The 50%LINKS Blogs High PR, Strong, Unique, 50%Links Blog Posts Like Never Before
- Thread starter jacky8
- Start date
- Status
Jack did a 2 x PR5 Blog posts for me. Sites were legit and as he says, these don't look like a spam infested network, they legit.
Turn around time was great...he had my order done in about 3 days with 2 articles scheduled.
Quality 5/5
Price 5/5
These will help balance low quality links with some nice juice. Use them wisely.
Got a couple other sites I'll be ordering these for.
Thanks, Jack!
Turn around time was great...he had my order done in about 3 days with 2 articles scheduled.
Quality 5/5
Price 5/5
These will help balance low quality links with some nice juice. Use them wisely.
Got a couple other sites I'll be ordering these for.
Thanks, Jack!
All 3 of these are probably just looking to increase post counts.
Can't you see the skype icon below my avatar? Click it and add me
I want to order and wondering how long will they stay on front page ? Accept any niche ? ( not talking about porn shit like stuff)
Thanks
Thanks
i received a review, so here goes. keep in mind that i don't write nice things just because i got a freebie or a discount. i've also decided to stop giving numbered grades because i've found that people rarely interpret them the way i intended.
the domain is a solid pr5 with some decent edu linkage. i haven't looked at it in as much detail as if i were evaluating it for purchase, but the links i've looked at have been in place for a while and are likely to stick (a lot are on deep pages on .edus which noone ever link-checks or updates), so i would estimate the chance of it dropping pr to be quite low. to put this in perspective for you, although it isn't the strongest pr5 i've ever seen (hence the lack of superlatives), it is among the strongest i've seen offered as a service (certainly in this price range) and i've reviewed quite a few.
the article doesn't appear to be original, but i can't tell if it's a rewrite or a handspin executed well. in any case, it is unique, perfectly readable, makes sense and got indexed without too much trouble. unless a blog is niche specific and very well executed (at a considerably higher price), it wouldn't survive a manual review anyway, so whether an article is original hardly matters - there's nothing wrong with it that could in practice be detected algorithmically.
threw 700 blog comments from indexed pages at it (a freebie from hkseo/ohb) via 2 urls (the trailing slash and no trailing slash version which 301s) a couple days after it went live and saw movement almost immediately. i used two anchors, keyword1 is a high cpc ($20+), low search volume (~1k) mid-comp (serpiq in the 40s) exact match anchor for my emd. second is lower volume pointed at the www of my domain, which 301s to the non-www variant. kw1 went from 10th page to #14, kw2 wasn't being tracked previously but moved to #11. currently dancing for both, dropping in and out. naturally, cooccurrence does not imply causation; i've seen another emd move up to the first page at about the same time, so results could be partially algo related. however, although i can not categorically exclude that possibility, i consider it to be highly unlikely.
all in all, a fair value on a good domain and a link i wouldn't mind having in tier1 for sites i actually care about. given that i almost never praise a service to the heavens (unless it transforms water into wine), that's high praise indeed.
-p
the domain is a solid pr5 with some decent edu linkage. i haven't looked at it in as much detail as if i were evaluating it for purchase, but the links i've looked at have been in place for a while and are likely to stick (a lot are on deep pages on .edus which noone ever link-checks or updates), so i would estimate the chance of it dropping pr to be quite low. to put this in perspective for you, although it isn't the strongest pr5 i've ever seen (hence the lack of superlatives), it is among the strongest i've seen offered as a service (certainly in this price range) and i've reviewed quite a few.
the article doesn't appear to be original, but i can't tell if it's a rewrite or a handspin executed well. in any case, it is unique, perfectly readable, makes sense and got indexed without too much trouble. unless a blog is niche specific and very well executed (at a considerably higher price), it wouldn't survive a manual review anyway, so whether an article is original hardly matters - there's nothing wrong with it that could in practice be detected algorithmically.
