|
|||||||
| Shooting The Shit Anything goes, seriously. Come meet and network with your peers, it's a fun way to take a break out of your busy day of posting at other boring forums. |
|
Welcome to the WickedFire - Affiliate Marketing Forum - Internet Marketing Webmaster SEO Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||
![]() |
haha thats halarious,
But if your looking for an answer I've always been a scientist.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
How is it 2007 and people still believe in "gods"?
__________________
Dallas Web Hosting |
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||
![]() |
I'm going to be labeled as a geek for even saying this but its just something I think.
The writers of Stargate SG1 the television series that has been around for the past 10 years, featured from the original stargate movie, their story line is by far the most interesting and most compelling story of what "Could" have happened way back thousands of years ago. I'm not saying its what happened because oviously it was hollywooded up to make it more compelling but the way they incorporate real world facts of ancient mythology and ancient egyptian gods is something that truly makes me step back and think "Fuck, I wonder what it was really like way back when the so called Gods ran things". It would be interesting to see and compelling to think about.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |||
![]() |
Quote:
But don't worry, they will all fail in the long run while we are keeping our stable income and increasing the income every month or two for many years to come. The only downfall is that they might make our customers a little less trustworthy when it comes to buying our products but the upside to this is we can show them one of the smallest things with the smallest results and gain their trust for life because that one little small thing we give them for free is what they have been trying to buy from the members at warrior forums for many years with no results.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||
![]() |
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Try living in the Bible Belt. ![]() A local baptist church had a 'study program' for a month that was entitled 'science versus creationism.....a scientific look at the bible'. I'm sure the info there was some nobel prize winning material. I was at the coaches meeting for my son's baseball league. I got to hear a group of coaches talk about this *study* with such gems as 'I want to go there and get my kids involved. These public schools are filling their minds with garbage.' The people have had this stuff pounded into their head since birth, and they just can't fathom any other beliefs. I have very few confrontations over this subject matter because I avoid them. However, one time I got into a discussion with a group of people about a local gentleman who was convicted of some pretty bad behavior and serving jail time. Personally, i've never had more than a speeding ticket, and these people knew that. Their conclusion was that, in the end, he was a better person than me because he was 'saved' and i wasn't. |
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
![]() |
Haha. I feel your pain. Oh, trust me, I know what living in the bible belt is all about.
__________________
"Never confuse movement with action." ~Ernest Hemingway "While you have lost some money, you have also gained some knowledge. So in the end you may have not lossed at all. Good luck bro." ~ Sumitdhawan09 |
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
-LV|DET|LA-
|
Quote:
Hall of Records (no thats not my site, i just figured to past the link and not the article, that site has not been updated in 8 years it looks like, still interesting) |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |||
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
![]() |
Interesting point, but I don't think you'd be able to elaborate.
__________________
"...and at a miracle! by simple operations began a little to earn..." |
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Hail to the King, Baby!
|
Take String Theory. Scientists around the world hailed it as the theory to understand the universe. Then all of a sudden, you need all these extra dimensions to make the theory work and they were added. Then you had more dimensions pop up. In the end you had the theory working with many different dimensions that even the scientists who championed it could not say with a straight face that it was the understanding of the universe as they had originally claimed.
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
The Post Whore
|
God exsists.
Jesus is the son of God. The earth is ~10,000 years old. Humans lived with dinosaurs I'm not joking, go talk to a creationist (or read online) if you want to know more. Carbon dateing is incredibly inaccurate a live penguin was dated to be 8,000 years old and the same rock was dated to be between ~100,000 years old and ~2 billon years old by four different carbon dateing techniques believed to be accurate The Great Flood did stuff... There is evidence to support that the Grand Canon was caused by ONE cataclysmic event. The Theory Evolution is total crap It doesn't work, things don't become new species. All the theory does is use an incomprehendable amount of time and chance (the actually probabilty of evolution is impossible) amount of time to say things happened. Go read more online. I just wrote this really quick (I'm at school) - maybe this weekend I will go more indepth and explain some of those things... |
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
![]() |
Other than the misspelling, this is absolutely true. Well, I can't vouch for the examples because it's the first I have heard of them, but there has been numerous times that carbon dating has been proven to be about as accurate as drunkenly throwing a dart at a wall.
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
Turbocharged, Bitch
|
Before I begin I want you to know that I'm not insulting you, I'm simply dissecting your statement.
Firstly, God Exists. What evidense is there to support this? I have seen no physical or even spirtual construction of God. We can say that his existence is possible, but certainly not definate. Second, Jesus is the son of God. That may very well be true but we still do not have any factual proof that validates the existence of God. Because of that fact we have no choice but to say "If God does indeed exist, the Jesus is his son." The earth is less than 10,000 years old. How can you know this? Religion has no evidense other than a book to susbstaniate this claim. The Bible cannot be considered an authority simply because it's bias is obviously very one sided. Until there can be undeniable proof of the age of the earth this fact will also have to remain possible, but certainly not definate. Third, humans lived with the dinosaurs. Again, what proof does anyone have to substaniate this? Reading the views of a creationist cannot be considered proof simply because of their obvious bias. Though some of their opinions may be factual, the fact remains that their opinions must be twisted to their cause because of their bias. Fourth, Carbon dating is incredibly inaccurate. This may very well be true. However, there is more effort on the science side of things because at least they're trying to find a way to make it accurate as opposed to relying on a book. Fifth, The Great Flood did stuff. What constitutes a great flood? The mass melting of the glaciers could certainly be considered a great flood. However, what proof can a creationist provide that validates the claims that "God" created a massive flood. Lastly, The Theory of Evolution is total crap. Really? How can you prove any of your claims on this one? What makes the probability of evolution impossible? Back 5,000 years ago do you think someone who was chronically fat or blind survived? Yet today, in our modern age, nearly 10% of the population is severely obese and blind people still live. You don't think that animals/people havn't evolved to survive in their environments? Explain the fish that exist deep in the ocean that have no eyes because the light doesn't penetrate that far. What about thick haired animals that survive in cold climates? No... that's not evolution. God put them all there. Okay, so what about the thousands of different dog breeds that have sprung up in the last few hundred years? No, you're right, God made the Cokapoo. In either case- please provide evidense to support your claims. Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Quote:
I even gave up arguing with them Jesus people. Let them be. ::emp::
__________________
Get your own Bot army! Use promo code blindape199 That's because all programmers are also ninjas.(but not all ninjas are programmers) - LogicFlux Blind Ape Seo |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) | |
|
Call me Andy
|
Quote:
I'm Catholic, and don't buy the majority of the scientific theories because there is not one that makes enough sense to completely make me believe any of them. But then again, I might have a little bias, I went to a Baptist elementary school and they pounded our little brains with enough bible to kill a person. They showed us a video of how the flood caused the continents to split up and stuff.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | ||||||
|
Will work for cheese
|
RomeStar, somebody's been feeding you a truckload of bullshit. Those are all standard creationist jokes, and each one is easily disproved in hundreds of ways, if not tens of thousands of ways. Thank goodness I don't have to list them all... since creationists have been trotting out the same old nonsense for so long, somebody put together a nice database of explanations why each claim is wrong.
