9/11

Just find one fucking person who says they had a direct hand in it, just one. None of you fucking retards can because it wasn't an inside job. If it really was a conspiracy somebody would have some actual proof, it's just too big not to leave a trail the logistics of what you idiots claim happened would be staggering.

Oh and look what comes up first when you google "twin towers free fall speed"

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - Free Fall

hidden66 / blueRAP,

If we all tell you we believe you will you promise to leave the country and make no further mention of this?

I hesitate to mention this but but you are getting too close to the truth, I am an actual CIA operative that was placed to monitor known agitators on WickedFire (my handler is Steve Waggenheim) and talk has already begun about silencing you. As we speak the Director of the CIA, the Zionists, and the highest echelons of the Mossad are in talks with Jon to remove this thread from WF (Leon Panetta, Director of the CIA, thinks Mossad will have an easier time convincing Jon since they have that Jew thing in common.)

You need to get out before "Operation Two Knuckles Deep" is put into action, silence must be maintained until gold hit's $1500 an ounce and all outstanding debt in the hands of the Chinese is exchanged for McDonald's dollar menu coupons.

We are at the precipice of the New World Order!

TinfoilHat.jpg

probably a disinfo/shill agent

Dont forget everyone over 1 million iraqis MURDERED

Bush/Blair guilty of war crimes
 


This is the kinda shit you just forget about because there's no way you can do anything other then make yourself look like a fool. Why do that when you can be chillin?
 
on this: Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - Free Fall

BTW I wrote this not just copy pasted.

He states: The towers fell at free fall speed

I think most people are looking at the videos and determining that they looked like each floor gave very little resistance and they fell and looked like controlled demolitions.

Several reporters said that on the air live. Some expert said in the days after that it looked like a controlled demolition.

Most people were assuming that later it would be found that the "terrorists" had somehow got in and set some demolitions and it was able to topple the buildings.

He talks about pyroclastic flow, like that means something.

I really do not know who is saying what happened is exactly like a volcano.

But I think people are saying it looked like that. And they have seen volcanoes and they have seen the flow of debris from the WTC buildings.

If things aren’t burnt is because it was not a damn volcano.

He calculates the TOTAL energy of all the materials and comes up with a number of 272kt of TNT.

Ignoring the lengthy calculation and his assumptions we could accept it.

And then ask why or how would all that energy be deposited to breaking concrete and steel welds and throwing concrete all over?

If you take a brick and throw it at another brick, the force of the first brick is not perfectly transferred to the other brick. Even if a perfect throw and the first brick stops and does not deflect at all there are waste in this process, Heat, light, friction are all wastes in almost all transfers.

There was not 272 kt of power to start this process or at any one point in the process. It was a total and if there was some way to transfer it in some huge solid base maybe one could use the power of gravity for something.

Later he talks about setting charges in the buildings and that a smaller building took 24 days. Who really cares? If I blew up my house and it is one story and is 4 bedroom and took 3 days to setup the charges does that mean that a 110 story building would take 330 days? It is a stupid argument. People makes changes to plans, different people do things differently, and some projects have more funding.

If this is true this project was VERY important, had to look right, and had to be believed at least for a few years to allow invading countries and crushing personal liberties.

Most people think that Kennedy was assassinated by more than one person. How long did that take to plan? Who cares? If a bank gets robbed do the police investigators really worry how long it took to plan?

And if this building fell by accident by some aluminium plane hitting them and these were well planned building why aren’t we changing, rebuilding or condemning all buildings in the USA? They weren’t built significantly better than these buildings. Some were 110 stories but one was 47. There are lots of 47 story buildings worldwide. Have they been fixed?
 
mind you, this is no simple "animation", it's a Finite Element Analysis, a very powerful calculation of stress/strain and other factors. It is accurate for all of the materials.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOKJ4ZXgK4Q"]YouTube- Broadcast Yourself.[/ame]
 
LOL...and the left slam the birthers EVERY single day on the fake news channels. There is more evidence that BO is an illegal alien than their is that 9/11 was an inside job.

For some reason I HATE liberals more when I am high. SO here is to you...FUCK YOU
LIBERAL FUCKS!
 
LOL...and the left slam the birthers EVERY single day on the fake news channels. There is more evidence that BO is an illegal alien than their is that 9/11 was an inside job.

For some reason I HATE liberals more when I am high. SO here is to you...FUCK YOU
LIBERAL FUCKS!

do you support legalization of weed? not a bait question, real question.
 
do you support legalization of weed? not a bait question, real question.

Honestly...Im not sure. It is far less harmful than alcohol but I don't want people smoking them like cigs ( taking weed breaks at work and shit ). I can't answer your question truthfully because I haven't really come to a conclusion myself.

EDIT: I wouldnt have a problem with people smoking it..growing it in their own homes. Outside of the home it still needs to be prohibited. Maybe allow only in places that liquer is sold.
 
Honestly...Im not sure. It is far less harmful than alcohol but I don't want people smoking them like cigs ( taking weed breaks at work and shit ). I can't answer your question truthfully because I haven't really come to a conclusion myself.

EDIT: I wouldnt have a problem with people smoking it..growing it in their own homes. Outside of the home it still needs to be prohibited. Maybe allow only in places that liquer is sold.

how about treating it the same as alcohol? DUI penalties, smoking in a pot friendly bar is OK but not in a public place, etc
 
I think most people are looking at the videos and determining that they looked like each floor gave very little resistance and they fell and looked like controlled demolitions.

Duh! It did look like a controlled demolition because it worked just like one. When all the jet fuel burned it weakened the steel causing it to give way. This lead to the floor(s) above it to fall onto that floor. This exceeded the live load of the building and it continued all the way down as each succeeding floor gave way.

This is how demo down large buildings. They don't blow the bottom floor because there is risk of it falling over. The blow higher floors and the building collapses on it's self.

There was no conspiracy, OP is an idiot.
 
no large planes hit there targets on 9/11

This is true, if you go on youtube and search 9/11 ufo you will actually find out that those "ufos" were floating hologram projectors that were developed at area 51 to project the 2 planes that didn't actually exist crashing into the twin towers, they actually just blew them up with explosives so they could invade iraq and loose billions of dollars and public relations to get abit of oil... :drinkup: