I've been trying to get this whole situation solved for over a month now, and i want to know what you guys think about this. Whose at fault, and if the outcome was the right thing that should of happened.
I dont want to name drop here so im just going to use made up names until a final decision is made regarding this.
Okay, so on october 16th, to october 30th i did a media buy for the easyweightlosstea . com offer with Affiliate network 123. This campaign ran for two weeks, and according to the media buy network, here are the results:
10/16/08-10/30/08
584 leads
$15,079.02 Spent
This media buy company tracked all of the conversions by Affiliate network 123placing the conversion pixel on the easyweightlosstea offer.
The media buy company also tracks the conversions and labels them as two different types. Click conversions, and view converions. Click conversions are when the user sees my ad on a website, clicks the ad and then is now on the easyweightlosstea site via my aff link. Once they land on the page, they then go ahead and purchase the product right then and there.
A view based conversion is when the user clicks my ad while they see it browsing the web, they go to the easyweightloss tea page via my affiliate link. Then once they are on the offer page, they then decide to leave and reasearch easyweightloss tea some more before buying. Once there decision to buy is made, they then go to easyweightlosstea . com and make the purchase.
So, over that two week span, out of the 584 leads total, 13 of those leads were "click leads", and the rest were "view leads". Now this may seem odd, but from my other media buys ive ran throughout my time this is normal. On search i tend to get more click based leads, and media buys tend to get more view based leads. So this is quite normal from my experience.
Now heres where it gets weird,
Now according to the stats in Affiliate network 123, over the 2 week course that my media buy ran, Affiliate network 123 only shows 13 leads. That means that Affiliate network 123 only tracked my click leads. 13 showing in Affiliate network 123, 13 click leads showing from the media buy company.
Affiliate network 123 uses a 30 day cookie for thier easy weightloss tea offer, so those 571 leads that occured on the cookie, i should have been counted for those leads correct?
Ex: A user is browsing the web on a weight loss website. They see my box ad for easy weight loss tea. They click the ad which then goes to my Affiliate network 123 affiliate link for easy weight loss tea. They are now on my offer page, and an Affiliate network 123 cookie gets placed on there computer. The user then leaves the site, the next day they type in www . easyweightlosstea . com into there browser, and then buy the product from the direct site. They had the Affiliate network 123 cookie with my ID on there comp, therefore i should get credited for that lead. So where did those 571 view based leads go?
Now, there are a few issues that could have happened which could have caused me not to get credited.
A. There was a problem with Affiliate network 123's cookie. Maybe it wasnt working correctly, but i clicked my affiliate link and i saw the cookie on my comp with my ID. I did not buy the product to test if it got tracked, nor could i get a test lead done, therefore i couldnt prove this was the case.
B. The consumer could have clicked another affiliates link and bought the product after they viewed my page. So the user visited my page, had my cookie on there comp, then did there research on the offer, and when they decided to buy the product they clicked another affiliates link and that affiliate got tracked for the lead.
* This could happen, but i just cant see how this happened 571 times. I would think most consumers would have typed easyweightlosstea . com directly in thier browser.
-------------
Ok now i know somthing was definitly wrong, but didint know what could have caused it so i asked my affiliate manager at Affiliate network 123. I talked to him about it and neither one of us knew why. So he put me in contact with wu-yi direct, so i could talk to them about it.
My affiliate manager at Affiliate network 123, told me that i should get a list of all of the IP addresses , as well as the time of day, and the date of all of the conversions that i reported. This way i can prove that i really did do those 584 leads.
So i emailed wu-yi the list of all the ip addresses/times/date that all caused the pixel to fire.
Wu-yi picked a few random IP's out of my list, since obviously they couldnt do all 584, and the few ip's that they checked all matched up with sales in thier database, which proves that all those ip's that caused my tracking pixel to fire were all unique sales.
So they said theres nothing they can do despite all of the ip's i provided matching up.
What do you think could have caused this, should i have gotten a credit from wu-yi based on the info that i provided them as well as all of the ip addresses matching up to sales in thier database?