Quote:
Age of the Universe Quote:
However, the basic reason this claim is full of shit is that carbon dating isn't used on things between 100,000 and 2 billion years old. Carbon dating works on most things up to about 50,000 years back, and beyond that a host of different methods are used. Link: Carbon dating is fine. Quote:
Link: Great flood / Grand Canyon bullshit Quote:
It's hard to know where to begin with somebody who doesn't believe evolution, because that mindset is so far detached from reality. Not one single person looks at the evidence with an open mind and rejects evolution; instead, people are brainwashed against it by their pastors and then look at evolution with a "where can I convince myself this is wrong" mindset. Usually it's pretty easy -- you run up against something you don't understand and say, "aha! I don't understand that, therefore it must be wrong." Something needs to get you out of that mindset, and reason and evidence won't do it. Maybe a whack on the head with a big stick would work. I really don't know what will work, but try this: read a few actual science books about evolution. Every time something doesn't make sense to you, it's probably something other creationists have used to oppose evolution, which means you could find it in the Index of Creationists Claims. Use that site as a sort of FAQ to give the basics of things you don't understand. Half of the site involves refuting anti-evolution silliness, but you might need to start with these parts:
Quote:
Besides, punishment has no bearing on what's real or not. If you rationalize you belief on God that way, odds are you realize it's a stupid idea but you're going through the motions so you don't get in trouble. What's the point? Furthermore, what if you've picked the wrong God? Is it really worth believing in one to avoid punishment when it could just as easily be Allah or Zeus or Vishnu waiting to strike you down instead of the Christian God? Or, what if you just believe in a general overall God, but it turns out there's really a sectarian God who sends everyone but Mormons to Hell anyway? You must be scared shitless of all these possibilities unless you're willing to call them all out as bullshit, which is a much better idea. Quote:
reasoning underlies a lot of the basic scientific theories that creationists deny. I grew up loving science and was still completely blown away by just how deep the field of physics is when I had majored in it at a top university for a few years. I ended up switching to bio and was again shocked by just how much evidence there is for evolution.. There are a few reasons scientists have a credibility problem in the public eye, none of which are valid reasons to reject science:
__________________
Setec "No matter what unconscionable thing I do to them, they just thank Me for not doing something even worse." -God Duhhhhhrrrr Buy My Stupid eBook! <--as seen in Jon's sig! "Honesty is the best policy - when there is money in it." -Mark Twain |
||||||
|
|
|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
The Post Whore
|
Setec, public schools have been feeding you a truckload of bullshit. The Theory of Evolution is only taught because it is the only theory about the origin of life that is not based on a religion (however, evolution is still a faith that you are worthless and you came about by chance to reproduce your species).
First, about my spelling in my initial post (since your the second to comment), if you actually comprehended it you would know that I "wrote this really quick" and didn't have time to check my spelling. I would like to point out that I have studied creationism and evolution. (I went to a Christian school for two years) Setec, I highly doubt you have honestly studied creationism. I only brought up carbon dating because a lot of people's first response when I tell them the age of the Earth is what about carbon dating? My point is that it is not reliable. There are varies factors that could make it inaccurate; for example carbon dating assumes that the rate of carbon decay has remained the same over the thousands of years the creature has been dead. Just throwing this out there, but don't ice ages occur roughly every 10,000 years supposedly? So if we have a 50,000 year old creature that goes through five ice ages and freezes. This would cause the decay to be much slower. Of course that particular example doesn't support me, but it just shows an example of how carbon dating could be way off. When I said evolution does work. I wasn't just saying it... "Evolution is mathematically impossible. The mathematical probability of a SINGLE CELL coming about by chance is 1/10340,000,000, the fraction 1 divided by 1 followed by 340 million zeros! And then this cell must live long enough to reproduce. And then the reproduced cell must live long enough to do the same. And then more "accidents" must happen to cause more complexity. And then more "accidents" must happen to cause more complexity. And long before the first "accident" evolution is nothing but a silly, mystical fairy tale." Finally, I would like to point out that there is no such thing as a vestigial organ (an organ that is useless - like a leftover byproduct of evolution). It is a common misconception that the appendix is useless, go read this: Cutting out a useless vestigial argument |
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
![]() |
Actually you are all wrong, its common knowledge that the Earth was created by reptilians.
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
I love you wacko guys, you make life interesting. 200 years ago you would be telling us that the world is flat (100% of scientists would disagree, but what do they know).
The interesting question you should ask yourself is: Why do all smart people in the world disagree with me? |
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
![]() |
Setec, I said I wouldn't argue with them Jesus people, but my fingers itch...
I think the thing that riles most religionists is that science is not a faith. Science is a method. It's a process. It is based on finding faults in one another's works to build on them. So if you disprove, really disprove evolution tomorrow, science is just gonna truck along another path. As scientists, we're not gonna stand still and defend a lost position. Funny thing is that creationists want to debunk evolution by the claim that "you can't observe it" - yes you can. Bacteria (unsure of spelling, but hey, English is not my first langage) and Virii evolve every day right in front of our eyes. In fact, science has to keep up with that evolution to provide all the jesus hugging creationists with antibiotics and up to date medicine. If you really do not believe in evolution, pray instead of taking those miracles of science next time you are sick. ![]() ::emp::
__________________
Get your own Bot army! Use promo code blindape199 That's because all programmers are also ninjas.(but not all ninjas are programmers) - LogicFlux Blind Ape Seo |
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
The Post Whore
|
Quote:
when has something turned into a new species? never. science itself may not be a faith, but the Theory of Evolution is. You believe that there is no God and that you are absolutely worthless, you came around by chance and that you can do whatever you want in your materialistic lives and when you die you just cease to live (when you actually go to Hell on Judgement Day) |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
cpaburnout 4 lyfe
|
Quote:
If that's the case, the creation of a new species (ie dinosaurs, humankind) would have to serve a greater purpose than to simply maintain the balance of all life. Now, we come to a realm that is beyond human comprehension. This is my own personal opinion or reality tunnel and I can't prove shit. I like to look at the spritual underpinnings because I think like a mystic. I like reading scientific opinions, however, while scientists are always asking "how?", I'm always asking "why?"
