One of a Kind Automated Backlinking Service!

Status
Not open for further replies.
OK - total newbie question here so I expect to get spanked, but my momma always told me the dumbest question is the one not asked so here goes...

How is this service better/different than SEOLinkVine, BuildMyRank and 1WayLinks?

A couple of my sites have just started getting outranked by a competitor who, in the last 6 months, has added about 10000 links from blog posts, (and is adding about 1500/mo), so I'm just learning about this 'blog networking', (for lack of a better term).

Wanna keep it as white hat as possible as these ECommerce sites put food on my table so I can't afford to get dinged by the big G. What I've read here so far makes this sound pretty safe...

Like I said I'm a total newbie to this world and am trying to educate myself as quickly as I can so layman's terms in response would be much appreciated. :p

Thanks!!
 


BurntPickle said:
You posted that yesterday. Yet, today a link push with the current status of "Processing" posted articles today on...

- An Opera account w/ 1500+ posts
- An hPage account that looks like it got nuked
- MonsterArticles account w/ 850+ posts

I'm chalking this up as a transitional issue as you guys weed through all of the old accounts to completely pull them from the rotation. The big question is: how are things going to be handled from here on out...

a) Fresh account for every link push for every site used in that push.
b) All fresh accounts for the upper tier of sites used and lower tiers in the push get spread across a bunch of accounts that get pulled from the rotation after XX number of posts made to them.
c) Same as "b" but with an additional tier of accounts that gets more usage before being pulled from the rotation - maybe for the bookmark sites.
d) Same way you've been doing things but across more accounts. Pulling accounts as they reach XX posts from the rotation?
e) Something different?

There are obvious niche mining issues with anything besides option "a" but lots of services expose people to such risks. It'd simply be nice to know the extent of that exposure before using your service.
Click to expand...

^^^ Can you guys answer these questions. I need to know if I'm going to renew.
 
I initially used the system with fresh accounts per push, but they didn't last long enough. An active account is much better and benefits from other posts on the same account. But I agree that too many posts is not desirable.

We have addressed this and are adding 2000 accounts every week into the system. New accounts will be used frequently at the start and this will reduce as time goes on, but will still be posted to just to keep them alive and valid - but the posts will be infrequent. Some sites will have a limit of the posts/account

We are also adding many additional sites aswell as accounts on the existing sites. This has always been our policy and it constantly freshens up the linkpush, ensures that no footprint exists to be detected. We use a system for choosing sites that we use and they are sites that Google currently ranks so you get posts on the up and coming sites as well as the established traditional sites. This week we have added over 25 new sites into the system and we do this on a weekly basis

I hope this answers your concerns



BurntPickle said:
Originally Posted by BurntPickle
You posted that yesterday. Yet, today a link push with the current status of "Processing" posted articles today on...

- An Opera account w/ 1500+ posts
- An hPage account that looks like it got nuked
- MonsterArticles account w/ 850+ posts

I'm chalking this up as a transitional issue as you guys weed through all of the old accounts to completely pull them from the rotation. The big question is: how are things going to be handled from here on out...

a) Fresh account for every link push for every site used in that push.
b) All fresh accounts for the upper tier of sites used and lower tiers in the push get spread across a bunch of accounts that get pulled from the rotation after XX number of posts made to them.
c) Same as "b" but with an additional tier of accounts that gets more usage before being pulled from the rotation - maybe for the bookmark sites.
d) Same way you've been doing things but across more accounts. Pulling accounts as they reach XX posts from the rotation?
e) Something different?

There are obvious niche mining issues with anything besides option "a" but lots of services expose people to such risks. It'd simply be nice to know the extent of that exposure before using your service.


^^^ Can you guys answer these questions. I need to know if I'm going to renew.
Click to expand...
 
Surfer Dude said:
OK - total newbie question here so I expect to get spanked, but my momma always told me the dumbest question is the one not asked so here goes...

How is this service better/different than SEOLinkVine, BuildMyRank and 1WayLinks?

A couple of my sites have just started getting outranked by a competitor who, in the last 6 months, has added about 10000 links from blog posts, (and is adding about 1500/mo), so I'm just learning about this 'blog networking', (for lack of a better term).

Wanna keep it as white hat as possible as these ECommerce sites put food on my table so I can't afford to get dinged by the big G. What I've read here so far makes this sound pretty safe...

Like I said I'm a total newbie to this world and am trying to educate myself as quickly as I can so layman's terms in response would be much appreciated. :p

Thanks!!
Click to expand...

Of those services, the only 1 I ever looked at was seolinkvine and that was a while ago.

I couldn't tell you if what we offer is better or worse but I am 100% positive what we offer is different.

The coding was all done by Kevin himself... no outsourcing, no finding other code and implementing it so unless someone has some kind of keystroke logger on his computer, our service has to be unique.

Feel free to try it out and you'll see the uniqueness of the service.
 
There have been some questions asked about the new Google algo change and its affects on link building. My opinion is that it should not change your link building strategy. The algo change is brought in to hit content farm type sites like answers sites and eHow, with tons of content and very little links to each page. If anything it emphasizes the need for quality links even more
 
Is this service "safe" enough to use on your money sites or would you use it on your buffer sites - especially in light of Google's latest crackdown??
 
Surfer Dude said:
Is this service "safe" enough to use on your money sites or would you use it on your buffer sites - especially in light of Google's latest crackdown??
Click to expand...

I use it on my money sites all the time... it's white hat backlinking and since the majority of your links are coming from the tiers is is absolutely safe.
 
The linkpush idea is good, but I'm afraid to say its buggy. All the linkpushes I have completed for me have significantly low amount of links, no doc shares at times. I have been emailing back and forth with kevin, and so far it has not been resolved (Kevin said it was resolved when it has not also.)
 
SeoReborn said:
The linkpush idea is good, but I'm afraid to say its buggy. All the linkpushes I have completed for me have significantly low amount of links, no doc shares at times. I have been emailing back and forth with kevin, and so far it has not been resolved (Kevin said it was resolved when it has not also.)
Click to expand...

I just went through all your completed links and saw some of the issues myself. I'll get with Kevin and get you squared away. Also, I would tone down the articles a little as some of the content may be considered edgy by the directories.

You'll end up getting more articles approved I am sure and you'll still get teh benefit of the backlinks.

I'll shoot you an email after I get your issues resolved.
 
LinkPushing said:
I just went through all your completed links and saw some of the issues myself. I'll get with Kevin and get you squared away. Also, I would tone down the articles a little as some of the content may be considered edgy by the directories.

You'll end up getting more articles approved I am sure and you'll still get teh benefit of the backlinks.

I'll shoot you an email after I get your issues resolved.
Click to expand...

I don't think the articles are an issue. The articles were fetched from your system which takes articles from ezine. The microblogging and doc shares have problem too.
 
SeoReborn said:
I don't think the articles are an issue. The articles were fetched from your system which takes articles from ezine. The microblogging and doc shares have problem too.
Click to expand...

I thought that you were using your own copy... I remember when you were first using the system you and I talked about the keywords.

It's clear that the doc share sites are not being built on some of your linpushes and we'll address that and get it set up properly.
 
LinkPushing said:
I thought that you were using your own copy... I remember when you were first using the system you and I talked about the keywords.

It's clear that the doc share sites are not being built on some of your linpushes and we'll address that and get it set up properly.
Click to expand...

Well i take the article that was spinned from best spinner generated from the linkpush and amended it to be more readable + variety, so its still from the same article fetched from your system.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom