I received a discounted review Article Spin Service from ContentQueen.me.
As some of you may know, I use article spinning in my arsenal of tools. As such, I get pretty picky about the services I use.
I asked ContentQueen and her team to do a spin-level for me that would include sentence spins, word spins and nested spins within the content as well for additional uniqueness.
Overall, ContentQueen's communication was excellent. She was in contact with me often and her service level was very good and accommodating.
There were a few hiccups in delivery. First, the titles of my articles were not spun when my job was delivered to me. ContentQueen graciously said she would fix the problem. She also agreed to add some "null" sentences in the spin for me (this is where selected sentences will randomly disappear in the final spin, changing sentence and word count to make the articles even more unique).
Then, I didn't hear from them for awhile. Several days later I asked about the status, and the additional work apparently just slipped through the cracks. However, she got back to me right away, which was good.
I received the final spin a couple days later.
Overall, the spin seemed pretty good. However, the spinning of the titles appeared rushed, and was not as strong as the body text.
The body text was done pretty well and I'd rate it at an upper medium to medium-high level.
The text spin was good enough that I wanted to edit it and make it perfect. That being said, it took me 2-3 hours to get it polished to the point where I'd put it on a Primary Money Site. Article Spinning, especially at a nested level, is hard, monotonous work.
But I don't think that's the point of this service. I think the quality level of the spun content is WAY better than machine spins or cheap content writing/re-writing services. At this stage, the content is great for populating networks of Web 2.0/Tier One/Tier Two sites or even satellite blog sites - the content is eminently human-readable and will easily pass human review at any of these services. In addition, because of the way the spins were structured for me (word spin, sentence spin, nested spin), the end result is VERY unique content. If I'm not mistaken, they do use The Best Spinner for the content spins.
Some areas that need improvement - capitalization of names (many of the names were not capitalized), use of occasional odd synonym choices, and more attention toward Americanized English (this is my fault as I did not specify), vs. the Queen's English.
I like this spin service……..it is already great for readable Tier One/Two content. And I get the feeling if they can address some issues, stay on top of workflow, and keep a close eye on tighter edits for the final spins, they have the potential to break through at a much higher level.
Regards,
N~