Airport Body Scanners Revisited: Would You Comply? - WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum

Trademark · 02-03-2010, 06:12 PM

Interesting development (to me, at least). Heathrow and Manchester have launched their body scanners...

Full body scanners introduced at Heathrow and Manchester airports as Lord Adonis seeks to allay privacy fears | Mail Online

That's not the interesting part, of course. The first part that got my attention is the repeal of the "don't scan the youngsters" rule. Wonder where that decision will go when future generations of the BSIs are launched.

The second part was that those who refuse to comply are being banned from flights. There's no... "dude, just pat me down really, really good and jam the wand in the corners" option. No full scan, no plane ride (if you're chosen).

For those of you who are against this sort of thing, would you comply to catch your flight? If your 13-year-old daughter is chosen, would that make you less open to the idea?

Keep in mind the folks choosing people for scanning aren't crack CIA agents with decades of experience in behavioral tendencies. This guy may actually be such an agent, but I'm guessing no...

So... would you comply?

papajohn56 · 02-03-2010, 06:32 PM

I'd walk through naked and tell them to lick my taint

Fat Tom · 02-03-2010, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papajohn56

I'd walk through naked and tell them to lick my taint

This.

But this has some ups and down. the hey we need to scan your 13 year old daughter.. i could see shit like this on the news in a few years, "Airport body scanner caught with 1,000's of images of underage children" but this might beef up airport security to a point of where it might be. Eh who the fuck knows.

ricdes · 02-03-2010, 07:09 PM

airport security in Gatwick was hilarious this january. They had another security set up before boarding the plane. Fucking long lines and delays bc 51% of people had to get their hand lugagge manually checked. This doesn't make any sense.

About those scanners.. well i personally dont give a shit if they need me to do that before boarding. BUT I'd not board the plane if they'd want to check my little sister in that crap and rather make a huge case about it in the press.

People need to man up and realize that we cannot live in a 100% secure society without giving up our privacy. I rather have a 0.01% risk of being blown up on a plane, train, wherever than just having my whole life protocolized (fucking UK). I'm sick of seeing constitutions being crippled because some dude tried to blow up some plane. In the 70's we would've rioted if some crappy politician would've wanted to do 5% of what they have implemented now.

We're giving up way too many rights so that politicians can say that they at least did something against it when the next plane blows up. Lets just be honest here: If someone wants to blow up a plane and if he's a smart dude, he'll ALWAYS find a way to do it.

1984

// rant end

iPwnNoobs · 02-03-2010, 07:09 PM

stick to racial profiling

Falian · 02-03-2010, 07:29 PM

In next years news: Terrorists have now resorted to shooting heat-guided missiles at commercial airplanes. In order to combat this, the TSA is requiring all airplanes to be escorted by two military jets. This is expected to increase ticket costs by about 200%.

jryan21 · 02-03-2010, 07:38 PM

Wait about 10 years and it will be revealed that the real purpose of the scanners was not to search for explosives or weapons, but to selectively sterilize part of the population.

SeoReborn · 02-03-2010, 07:42 PM

Well in a news article, they are saying that the 'flaw' in the scanner is that it cannot see inside a man or woman and that recently there is intelligence that terrorists are looking to insert bombs inside their bodies!

problem creation -> reaction -> solution!

Trademark · 02-03-2010, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeoReborn

Well in a news article, they are saying that the 'flaw' in the scanner is that it cannot see inside a man or woman and that recently there is intelligence that terrorists are looking to insert bombs inside their bodies!

problem creation -> reaction -> solution!

Dang. I was just about to suggest that if I were running a training cell in the Pashtun, I'd be telling my recruits to bend over. For the equipment. For the bomb stuff.

ricdes · 02-03-2010, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Falian

In next years news: Terrorists have now resorted to shooting heat-guided missiles at commercial airplanes. In order to combat this, the TSA is requiring all airplanes to be escorted by two military jets. This is expected to increase ticket costs by about 200%.

lol see, thats another thing im talking about. if they want to bring your plane down, they will.