threw 700 blog comments from indexed pages at it (a freebie from hkseo/ohb) via 2 urls (the trailing slash and no trailing slash version which 301s) a couple days after it went live and saw movement almost immediately. i used two anchors, keyword1 is a high cpc ($20+), low search volume (~1k) mid-comp (serpiq in the 40s) exact match anchor for my emd. second is lower volume pointed at the www of my domain, which 301s to the non-www variant. kw1 went from 10th page to #14, kw2 wasn't being tracked previously but moved to #11. currently dancing for both, dropping in and out. naturally, cooccurrence does not imply causation; i've seen another emd move up to the first page at about the same time, so results could be partially algo related. however, although i can not categorically exclude that possibility, i consider it to be highly unlikely.
all in all, a fair value on a good domain and a link i wouldn't mind having in tier1 for sites i actually care about. given that i almost never praise a service to the heavens (unless it transforms water into wine), that's high praise indeed.
-p
just realized i'd forgotten to review the actual '50% links' bit and i really should have, since that is enough of a selling point that jack's put it in the name of the service 
indeed, there are plenty of posts on the blog without links. generally, it appears that when they make a post with your links they also post one on the same topic without the links. the two articles are not similar at all from a uniqueness perspective and the quality is the same for both; in fact, i liked the one without my links in it a bit better. the articles are very well done from a theming perspective as well - if you think g does topic/theme analysis and therefore care about such things, the two articles would be very likely algorithmically determined to be on the same theme/topic. whether you care depends on whether you think this sort of stuff matters, but it can't hurt and may very well be advantageous, if not now then as a bit of futureproofing.
overall, i think this is very much the smart thing to do. links in every post is a massive statistical outlier, so even if it's not being used as a signal now, it's low hanging enough fruit to be included in the next round of bestiality google molests us with (hippo anyone?). so thumbs up and i wish other vendors did something similar. i certainly do it on my private high pr blogs already (along with co-citation).
-p
indeed, there are plenty of posts on the blog without links. generally, it appears that when they make a post with your links they also post one on the same topic without the links. the two articles are not similar at all from a uniqueness perspective and the quality is the same for both; in fact, i liked the one without my links in it a bit better. the articles are very well done from a theming perspective as well - if you think g does topic/theme analysis and therefore care about such things, the two articles would be very likely algorithmically determined to be on the same theme/topic. whether you care depends on whether you think this sort of stuff matters, but it can't hurt and may very well be advantageous, if not now then as a bit of futureproofing.
overall, i think this is very much the smart thing to do. links in every post is a massive statistical outlier, so even if it's not being used as a signal now, it's low hanging enough fruit to be included in the next round of bestiality google molests us with (hippo anyone?). so thumbs up and i wish other vendors did something similar. i certainly do it on my private high pr blogs already (along with co-citation).
-p
There are quite a few reviews. More should be coming soon. If you have any questions, feel free to ask
just realized i'd forgotten to review the actual '50% links' bit and i really should have, since that is enough of a selling point that jack's put it in the name of the service
indeed, there are plenty of posts on the blog without links. generally, it appears that when they make a post with your links they also post one on the same topic without the links. the two articles are not similar at all from a uniqueness perspective and the quality is the same for both; in fact, i liked the one without my links in it a bit better. the articles are very well done from a theming perspective as well - if you think g does topic/theme analysis and therefore care about such things, the two articles would be very likely algorithmically determined to be on the same theme/topic. whether you care depends on whether you think this sort of stuff matters, but it can't hurt and may very well be advantageous, if not now then as a bit of futureproofing.
overall, i think this is very much the smart thing to do. links in every post is a massive statistical outlier, so even if it's not being used as a signal now, it's low hanging enough fruit to be included in the next round of bestiality google molests us with (hippo anyone?). so thumbs up and i wish other vendors did something similar. i certainly do it on my private high pr blogs already (along with co-citation).
-p
Thanks a lot for the detailed reviews paulieg. Much appreciate!
I've just sent a bunch of reports and sending more within a couple of hours. Up for more orders now!
- Status