Ok so I guess this is a racist thread now.
Recently I saw a documentary about new DNA results from Neanderthals.
First, apparently Neanderthals were not stupid monkeys as Hollywood tries to suggest, but rather just different than homo sapiens, and bigger plus stronger.
Now, apparently homo sapiens moved to Europe and mated with Neanderthals.
There were far less Neanderthals than homo sapiens, that's why Neanderthals disappeared, they were kind of absorbed by homo sapiens.
However, point is that Asian and Caucasian people still have ~3% (I think) of Neanderthals DNA, while sub-saharan African people don't since they stayed there and didn't go to Europe.
I'm not saying that this is good or bad for either of them, but could it make a difference between them?
Recently I saw a documentary about new DNA results from Neanderthals.
First, apparently Neanderthals were not stupid monkeys as Hollywood tries to suggest, but rather just different than homo sapiens, and bigger plus stronger.
Now, apparently homo sapiens moved to Europe and mated with Neanderthals.
There were far less Neanderthals than homo sapiens, that's why Neanderthals disappeared, they were kind of absorbed by homo sapiens.
However, point is that Asian and Caucasian people still have ~3% (I think) of Neanderthals DNA, while sub-saharan African people don't since they stayed there and didn't go to Europe.
I'm not saying that this is good or bad for either of them, but could it make a difference between them?