Nostalgae · 02-03-2010, 09:20 PM

Why are these scanners a problem for anyone in general and why is it a special problem for kids? The image is not erotic or pornographic in my opinion.. (?)

Also how are people supposed to bring marijuana along now?

subigo · 02-03-2010, 10:51 PM

Fuck airports. If a train doesn't go there, neither do I.

supersundas · 02-03-2010, 10:59 PM

I think Mr. Pedobear will find himself working at the airport now

Netphase · 02-04-2010, 03:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iPwnNoobs

stick to racial profiling

It works for Israel.

sgtryan · 02-04-2010, 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nostalgae

Why are these scanners a problem for anyone in general and why is it a special problem for kids? The image is not erotic or pornographic in my opinion.. (?)

Also how are people supposed to bring marijuana along now?

Fedex overnight to destination hotel.

emthree · 02-04-2010, 04:23 AM

I'm a former DHS employee and I just want to say that if a person is chosen for additional screening from one of these machines it's with due cause. These machines are already serving their purpose by scaring the flying public and raising paranoia. Chances are if you think you're going to be scanned ahead of time, you wont be walking with anything artfully concealed.

amanda11 · 02-04-2010, 04:27 AM

1. My balls are going to get sterilized from those machines

2. The old trick of sticking a bag of weed up your asshole in the airport doesn't work anymore

3. Fuck planes, I'll take a cruise ship.

subigo · 02-04-2010, 04:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amanda11

3. Fuck planes, I'll take a cruise ship.

Good choice. Trains for anything in North America and ships for anything overseas. Hell, you can ride the Queen Mary 2 on a transatlantic trip in just 7 days, for less than $1k, with a nice room and Internet access. I've seen the trip as low as $350 during off-peak times.

PowPow · 02-04-2010, 05:49 AM

This doesn't bother me I hate flying, fuck if I'm getting on a plane.

Don't xrays make you serial? I thought that was why when you get xrayed in hospitals they get you to cover your balls.

emp · 02-04-2010, 08:07 AM

They just had an expert on a TV show here in Germany.

He was able to smuggle all parts needed to bring a plane down without the scanner even showing it.

Thing is, these scanners detect differences in heat given off from your body. That is why items will show up (normally their edges), because they have a different heat diffusion from the rest of your skin.

Doesn't work with anything you got in a cavity (so yeah, you can still bend over for that marihuana smuggling), and it didn't even work with items in a loose fitting pocket.

I guess plastic explosive rolled out very fine and sewn into loose fitting clothes won't show up either.

You are trading your privacy for lies and bullshit, not security.

::emp::

rogerrabbit · 02-04-2010, 08:54 AM

I personally have no objection to being 'scanned.' I really have nothing to hide so if some remote person sees what I look like under my clothing, why do I care?

Privacy, blah, blah, blah. If it's preventing someone from blowing up my flight, why not? I think I just value security a hell of a lot more than privacy. If they manually search my luggage, that's a huge inconvenience. But guess what, there's nothing in there that can get me in any type of trouble. In fact, whenever I'm packing my carry on, I make sure to throw in anything embarrassing I can think of to make it awkward. Why pack a a few condoms when you can pack a few boxes? etc.

Chillax.....

__Leo__ · 02-04-2010, 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iPwnNoobs

stick to racial profiling

Quote:

Originally Posted by Netphase

It works for Israel.

No wonder we have the safest airline lol.

Quote:

(CBS) What’s the safest airline in the world?

There's no question. It's El Al, Israel’s national airline.

What’s the safest airport? Ben Gurion, Israel’s international airport.

It's ironic, when you figure that Israeli aviation has been the single most desirable target for terrorists since the 1960s. Correspondent Bob Simon reports.

What do the Israelis do that the Americans don’t do? Well, they’ve had sky marshals since the 1960s. And racial profiling.

Old article tho The Safest Airline - 60 Minutes - CBS News

kingfish · 02-04-2010, 12:59 PM

Sure thing they can see my naughty bits if they want wtf do I care. Probably they don't want to see them anyway though

One day we're all going to have to fly naked after after a long wait while we ingest lots of laxatives.