__________________
“Eighty percent of success is showing up.” - Woody Allen |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | |||||
|
Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Please red about: Radiocarbon dating - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia And as you said that you've studied so much , you probably knew that carbon dating is NOT used for dating the age of earth. See: Radiometric dating - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia for further details. Quote:
Your understanding of evolution is that a cell must be formed at once "by accident" which is utterly wrong. First , the basic building block of life form (nucleotides), then amino acids,they then form some other structures which names I've forgotten ,which then form self-replicating structures such as DNA or RNA.It's a step by step process , and there is no change that a cell just forms in a second by chance from water , methane , heat and whatever else is needed. The whole point is that each step leads to an increase in complexity,and the sum of all parts can be greater than the parts taken separately. Quote:
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Quote:
For me, I know that modern science has saved my life several times already. Yes, we came around by chance, but no, we and I are not worthless. Having no faith in God does not imply worthlessness. How Christians make that leap is completely beyond me. The other leap you are making here is no belief in God = purely materialistic world view = unethical behaviour. There can be ethics and moral without a God in the picture. For example, I can decide to behave morally because I decide it is the better thing to do. For example, I won't go around killing people. Not because I believe in any God or /and his/her/its commandments, but rather because I like people to be alive and well. Maybe also because "Do unto others as you want to be done unto" is a kinda neat concept...which also works without a God. You know, I don't need an imaginary friend. ::emp::
__________________
Get your own Bot army! Use promo code blindape199 That's because all programmers are also ninjas.(but not all ninjas are programmers) - LogicFlux Blind Ape Seo |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) |
|
The Post Whore
|
Yes, without God you are worthless. Your only here to reproduce your species. You should know that, you seem to like science.
Christians don't just blindly believe in God. Religion is personal. Not to be confused with the liberal perversion meaning keep it yourself, but you have a person relationship with God. Also, George Washington said this: "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports." |
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) | |
![]() |
Quote:
While we are at it, I am trying to better my community, live ethically (standards not set by God, but by society and my own thinking foremost) and better the lives of people around me. I will have kids and raise them to be good people, without religion. This is the point where I will point you back at the pic at the beginning of the thread and stop discussing this, because we have reached a barrier in your head. It's called christianity. ::emp::
__________________
Get your own Bot army! Use promo code blindape199 That's because all programmers are also ninjas.(but not all ninjas are programmers) - LogicFlux Blind Ape Seo |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) |
![]() |
Ignorant of what? Of your god? of your faith?
I live in a Xtian country, so how could I be? I had religion in school and was a (non-baptized..LOL) member of the catholic boyscouts, so I know a lot about christian beliefs and their faith. So... tell me, Roman... did baby jesus tell you to distribute trojans with your screensavers? ![]() ::emp::
__________________
Get your own Bot army! Use promo code blindape199 That's because all programmers are also ninjas.(but not all ninjas are programmers) - LogicFlux Blind Ape Seo |
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) | |
|
The Post Whore
|
Quote:
Please don't make fun of Jesus/God - he might not mean a lot to you but he means a lot to a lot of people. So what if I distribute adware through screen savers? It's not illegal, or really not all that unethical. Come on, you have BlueHatSEO on your blogroll. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) | |
|
Hail to the King, Baby!
|
Quote:
This thread is becoming so DP it is is sad. On DP they being up stuff like this all the time becuase they know it inflames viewpoints and the original author also knows that with more views and arguments in ther thread, they will get a few cents with the DP Adsense sharing thing. There is stuff here that offends me and to be honest I do not think there is enough "experts" on either side to make it a worthwhile discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) | |
|
The Post Whore
|
Quote:
I agree again, we should end this with some punch and pie. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 (permalink) |
![]() |
Yeah, lets end this.
