Galaxy Contextual Links

Status
Not open for further replies.


Received my report with 17 web 2.0 pages, RSS feeds, and each property appears to be bookmarked once. The wordpress.com page was banned and removed, but the other 16 pages appear to be fine.

The content is pretty readable, spun at the word level, unique enough to pass. The link to the money site was in the first sentence of every property, which is OK I guess. The second link in each property, which is a link to another web 2.0 site, is always out of context at the bottom of each property. You are only allowed one link to your money site and the OP uses the same anchor text on every property.

As of today only one URL and one bookmark are indexed by Google.

Obviously I can't gauge the impact of this campaign on the money site, but I'm guessing that it will have more influence once I can get the pages indexed. I'm running them through some drip feed services, so hopefully everything will be indexed in a month or so.

For the price of $30 I give this service a B+. I think the OP could do more to get the properties indexed - clearly the RSS feeds and single bookmarks are not getting the job done. All in all the service is pretty good, I'd recommend it if you need some quick web 2.0 properties.
 
Picked up one of these off Aquarium69's with a generous discount. Communication was good, replied promptly and took on board what I asked from him. Very quick turnaround and delivered exactly as stated. Uniqueness of article after spinning around 50%. Overall decent service.
 
Thanks mate for the good feedback!

Hope we can work together..


Received my report with 17 web 2.0 pages, RSS feeds, and each property appears to be bookmarked once. The wordpress.com page was banned and removed, but the other 16 pages appear to be fine.

The content is pretty readable, spun at the word level, unique enough to pass. The link to the money site was in the first sentence of every property, which is OK I guess. The second link in each property, which is a link to another web 2.0 site, is always out of context at the bottom of each property. You are only allowed one link to your money site and the OP uses the same anchor text on every property.

As of today only one URL and one bookmark are indexed by Google.

Obviously I can't gauge the impact of this campaign on the money site, but I'm guessing that it will have more influence once I can get the pages indexed. I'm running them through some drip feed services, so hopefully everything will be indexed in a month or so.

For the price of $30 I give this service a B+. I think the OP could do more to get the properties indexed - clearly the RSS feeds and single bookmarks are not getting the job done. All in all the service is pretty good, I'd recommend it if you need some quick web 2.0 properties.
 
Thanks So Much Mate! :)



Picked up one of these off Aquarium69's with a generous discount. Communication was good, replied promptly and took on board what I asked from him. Very quick turnaround and delivered exactly as stated. Uniqueness of article after spinning around 50%. Overall decent service.
 
Speed: 5/5 - Report sent the next day.

Communication: 5/5 - No problems here

Price: 4/5 - These are posts on blogs/web 2.0's backed up with RSS and Bookmarking. It's decent enough for the price.

Quality: 3/5 - Mainly because of the standard of article, which always lets these things down. It might not matter so much and the important thing is the uniqueness.

Other than this the report was very clear, and all the links were there apart from one or two bookmarks.

Overall Review: 4/5 - Good for the price and no better or worse than many of the other similar services around. Not seen any ranking change yet.
 
Thanks mate,


Speed: 5/5 - Report sent the next day.

Communication: 5/5 - No problems here

Price: 4/5 - These are posts on blogs/web 2.0's backed up with RSS and Bookmarking. It's decent enough for the price.

Quality: 3/5 - Mainly because of the standard of article, which always lets these things down. It might not matter so much and the important thing is the uniqueness.

Other than this the report was very clear, and all the links were there apart from one or two bookmarks.

Overall Review: 4/5 - Good for the price and no better or worse than many of the other similar services around. Not seen any ranking change yet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.