Trademark · 02-04-2010, 02:12 PM

As if on cue...

Bosom bombers: Women have explosive breast implants

** I realize WND posts some crazy stuff. So, the above story may be fabricated or misguided. But, you have to admit... it's not that hard to believe.

Benji49 · 02-04-2010, 02:47 PM

One of the reasons I went into internet marketing was to avoid plane travel. I flew a lot on business in the early 2000s around the time of 9/11.

It sucked back then. I can't imagine what's like now.

SeoReborn · 02-04-2010, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogerrabbit

I personally have no objection to being 'scanned.' I really have nothing to hide so if some remote person sees what I look like under my clothing, why do I care?

Privacy, blah, blah, blah. If it's preventing someone from blowing up my flight, why not? I think I just value security a hell of a lot more than privacy. If they manually search my luggage, that's a huge inconvenience. But guess what, there's nothing in there that can get me in any type of trouble. In fact, whenever I'm packing my carry on, I make sure to throw in anything embarrassing I can think of to make it awkward. Why pack a a few condoms when you can pack a few boxes? etc.

Chillax.....

Even if we don't account for privacy and human rights. How about getting cancer

In order to generate the nude image of the human body, these machines emit terahertz photons -- high-frequency energy "particles" that can pass through clothing and body tissue.

The manufacturers of such machines claim they are perfectly safe and present no health risks, but a study conducted by Boian S. Alexandrov (and colleagues) at the Center for Nonlinear Studies at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico showed that these terahertz waves could "...unzip double-stranded DNA, creating bubbles in the double strand that could significantly interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication."

Full-body scanners used on air passengers may damage human DNA

This is soft kill.

turbolapp · 02-04-2010, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by emp

You are trading your privacy for scare tactics that your politicians hope will get them reelected, not security.

::emp::

Went ahead and fixed that.

m0rtal · 02-04-2010, 06:06 PM

I would sport a fleshlight on my manhood and then wear a t-shirt with my aff url during the press frenzy. "Man Wearing Flashlight on his Private Parts Refused Entry. Read His Story Here." "Sex Toy Mistaken for Bomb, Man Refused Entry."

Seriously though that's retarded - at least in Canada (they're in the process of bringing them in) you will be able to refuse and opt in for a pat down instead.

Fatbat · 02-04-2010, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeoReborn

Well in a news article, they are saying that the 'flaw' in the scanner is that it cannot see inside a man or woman and that recently there is intelligence that terrorists are looking to insert bombs inside their bodies!

problem creation -> reaction -> solution!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trademark

Dang. I was just about to suggest that if I were running a training cell in the Pashtun, I'd be telling my recruits to bend over. For the equipment. For the bomb stuff.

It's already been done. Don't you guys read the news? Saudi terrorist stuck a bomb up his ass that was cell phone detonated as he tried to "ass"assinate the Saudi deputy "interior" minister (oh the sweet irony).

BBC News - Fears over 'internal' terror bomb

http://armiesofliberation.com/archiv...ll-from-yemen/

Internal Bomb – Suicide Bomber Hid Explosives Inside His Body : Homeland Security News

Saudi suicide bomber hid IED in his anal cavity | Homeland Security News Wire

I'm actually kind of surprised planes aren't falling out of the skies.

SkyFire · 02-04-2010, 06:46 PM

1) The entire idea of 'enhanced security' for flights is illogical at best, a cover for liberty reduction and increased acceptance of the police state at worst.

2) Stupidity of airport security measures aside, I have kids, and these don't bother me for my use or theirs. If we're going to be forced to suffer through such a charade (meaning security run by people who make less than Burger Flippers), I say bring it on. Speed it up thank you very much.

turbolapp · 02-16-2010, 02:31 PM

Ok so here's the win/win solution according to my mom (first time we've agreed in long time too

):

Have a booth that you can step into
that will not X-ray you, but will detonate any explosive device
you may have on you.

blueRAP · 02-16-2010, 02:37 PM

is she farting?

FortressDewey · 02-16-2010, 02:41 PM

LOL irl..."is she farting"

Roddy · 02-16-2010, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbolapp

Ok so here's the win/win solution according to my mom (first time we've agreed in long time too

):

Have a booth that you can step into
that will not X-ray you, but will detonate any explosive device
you may have on you.

I like it! If you've nothing to hide you wouldn't object to it. On the plane you go.

If you do object to it. You have to undergo a very long and through cavity search. Could result in you missing your flight.

If you do have something to hide, and you're dumb enough to step in to the thing then let the punishment fit the crime. You get blown up.

The simple ideas are always the best!

roclafamilia · 02-16-2010, 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbolapp

Ok so here's the win/win solution according to my mom (first time we've agreed in long time too

):

Have a booth that you can step into
that will not X-ray you, but will detonate any explosive device
you may have on you.

what about the unknown explosive devices? at least now they see something suspicious they investigate.

I was "randomly" chosen about four years ago when i was getting on a plane to mexico...there was a few little stars next to my name on my ticket, that no one else in my family had...it was very obvious that something was special about mine, because everytime i went through a checkpoint, from the moment i was handed my ticket, til i cleared security, people were always singling be out when they were handling the tickets...so if i was not an idiot and i had something on me that i shouldn't have, i could have placed it in my brothers bag, or just swapped bags...it's not exactly a "random" check, but it's probably randomized through the computer...so i guess that's actually "more" random?

evelynds · 02-16-2010, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by subigo

Fuck airports. If a train doesn't go there, neither do I.

Quoteworthy.

bcc423 · 02-16-2010, 04:31 PM

I wonder how long it will take before a market for scanner porn/nudity fetish is established.

redwings0921 · 02-16-2010, 04:34 PM

So what if some dude I can't see and will never see again gets a view of my schlong. People are too timid and nervous about shit like this. I may feel a little intimidated about him seeing my tits though

fixie · 02-16-2010, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbolapp

Ok so here's the win/win solution according to my mom (first time we've agreed in long time too

):

Have a booth that you can step into
that will not X-ray you, but will detonate any explosive device
you may have on you.

So, if I want to kill you (I like you very much, darling, I'm just making an example), all I have to do is place some explosive in your clothes without you knowing and let the airport security do the rest

?

loopline · 02-16-2010, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fixie

So, if I want to kill you (I like you very much, darling, I'm just making an example), all I have to do is place some explosive in your clothes without you knowing and let the airport security do the rest

?

LOL well, perhaps thats not the best solution.

I would to thru it though, I have nothing to hide. And I would gladly submit to an xray that may be less then desirable, if it meant it would drastically reduce the chance that someone else on the plane is going to blow me up. I mean, when it comes to life or death I would do a lot of things.

Trademark · 02-16-2010, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwings0921

So what if some dude I can't see and will never see again gets a view of my schlong. People are too timid and nervous about shit like this.

This logic is baffling to me (no offense to you personally, redwings0921). Like you, I have heard the person watching the images is far-removed from the person being imaged. But nothing gives me confidence what I've heard is true. Here is a good example (posted by someone else in another thread)...

Exposed: Naked Body Scanner Images Of Film Star Printed, Circulated By Airport Staff

Or, if you prefer...

Shah Rukh signs off sexy body-scan printouts at Heathrow - Yahoo! India News

If we can agree to set aside the man's response to the offense as irrelevant to the issue, we have a clear case of lying.

I am always floored by how quickly we trust what we hear or read. That goes for politicians, state officials (e.g. TSA, CIA, DoD, CDC, etc.), spouses, and business partners.

As for the promises of privacy with the BSI's...

Trademark · 02-16-2010, 06:16 PM

As an addendum to my comment about the TSA employees possessing less-than-stellar decision-making skills...

Cafferty File: Tell Jack how you really feel Blog Archive - TSA makes a 4-yr.-old disabled boy remove leg braces - Blogs from CNN.com

Daniel Rubin: Another case of TSA overkill | Philadelphia Inquirer | 02/15/2010

(sigh)

redwings0921 · 02-16-2010, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trademark

This logic is baffling to me (no offense to you personally, redwings0921). Like you, I have heard the person watching the images is far-removed from the person being imaged. But nothing gives me confidence what I've heard is true. Here is a good example (posted by someone else in another thread)...

Exposed: Naked Body Scanner Images Of Film Star Printed, Circulated By Airport Staff

Or, if you prefer...

Shah Rukh signs off sexy body-scan printouts at Heathrow - Yahoo! India News

If we can agree to set aside the man's response to the offense as irrelevant to the issue, we have a clear case of lying.

I am always floored by how quickly we trust what we hear or read. That goes for politicians, state officials (e.g. TSA, CIA, DoD, CDC, etc.), spouses, and business partners.

As for the promises of privacy with the BSI's...

Even then, pass it around. I am sitll some random ass dude with a 16 incher

02-03-2010, 06:12 PM	#1 (permalink)
Trademark Need Articles? PM me! Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 615 iTrader: 57 / 100%	Airport Body Scanners Revisited: Would You Comply? Interesting development (to me, at least). Heathrow and Manchester have launched their body scanners... Full body scanners introduced at Heathrow and Manchester airports as Lord Adonis seeks to allay privacy fears \| Mail Online That's not the interesting part, of course. The first part that got my attention is the repeal of the "don't scan the youngsters" rule. Wonder where that decision will go when future generations of the BSIs are launched. The second part was that those who refuse to comply are being banned from flights. There's no... "dude, just pat me down really, really good and jam the wand in the corners" option. No full scan, no plane ride (if you're chosen). For those of you who are against this sort of thing, would you comply to catch your flight? If your 13-year-old daughter is chosen, would that make you less open to the idea? Keep in mind the folks choosing people for scanning aren't crack CIA agents with decades of experience in behavioral tendencies. This guy may actually be such an agent, but I'm guessing no... So... would you comply? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________ Article Rates For WickedFire Members! Click here to read what your fellow WickedFire Members have said about my article-writing service.

02-03-2010, 07:09 PM	#4 (permalink)
ricdes LIBTARD Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Zurich-London-NY Posts: 1,689 iTrader: 4 / 100%	airport security in Gatwick was hilarious this january. They had another security set up before boarding the plane. Fucking long lines and delays bc 51% of people had to get their hand lugagge manually checked. This doesn't make any sense. About those scanners.. well i personally dont give a shit if they need me to do that before boarding. BUT I'd not board the plane if they'd want to check my little sister in that crap and rather make a huge case about it in the press. People need to man up and realize that we cannot live in a 100% secure society without giving up our privacy. I rather have a 0.01% risk of being blown up on a plane, train, wherever than just having my whole life protocolized (fucking UK). I'm sick of seeing constitutions being crippled because some dude tried to blow up some plane. In the 70's we would've rioted if some crappy politician would've wanted to do 5% of what they have implemented now. We're giving up way too many rights so that politicians can say that they at least did something against it when the next plane blows up. Lets just be honest here: If someone wants to blow up a plane and if he's a smart dude, he'll ALWAYS find a way to do it. 1984 // rant end Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________ Twitter them ricdes's

02-03-2010, 07:29 PM	#6 (permalink)
Falian Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 1,129 iTrader: 8 / 100%	In next years news: Terrorists have now resorted to shooting heat-guided missiles at commercial airplanes. In order to combat this, the TSA is requiring all airplanes to be escorted by two military jets. This is expected to increase ticket costs by about 200%. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________ Watch my webinar: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxISw...&feature=g-upl

02-03-2010, 07:38 PM	#7 (permalink)
jryan21 WF Premium Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 3,132 iTrader: 0 / 0%	Wait about 10 years and it will be revealed that the real purpose of the scanners was not to search for explosives or weapons, but to selectively sterilize part of the population. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

