Link Explosion SUPER-NET: Diversified, Simplified, Rankified - POWERFUL RESULTS
- Thread starter lizardtime
- Start date
- Status
REVIEW:
This Shit is for real. Totally impressed by it.
Communication: Awesome. Told me when it would be done and stuck to it.
Turn around time: 24 hours. (I was first though)
Quality: Bangin! This intricate process really is impressive. I had about 90% of the properties stick (moderation is to be expected). The web 2.0 profiles was a little lower.
Lizardtime over delivered on it though so it all worked out with extra.
Properties: The properties all looked pretty good for what I like. I prefer an extra spun version as compared to readable. This was somewhere in the middle. You could pick out that it is software if you paid attention. I have no problem with this.
The only thing I don't like is that all of my links are at the bottom of the article/site instead of in context. This can not be changed with software such as this I know, just a preference.
Changes: Pretty much the only thing I would change is take the forum profiles and increase them 10-fold.
All in all I'm very satisfied. You get all of the passwords/logins for the properties as well. So I might actually go in there in a week or so and add a short/cheap article in each one just to keep the SE's happy. With such a solid backlink structure it would be dumb not to.
What now? As I said I think it needs way more profiles. I took this and just submitted a 30,000 xrumer blast from Andrey pointing to all of the Web 2.0's, web 2.0 profiles, articles and bookmarks. I also submitted all of the profiles, blog comments, and bookmarks to linklicious.
Awesome.
This Shit is for real. Totally impressed by it.
Communication: Awesome. Told me when it would be done and stuck to it.
Turn around time: 24 hours. (I was first though)
Quality: Bangin! This intricate process really is impressive. I had about 90% of the properties stick (moderation is to be expected). The web 2.0 profiles was a little lower.
Lizardtime over delivered on it though so it all worked out with extra.
Properties: The properties all looked pretty good for what I like. I prefer an extra spun version as compared to readable. This was somewhere in the middle. You could pick out that it is software if you paid attention. I have no problem with this.
The only thing I don't like is that all of my links are at the bottom of the article/site instead of in context. This can not be changed with software such as this I know, just a preference.
Changes: Pretty much the only thing I would change is take the forum profiles and increase them 10-fold.
All in all I'm very satisfied. You get all of the passwords/logins for the properties as well. So I might actually go in there in a week or so and add a short/cheap article in each one just to keep the SE's happy. With such a solid backlink structure it would be dumb not to.
What now? As I said I think it needs way more profiles. I took this and just submitted a 30,000 xrumer blast from Andrey pointing to all of the Web 2.0's, web 2.0 profiles, articles and bookmarks. I also submitted all of the profiles, blog comments, and bookmarks to linklicious.
Awesome.
Update
Thanks for the review.
I agree, the structure could use more profiles. I have decided to up the profiles and the blog comments. I will revise the diagram as soon as complete.
These additional features will be available once the reviews are all complete.
I think I will restructure the link placement as well to get them into the middle of the content immediately, thanks for the feedback on that.
Still 2 review copies available.
Thanks for the review.
I agree, the structure could use more profiles. I have decided to up the profiles and the blog comments. I will revise the diagram as soon as complete.
These additional features will be available once the reviews are all complete.
I think I will restructure the link placement as well to get them into the middle of the content immediately, thanks for the feedback on that.
Still 2 review copies available.
Review Guidelines
1. You cannot ask for or do reviews if you have less than 200 posts and at least 10 itraders.
Banned
O.P do not offer another review to someone that does not qualify our you will be next
Review Guidelines
1. You cannot ask for or do reviews if you have less than 200 posts and at least 10 itraders.
Banned
O.P do not offer another review to someone that does not qualify our you will be next
Oh, I see... I just looked at the iTrade, wasn't paying attention to posts. Sorry about that.
:alert::alert::alert:My honest review:alert::alert::alert:
English is not my mother language (I speak french) so sorry if I make some language mistakes...
The first page contains the site name, accounts and passwords.
The second page, accounts and passwords again.
First bad point, he doesn't always write the url, sometimes you have, for example, "articlecompilation.com" and sometimes you have only the site " Experience Project" name.
The third page contains 18 web2.0, not 20 as mentionned in the first post.
The 4th contains 16 web2.0, so 1 more tha the 15 announced.
So in total 34 web 2.0, not 35.
But ScrapeBox annouces only 17 alives on the 34 web2.0 just 9 hours after I received the report.
The 5th and 6th page contain 38 web2.0 profiles each.
The 7th page contains only 3 articles ! The op says 20 articles.
The first line of the 7th page says: "Most article sites are moderated, so to pull the actual urls for each article, you must log into the article sites individually in a few days."
So I have to check, without the urls, alldays if I get my article ??
The best about the articles. They talk about SEX !!!
My kw was a thailand city name + transport.
WHY DID he choose to talk about SEX ???????????????????
I dont want my website would be associated to SEX !!
I dont know were are the second tier 15 web2.0
It looks like he made the service really fastly without a lot of orders, so what if many customer choose it ?
Does this service worth 200 bucks ? Hell no, for 100 buck you can get for exemple a Katrina Blast which give you more links, with a readable report.
So a lot lot lot of thing before selling this service 200 bucks. Even for the price of the review ($54) it is not a good service, for me.
I would say MAXIMUM 2/10 for this service price.
I WANT THAT ARTICLES SPEAKING ABOUT SEX ARE DELETED.
PS: I will pay the $54 for the review, but I think it will be my last service review of a new member...
English is not my mother language (I speak french) so sorry if I make some language mistakes...
- The report
The first page contains the site name, accounts and passwords.
The second page, accounts and passwords again.
First bad point, he doesn't always write the url, sometimes you have, for example, "articlecompilation.com" and sometimes you have only the site " Experience Project" name.
The third page contains 18 web2.0, not 20 as mentionned in the first post.
The 4th contains 16 web2.0, so 1 more tha the 15 announced.
So in total 34 web 2.0, not 35.
But ScrapeBox annouces only 17 alives on the 34 web2.0 just 9 hours after I received the report.
The 5th and 6th page contain 38 web2.0 profiles each.
The 7th page contains only 3 articles ! The op says 20 articles.
The first line of the 7th page says: "Most article sites are moderated, so to pull the actual urls for each article, you must log into the article sites individually in a few days."
So I have to check, without the urls, alldays if I get my article ??
The best about the articles. They talk about SEX !!!
My kw was a thailand city name + transport.
WHY DID he choose to talk about SEX ???????????????????
I dont want my website would be associated to SEX !!
I dont know were are the second tier 15 web2.0
- My advice about the service.
It looks like he made the service really fastly without a lot of orders, so what if many customer choose it ?
Does this service worth 200 bucks ? Hell no, for 100 buck you can get for exemple a Katrina Blast which give you more links, with a readable report.
So a lot lot lot of thing before selling this service 200 bucks. Even for the price of the review ($54) it is not a good service, for me.
I would say MAXIMUM 2/10 for this service price.
I WANT THAT ARTICLES SPEAKING ABOUT SEX ARE DELETED.
PS: I will pay the $54 for the review, but I think it will be my last service review of a new member...
And now that I look at it, he should have been banned for not having 200 posts.
Im pretty sure this cheap fucker just doesn't want to pay, which he hasn't. I'd say he either has a friend that offers a similar service or his is just a cheap ass troll.
Im pretty sure this cheap fucker just doesn't want to pay, which he hasn't. I'd say he either has a friend that offers a similar service or his is just a cheap ass troll.
And another thing on the french guys review...
I overdelivered on web 2.0 profiles by 35, I overdelivered forum profiles by almost 40, I overdelivered social bookmarks by 30. So he picks out that I shorted him 1 social network? Wow.
I overdelivered on web 2.0 profiles by 35, I overdelivered forum profiles by almost 40, I overdelivered social bookmarks by 30. So he picks out that I shorted him 1 social network? Wow.
For exemple, one article uses the term "prostitution" "sex worker" what is this ??
I accepted to pay but now, you can dream now.
I am here sinds onl one month, I paid for 14 service, I have 100% itrade.
I asked a mod to delete your post were your past urls.
You know nothing about seo !
I accepted to pay but now, you can dream now.
I am here sinds onl one month, I paid for 14 service, I have 100% itrade.
I asked a mod to delete your post were your past urls.
You know nothing about seo !
ONLY 17 of the 35 web2.O ar alive !!
Do you understand that ?
You can deliver 1000 web2.0, if only 1 is alive, it is not what we wait !
Not quite a client, hes lying and also never paid a cent, so is that a client? Don't think so.
You are so full of shit your eyes are brown.
This is why the US hate the French... they are cowards, AND liars.
- Status