How I Lost $4,600 through COPEAC



you-have-been-virtually-bitch-slapped.gif


I'm bringing it back.
 
Jon said:
Respectfully,

Jon
Click to expand...


mkrongel said:
OK so i asked my team what happened here. You werent running an EDU offer but an email submit that you iframed. So since you tried to scam the offer by i-framing it the advertiser caught the shit leads and we in turn scrubbed you for the crap you sent.

Your excuse to us that you only iframed for one day will not hold water since it was caught (whenever a scammer is caught its always i just did it a little bit dont scrub me 100%). People typically iframe an email submit offer to change the offer from a free ipad to free porn or something like that.

Sorry but since you tried to scam the offer you wont be paid. Also making threads on WF like this makes you look dumb especially since you not being paid is to no ones fault but your own.
Click to expand...


blackguylaughingu.gif
 
If iframing is banned - why didn't the advertiser have frame busting code on the landing page?

Every email submit advertiser I know does that.

<SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript">
<!--
if (top.frames.length!=0)
top.location=self.document.location;
// -->
</SCRIPT>
 
Jon said:
Robert-

You're a cocksucker for coming here as a brand new user and griping about an issue you've had to help it get resolved. I don't like it when WF gets used by people who "have been in the industry for 2 years" and have never come here to contribute until they have a problem and no where else to run. You sir are a leech. We don't like leeches.

Goodluck on getting your monies with Copeac (you mentioned their name 16x in your post! lulz) but you'll have to resort to using your own stupid methods of getting that done.

This will happen to anyone else who feels the need to make a new account, gripe about their situation with any network or industry issue, and then falls off the face of the planet only to return again when they have another issue they need to resolve.

Respectfully,

Jon
Click to expand...

Beat me to it.
 
tjewsky said:
If iframing is banned - why didn't the advertiser have frame busting code on the landing page?

Every email submit advertiser I know does that.

<SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript">
<!--
if (top.frames.length!=0)
top.location=self.document.location;
// -->
</SCRIPT>
Click to expand...
I obviously don't know exactly what happened, but my educated guess says the guy was doing invalid iframing. In other words, he was using cakeslice, godcpa or something similar to wrap an iframe around the submit area only, cutting out the details of the offer and preventing the surfer from completing the regpath.

The merchant might not want to break out of iframes, because some search marketers will take their own domain and do a 100% iframe on an e-mail submit (which is legitimate).
 
MaxSteve said:
I obviously don't know exactly what happened, but my educated guess says the guy was doing invalid iframing. In other words, he was using cakeslice, godcpa or something similar to wrap an iframe around the submit area only, cutting out the details of the offer and preventing the surfer from completing the regpath.

The merchant might not want to break out of iframes, because some search marketers will take their own domain and do a 100% iframe on an e-mail submit (which is legitimate).
Click to expand...

He was doing it legit Steve, that's why I'm really confused about it all.

It's a terrible situation where the advertiser is blatantly stealing. The iframing took place over 48 hours (I personally helped him set up the server) but they decided to take leads for 3 weeks.

Oh well, live and learn I guess.
 
profitaddiction said:
He was doing it legit Steve, that's why I'm really confused about it all.

It's a terrible situation where the advertiser is blatantly stealing. The iframing took place over 48 hours (I personally helped him set up the server) but they decided to take leads for 3 weeks.

Oh well, live and learn I guess.
Click to expand...

So he breaks the rules but you think the advertiser is the asshole? Is that what happened or am I just totally buzzed and confused?

(or was it legit? Sorry, like I said I'm slow)
 
profitaddiction said:
He was doing it legit Steve, that's why I'm really confused about it all.

It's a terrible situation where the advertiser is blatantly stealing. The iframing took place over 48 hours (I personally helped him set up the server) but they decided to take leads for 3 weeks.

Oh well, live and learn I guess.
Click to expand...

If the leads backed out for the advertiser, they wouldn't have chargebacked them.
 
ChrisS said:
So he breaks the rules but you think the advertiser is the asshole? Is that what happened or am I just totally buzzed and confused?

(or was it legit? Sorry, like I said I'm slow)
Click to expand...

Oh he definitely broke the rules, but from everything I have ever experienced, the advertiser has only taken leads from the duration that the rules were broken, not ALL traffic that had been run.
 
sgtryan said:
screenshots, logs, or nothing ever happened
Click to expand...

Most of the shit can't even be screen-shotted at this point. You don't know that terms are going to be changed beforehand, and after the fact... well, 20/20 hindsight.

Krongel said case closed though.

I think use this as a warning that some advertisers will fuck you as hard as they can with even the slightest inclination of wrongdoing. Be careful.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom