalink)
s1ick Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 71	Its True... According to the same 2006 Playboy/Trojan Study there is a significant variation between nationalities. (See Chart Below) Kenya 8.07 in Nigeria: 7.9 in South Africa: 7.85 in Uganda 7.67 in Kenya 7.55 in Brazil 7.4 in Morocco 7.37 in Sudan 7.3 in Egypt 7.1 in Costa Rica 7 in Saudi Arabia 7 in Iran 6.95 in Sweden 6.9 Turkey 6.9 in Pakistan 6.75 in Switzerland 6.72 in Germany 6.7 in Israel 6.7 in Russia 6.67 in Mexico 6.65 in Italy 6.65 in Spain 6.6 in Canada: 6.5 in Argentina 6.5 France 6.4 in India 6.32 in Greece 6.2 in United States 6.1 in Poland 6.15 in Australia: 6 in Sri Lanka: 5.7 in Japan: 5.5 in Malaysia: 5.4 in Thailand 5.4 in Loas: 5.35 in China: 5.2 in Vietnam: 5.1 in Philippines: 4.9 in http://wikiafterdark.com/index.php/Understand_Penis_Size S1ick __________________

12-03-2007, 08:43 AM	#3 (permalink)
turbolapp Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Houston, TexASS Posts: 2,950	Wow. Sucks to be Philippino. __________________ So your earnings methods are slighty shady. Stop worrying about being dropped from your network and go with a network that's actually owned by a black hat. Makes sense, doesn't it?

12-03-2007, 09:38 AM	#4 (permalink)
mikeymike You like popsicles Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 106	damn I must have some Kenyan in me __________________

12-03-2007, 01:27 PM	#8 (permalink)
Jondoe0069 Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 636	I watch enough porn to know that this is pretty accurate. __________________

12-03-2007, 01:43 PM	#9 (permalink)
nachoninja Love the dog Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Fleshlightville Posts: 3,275	its the magnetic pull from being so close to the equator __________________ Copeac is King

12-03-2007, 08:35 AM	#2 (permalink)
Ajay Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 231	Australia: 6 in = YEAH SOFT!

12-03-2007, 02:29 PM	#11 (permalink)
m0rtal King of the Jungle Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Toronto Posts: 798	The bigger it is simply means the females of that race were bigger sluts. __________________ twinkle twinkle little star

12-03-2007, 02:46 PM	#12 (permalink)
turbolapp Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Houston, TexASS Posts: 2,950	Only in WF would a discussion about the statistical geo-demographics of penis sizes make the questionably correlative jump to women of certain ethnicites being sluts. __________________ So your earnings methods are slighty shady. Stop worrying about being dropped from your network and go with a network that's actually owned by a black hat. Makes sense, doesn't it?

12-03-2007, 03:52 PM	#15 (permalink)
turbolapp Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Houston, TexASS Posts: 2,950	Way to back it up on the fly, mortal! I must say I'm slightly impressed. Now that you put it in that context, I remember learning in my Evolutionary Psychology class that at one time, the females of the primitive human species were believed to have been "promiscuous" due to the desire to insure that there was a wide and deep (so to speak) gene pool and thereby decreasing the chance genetic mutations. The females would choose from the available selection, the fittest of the bunch, also increasing the chances of fit offspring. They would tend to stay close to fathers and brothers to ensure their safety so there really were no "mate/husbands" at that time. This is all just theory though, not sure how they support these hypotheses. __________________ So your earnings methods are slighty shady. Stop worrying about being dropped from your network and go with a network that's actually owned by a black hat. Makes sense, doesn't it?