Discuss.
I dont want to name drop here so im just going to use made up names until a final decision is made regarding this.
Okay, so on october 16th, to october 30th i did a media buy for the easyweightlosstea . com offer with Affiliate network 123. This campaign ran for two weeks, and according to the media buy network, here are the results:
10/16/08-10/30/08
584 leads
$15,079.02 Spent
This media buy company tracked all of the conversions by Affiliate network 123placing the conversion pixel on the easyweightlosstea offer.
The media buy company also tracks the conversions and labels them as two different types. Click conversions, and view converions. Click conversions are when the user sees my ad on a website, clicks the ad and then is now on the easyweightlosstea site via my aff link. Once they land on the page, they then go ahead and purchase the product right then and there.
A view based conversion is when the user clicks my ad while they see it browsing the web, they go to the easyweightloss tea page via my affiliate link. Then once they are on the offer page, they then decide to leave and reasearch easyweightloss tea some more before buying. Once there decision to buy is made, they then go to easyweightlosstea . com and make the purchase.
So, over that two week span, out of the 584 leads total, 13 of those leads were "click leads", and the rest were "view leads". Now this may seem odd, but from my other media buys ive ran throughout my time this is normal. On search i tend to get more click based leads, and media buys tend to get more view based leads. So this is quite normal from my experience.
Now heres where it gets weird,
Now according to the stats in Affiliate network 123, over the 2 week course that my media buy ran, Affiliate network 123 only shows 13 leads. That means that Affiliate network 123 only tracked my click leads. 13 showing in Affiliate network 123, 13 click leads showing from the media buy company.
Affiliate network 123 uses a 30 day cookie for thier easy weightloss tea offer, so those 571 leads that occured on the cookie, i should have been counted for those leads correct?
Ex: A user is browsing the web on a weight loss website. They see my box ad for easy weight loss tea. They click the ad which then goes to my Affiliate network 123 affiliate link for easy weight loss tea. They are now on my offer page, and an Affiliate network 123 cookie gets placed on there computer. The user then leaves the site, the next day they type in www . easyweightlosstea . com into there browser, and then buy the product from the direct site. They had the Affiliate network 123 cookie with my ID on there comp, therefore i should get credited for that lead. So where did those 571 view based leads go?
Now, there are a few issues that could have happened which could have caused me not to get credited.
A. There was a problem with Affiliate network 123's cookie. Maybe it wasnt working correctly, but i clicked my affiliate link and i saw the cookie on my comp with my ID. I did not buy the product to test if it got tracked, nor could i get a test lead done, therefore i couldnt prove this was the case.
B. The consumer could have clicked another affiliates link and bought the product after they viewed my page. So the user visited my page, had my cookie on there comp, then did there research on the offer, and when they decided to buy the product they clicked another affiliates link and that affiliate got tracked for the lead.
* This could happen, but i just cant see how this happened 571 times. I would think most consumers would have typed easyweightlosstea . com directly in thier browser.
-------------
Ok now i know somthing was definitly wrong, but didint know what could have caused it so i asked my affiliate manager at Affiliate network 123. I talked to him about it and neither one of us knew why. So he put me in contact with wu-yi direct, so i could talk to them about it.
My affiliate manager at Affiliate network 123, told me that i should get a list of all of the IP addresses , as well as the time of day, and the date of all of the conversions that i reported. This way i can prove that i really did do those 584 leads.
So i emailed wu-yi the list of all the ip addresses/times/date that all caused the pixel to fire.
Wu-yi picked a few random IP's out of my list, since obviously they couldnt do all 584, and the few ip's that they checked all matched up with sales in thier database, which proves that all those ip's that caused my tracking pixel to fire were all unique sales.
So they said theres nothing they can do despite all of the ip's i provided matching up.
What do you think could have caused this, should i have gotten a credit from wu-yi based on the info that i provided them as well as all of the ip addresses matching up to sales in thier database?
Discuss.