02-03-2010, 07:42 PM	#8 (permalink)
SeoReborn Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: London UK Posts: 1,492 iTrader: 43 / 100%	Well in a news article, they are saying that the 'flaw' in the scanner is that it cannot see inside a man or woman and that recently there is intelligence that terrorists are looking to insert bombs inside their bodies! problem creation -> reaction -> solution! Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________ 80% of our income comes from 20% of our efforts. Work smarter, work less, enjoy life! “An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody will see it” ~ Mahatma Gandhi "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." ~ Albert Einstein You're living in a matrix, wake up: War On Your Mind \| Support Ron Paul \| Its All An Illusion Fiat currency is going down the drain. I sell my cash for gold and silver

02-03-2010, 09:20 PM	#11 (permalink)
Nostalgae Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 221 iTrader: 0 / 0%	Why are these scanners a problem for anyone in general and why is it a special problem for kids? The image is not erotic or pornographic in my opinion.. (?) Also how are people supposed to bring marijuana along now? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

02-03-2010, 10:51 PM	#12 (permalink)
subigo Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: TACOS $1.00! Posts: 3,890 iTrader: 15 / 100%	Fuck airports. If a train doesn't go there, neither do I. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________ ZenSix Hosting - Sold Out. Get on the waiting list.

02-03-2010, 10:59 PM	#13 (permalink)
supersundas Affiliate Markedurrr Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: On the interwebz Posts: 158 iTrader: 0 / 0%	I think Mr. Pedobear will find himself working at the airport now Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

02-04-2010, 04:23 AM	#16 (permalink)
emthree Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 61 iTrader: 0 / 0%	I'm a former DHS employee and I just want to say that if a person is chosen for additional screening from one of these machines it's with due cause. These machines are already serving their purpose by scaring the flying public and raising paranoia. Chances are if you think you're going to be scanned ahead of time, you wont be walking with anything artfully concealed. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

02-04-2010, 04:27 AM	#17 (permalink)
amanda11 Hustle hard Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 2,445 iTrader: 0 / 0%	1. My balls are going to get sterilized from those machines 2. The old trick of sticking a bag of weed up your asshole in the airport doesn't work anymore 3. Fuck planes, I'll take a cruise ship. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

02-04-2010, 05:49 AM	#19 (permalink)
PowPow Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: England Posts: 140 iTrader: 0 / 0%	This doesn't bother me I hate flying, fuck if I'm getting on a plane. Don't xrays make you serial? I thought that was why when you get xrayed in hospitals they get you to cover your balls. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

02-04-2010, 08:07 AM	#20 (permalink)
emp Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 5,977 iTrader: 17 / 100%	They just had an expert on a TV show here in Germany. He was able to smuggle all parts needed to bring a plane down without the scanner even showing it. Thing is, these scanners detect differences in heat given off from your body. That is why items will show up (normally their edges), because they have a different heat diffusion from the rest of your skin. Doesn't work with anything you got in a cavity (so yeah, you can still bend over for that marihuana smuggling), and it didn't even work with items in a loose fitting pocket. I guess plastic explosive rolled out very fine and sewn into loose fitting clothes won't show up either. You are trading your privacy for lies and bullshit, not security. ::emp:: Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________ Your Logical Fallacies - know them to avoid them That's because all programmers are also ninjas.(but not all ninjas are programmers) - LogicFlux Blind Ape Seo

02-04-2010, 08:54 AM	#21 (permalink)
rogerrabbit Generic Black Guy Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 820 iTrader: 3 / 100%	I personally have no objection to being 'scanned.' I really have nothing to hide so if some remote person sees what I look like under my clothing, why do I care? Privacy, blah, blah, blah. If it's preventing someone from blowing up my flight, why not? I think I just value security a hell of a lot more than privacy. If they manually search my luggage, that's a huge inconvenience. But guess what, there's nothing in there that can get me in any type of trouble. In fact, whenever I'm packing my carry on, I make sure to throw in anything embarrassing I can think of to make it awkward. Why pack a a few condoms when you can pack a few boxes? etc. Chillax..... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________ It seems I've become a priest.

02-04-2010, 12:59 PM	#23 (permalink)
kingfish Champion of Awesome Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 3,501 iTrader: 9 / 100%	Sure thing they can see my naughty bits if they want wtf do I care. Probably they don't want to see them anyway though One day we're all going to have to fly naked after after a long wait while we ingest lots of laxatives. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________

02-04-2010, 02:12 PM	#24 (permalink)
Trademark Need Articles? PM me! Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 615 iTrader: 57 / 100%	As if on cue... Bosom bombers: Women have explosive breast implants I realize WND posts some crazy stuff. So, the above story may be fabricated or misguided. But, you have to admit... it's not that hard to believe. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________ Article Rates For WickedFire Members! Click here** to read what your fellow WickedFire Members have said about my article-writing service.

02-04-2010, 02:47 PM	#25 (permalink)
Benji49 Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 827 iTrader: 6 / 100%	One of the reasons I went into internet marketing was to avoid plane travel. I flew a lot on business in the early 2000s around the time of 9/11. It sucked back then. I can't imagine what's like now. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

02-04-2010, 06:06 PM	#28 (permalink)
m0rtal King of the Jungle Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Toronto Posts: 2,499 iTrader: 40 / 100%	I would sport a fleshlight on my manhood and then wear a t-shirt with my aff url during the press frenzy. "Man Wearing Flashlight on his Private Parts Refused Entry. Read His Story Here." "Sex Toy Mistaken for Bomb, Man Refused Entry." Seriously though that's retarded - at least in Canada (they're in the process of bringing them in) you will be able to refuse and opt in for a pat down instead. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________ Get an Orcasm -> High PR & High DA / PA Blog Posts

02-04-2010, 06:46 PM	#30 (permalink)
SkyFire Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 476 iTrader: 5 / 100%	1) The entire idea of 'enhanced security' for flights is illogical at best, a cover for liberty reduction and increased acceptance of the police state at worst. 2) Stupidity of airport security measures aside, I have kids, and these don't bother me for my use or theirs. If we're going to be forced to suffer through such a charade (meaning security run by people who make less than Burger Flippers), I say bring it on. Speed it up thank you very much. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

02-16-2010, 02:31 PM	#31 (permalink)
turbolapp Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Houston, TexASS Posts: 8,335 iTrader: 7 / 100%	Ok so here's the win/win solution according to my mom (first time we've agreed in long time too ): Have a booth that you can step into that will not X-ray you, but will detonate any explosive device you may have on you. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________ Workflowy Best Free Organizational App. Period.

02-16-2010, 02:37 PM	#32 (permalink)
blueRAP On the come up Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Oklahoma City Posts: 795 iTrader: 1 / 100%	is she farting? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

02-16-2010, 02:41 PM	#33 (permalink)
FortressDewey Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Virginia Posts: 257 iTrader: 0 / 0%	LOL irl..."is she farting" Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________

02-16-2010, 04:31 PM	#37 (permalink)
bcc423 все мудаки Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 667 iTrader: 10 / 100%	I wonder how long it will take before a market for scanner porn/nudity fetish is established. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________

02-16-2010, 04:34 PM	#38 (permalink)
redwings0921 Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 694 iTrader: 1 / 100%	So what if some dude I can't see and will never see again gets a view of my schlong. People are too timid and nervous about shit like this. I may feel a little intimidated about him seeing my tits though Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter

02-16-2010, 06:16 PM	#42 (permalink)
Trademark Need Articles? PM me! Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 615 iTrader: 57 / 100%	As an addendum to my comment about the TSA employees possessing less-than-stellar decision-making skills... Cafferty File: Tell Jack how you really feel Blog Archive - TSA makes a 4-yr.-old disabled boy remove leg braces - Blogs from CNN.com Daniel Rubin: Another case of TSA overkill \| Philadelphia Inquirer \| 02/15/2010 (sigh) Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter __________________ Article Rates For WickedFire Members! Click here to read what your fellow WickedFire Members have said about my article-writing service.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
TSA Body Scanners	ck256	Shooting The Shit	17	01-15-2010 01:29 AM
Full body scanners may break child pornography laws	Lpdesigner	Shooting The Shit	42	01-06-2010 08:29 PM