With the uproar and lawsuits over all the flogs, bizopps, Oprah-anything fallout, alot of WF members have mentioned that they wouldn't promote "scam" rebill offers (at least not anymore).
So, if you were deciding to promote a CPA/rebill offer on a product, what would you want to see that would make it "legit" in your eyes? If the merchant posts nonexistent or tiny font "terms& Conditions" at the bottom, or makes the customer get RMA's, ship back the product, doesn't answer the phones etc, all of those things piss off customers, but they do work in cutting down returns and cancels (at least until an AG or FTC shows up) which equals higher CPAs to affiliates.
Knowing all this, would you be more willing to promote a product that has T&C clearly posted, allows people off rebill without a hassle, etc, even if you knew it was probably going to cut into your conversions/profits? What steps would you like to see the offers you promote take to be less "scammy" (like acai-Oprah-flogs) and more "legit (like Netflix), even if they cost you some short-term profit?
So, if you were deciding to promote a CPA/rebill offer on a product, what would you want to see that would make it "legit" in your eyes? If the merchant posts nonexistent or tiny font "terms& Conditions" at the bottom, or makes the customer get RMA's, ship back the product, doesn't answer the phones etc, all of those things piss off customers, but they do work in cutting down returns and cancels (at least until an AG or FTC shows up) which equals higher CPAs to affiliates.
Knowing all this, would you be more willing to promote a product that has T&C clearly posted, allows people off rebill without a hassle, etc, even if you knew it was probably going to cut into your conversions/profits? What steps would you like to see the offers you promote take to be less "scammy" (like acai-Oprah-flogs) and more "legit (like Netflix), even if they cost you some short-term profit?