::emp::
__________________
Get your own Bot army! Use promo code blindape199 That's because all programmers are also ninjas.(but not all ninjas are programmers) - LogicFlux Blind Ape Seo |
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) | |||||||||
|
Will work for cheese
|
Quote:
And I'm not "being fed a truckload of bullshit by public schools." I did my undergrad at an Ivy League college (oh shit, East Coast Liberal Alert!!!! RUN!) and my graduate research uses evolution constantly. So my qualifications are a little better than "bullshit public school." And they're a lot better than Christian schools, Islamic Madrassas, etc. You creationists just don't realize what a huge joke you are to anybody who knows anything about life science. That's why we mostly just make fun of you rather than engage your arguments -- it's impossible to take you seriously. The information to prove you're wrong is everywhere, and if you can't take 15 seconds on Google to find it then you're pretty much hopeless. Fairly "debating" you isn't really worthwhile since you wouldn't recognize evidence if it hit you over the head with a bowling ball. I found a good IRC quote off Digg today that kind of conveys this point: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And that brings up another good point: fucking tree rings prove the Universe is older than you think it is. You don't need radioactive isotopes, just an ax. When your world view can be disproved with a tool you can fashion out of flint, you need to rethink it. Quote:
First, cells are advanced, especially eukaryotic cells. The first life was probably a self-replicating molecule, a precursor of DNA, devoid of all the other fancy trappings of a cell. And given that the proper ingredients were stewing in a soup of organic goo across much of the Earth for hundreds of millions of years, that's not improbable at all. Evolution is really the opposite of an accidental process. That's what people don't get. All forms of life involve errors in their replication, which result in some degree of random variation in future generations. Natural selection is the highly non-random process which funnels those variations in the most beneficial directions, resulting in surprisingly predictable long-term changes of organisms in response to their environments. Try learning something about it before you run around telling people it's wrong. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Atheists are one of the most moral groups in America, responsible for far less crime per person than Christians or other religious types. We believe that there's only one life so we shouldn't fuck it up, and that under no circumstances will we be rewarded with a room full of virgins if we fly a jet into a skyscraper. Furthermore, I don't need a giant imaginary father figure in the sky to give meaning to my life -- I can decide on my own meaning. And I'm certainly not worthless to myself or to thousands of other people who benefit from various things I do. You've been brainwashed by KKK types to think that atheists lead materialistic, immoral, meaningless lives. You're not alone; we atheists are pretty much the only group about which a majority of Americans still agree with the Klan. I am encouraged by the number of atheists speaking up here, and in other places on the Internet. I guess places like WF are usually tilted toward a smarter than average segment of the population, and therefore more atheists, but I think the anonymity of the Internet is part of it, too. There are probably a lot more atheists willing to speak their minds behind the anonymity of the net than in public or phone surveys... so the percentage of fully sane people in the country might be higher than the estimated 10-15%.
__________________
Setec "No matter what unconscionable thing I do to them, they just thank Me for not doing something even worse." -God Duhhhhhrrrr Buy My Stupid eBook! <--as seen in Jon's sig! "Honesty is the best policy - when there is money in it." -Mark Twain |
|||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.wickedfire.com/shooting-shit/8995-science-vs-faith-pic.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| eComXpo’s Disgraceful Advertising - AffiliateManager.net Forums | This thread | Refback | 03-19-2007 09:31 AM | |
| Cost Per News / Affiliate Marketing on the Bleeding Edge | This thread | Refback | 03-19-2007 12:42 AM | |
| The Gospel of Affiliate Marketing | This thread | Refback | 03-18-2007 11:14 PM | |
| Cost Per News / eComXpo’s Disgraceful Advertising | This thread | Pingback | 03-18-2007 10:59 PM | |
| The Gospel of Affiliate Marketing at Affiliate Tip Blog by Shawn Collins | This thread | Pingback | 03-18-2007 06:17 PM | |
| Untitled document | This thread | Refback | 03-17-2007 02:32 PM | |