Adwords takeover - How I think it is done

Status
Not open for further replies.
Although I have not posted, or replied to, discussion threads about my advertising methods, I wish to dispell some myths on how I'm doing it. To start, I once was a compliant advertiser, however, after seeing my competitors violating the rules constantly, I had a choice to make, either find a way to compete and dominate them, or quit. I do not give up that easily.

First, I have never, nor will I, participate in criminal activity. I do not use stolen credit cards/numbers or identities. Also, I do not use "automation" or hacking tricks to fix the quality score. In most cases, quality or always better than quantity, but not in this case.

Over a four-month period (between June and September of the year) I reversed engineered a system to overcome my competitors. Although I will not "spill the beans" about exactly how I do it, I can tell you that the quantity aspect of the process was needed to find out what works and what doesn't. At first, I was always looking for a way through Google, when I should have been looking for a way around Google.

To say the least, I'm a symptom of a larger problem regarding advertisers' abusing Google's policies and looking for ways to beat the system. Maybe I figured it out, maybe I didn't/

I simply wanted to say my piece regarding stolen credit cards. In closing, Google has a loophole. Finding that loophole was the hard part. My practices are no different from the noobie looking to gain an edge in search marketing, it is just on a different scale.

Anyways, hope that cleared up some discussions on stolen credit cards.
 


A google loophole, you say? LOL, fake some screenshots and sell us your ebook kthnx. I can already visualize the sales letter....


There are no loopholes, and there are no shortcuts.
 
RingtoneMan, thank you for the post. When you are talking about a loophole, I am assuming you mean something that's legal but against Google's TOS, right? Have you been able to use this loophole only on Google, or on other search engines as well?
 
All I'm saying is that I found a system that has worked and still works for me. I certainly don't need to sell a book, as I'm making more than enough money from commissions.

You are correct, it is of course something against the policies of Google, but no different than the common person trying take advantage of the system in their own little way.
 
yevlesh said:
RingtoneMan, thank you for the post. When you are talking about a loophole, I am assuming you mean something that's legal but against Google's TOS, right? Have you been able to use this loophole only on Google, or on other search engines as well?
Click to expand...

You're an idiot, much like the other idiots posting in this thread.
 
No loopholes. If you want to run multiple accounts with little or no scrutiny, become a google approved SEM and open a my client center account where you can manage multiple accounts. Make your multiple accounts, each with ads running to a different domain name. If G asks, the stock answer is this the niche i specialize SEM in. That usually shuts them up. If they get real irritable, you tell them you will can your "client" who will be replaced by another "client" in the same niche. The real trick is defeating the QS. That's done with DNS server trickery. Big HINT: Your display url can be a variation of the final destination url. Final destination url can be overriden by another URL which will be your redirect on a keyword level! Shelf life is about 3 months unless your a retard like the ringtone guy and make it obvious. Oh yeah, you still need large cash to do this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom