All in one Package Mini-Link Pyramid Boost your SERP Fast & Effective

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Compaq

Banned
Aug 30, 2011
24
0
0
15 Washington St Hempstead NY
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
LinkPyramidPowerLogosite1.png




Hello Everyone,

Do you want:

Hundreds of quality backlinks, automatically created for you every month?
To see your website steadily rise through the Google rankings?
Have content created every month without you lifting a finger?
To absolutely CRUSH your competition?
To do this without the hefty $147/mo price tag?



20 Web 2.0
50-80 High PR DoFollow Social Bookmarking
80-100 Article Directory Submission
150 High PR Profile Linking
80-100 .edu Blog Commenting

+
EXTRA 2 SENUKE X BLAST FOR YOUR MONEY SITES



To Explain the flow of the Link Pyramid this well it goes Web 2.0 Properties has 2 links all are point to the money site. then social bookmarking point to all web 2.0 properties. then Article Directory has 2 links 1 for the money and 1 link for web 2.0 also. for profile links it will point to all the article directory submission.

.edu Blog Commenting will stick to the money site.

Hope you understand the flow of my Link Pyramid the most effective SEO Strategy now a days.

PM me if have some Clarifications and Suggesstions
_______________________________________________

Time Period: 4-5 Days (it depends to your order)

GOLD PACKAGE

25$ per URL

15$ for the first week
(Or REVIEW PACKAGE)

NEEDED:

  • URL's
  • KEYWORDS
  • ARTICLE
  • EMAIL TO SEND MY REPORT
PAYMENT METHOD:

VIA PAYPAL:p

Make your payment: kharen.labadia@gmail.com


I will give 10% discount for the 5 SENIOR MEMBERS who will take Bulk Orders


Dresden14 said:
Review:

Report received next business day. Provider was extremely fast in getting the job done. The web 2.0's all passed, excellent service. Already saw a serp boost from position 10 to position 6 on an internal page (and its only day 1). I left you an itrader, do the same. Hope you continue to be an asset here at w/f!!
Click to expand...
 


I was going to inquire about your review package, but I'm not entirely sure what I'll be getting. What does "the first week" have to do with anything?
 
REVIEW

Received my review within a couple days and here's what I got:

- 20 Web 2.0 sites, 19 are still alive. The Squidoo lens only has one content widget, so it will get flagged as WIP and become unsearchable in a couple days. Only one Web 2.0 property is indexed to date. Each property has a spun article, which appears to have been spun on word level from a single seed article.

- 31 total bookmarks, although a couple seem to be duplicates, a couple are dead, and a couple (like Newsvine) are sure to be dead in a few days. They all link back to the Web 2.0 properties with the same anchor text as the HTML title tag on my money site, which I found odd but probably won't cause any problems.

31 bookmarks is not the 50-80 originally stated by OP.

- 17 RSS feeds. Some of them are the RSS feeds from the bookmarking accounts, some of them are the RSS feeds from the Web 2.0 properties, and a couple are feeds from Web 2.0 properties (like wordpress.com) that apparently were deleted because they were not listed in the Web 2.0 report and they don't have any valid links within them. These are pretty much useless.

- 110 profiles, each with 2 links back to my money site even though OP said they would go to the articles. I would much rather have had the profile links point to the Web 2.0 pages or articles if OP actually did articles for me. I hate pointing profiles and spammy blog comments at my money sites.

110 profiles is not the 150 stated by OP

- 0 articles or article directory submissions. 0 is not the 80-100 originally stated by OP.

- 0 edu blog comments, which is just short of the 80-100 originally stated by OP.

Obviously I was misinformed about this service, because more than half of my report is missing and now I have profile links pointing at my money site. I guess the Web 2.0 properties are OK though.

Speed: 9 out 10
Communication: 3 out of 10 - I obviously missed something. OP could have mentioned he was going to point profiles at my money site.
Quality: 4 out of 10 - half of the report is missing, plus whatever else I said up above.
Price: 9 out of 10 - $25 is a fair price if OP actually delivers what he states in the sales post.

Overall: 5 out of 10

To improve this service, improve communication. I don't know if you are really going to deliver the full service to new client or if you are going to deliver half of a service with profile links pointing at the money site, like you delivered to me. On the upside, the OP seems really friendly. It pains me to leave a less-than-glowing review for the service.
 
Received my review within a couple days and here's what I got:

- 20 Web 2.0 sites, 19 are still alive. The Squidoo lens only has one content widget, so it will get flagged as WIP and become unsearchable in a couple days. Only one Web 2.0 property is indexed to date. Each property has a spun article, which appears to have been spun on word level from a single seed article.

- 31 total bookmarks, although a couple seem to be duplicates, a couple are dead, and a couple (like Newsvine) are sure to be dead in a few days. They all link back to the Web 2.0 properties with the same anchor text as the HTML title tag on my money site, which I found odd but probably won't cause any problems.

31 bookmarks is not the 50-80 originally stated by OP.

- 17 RSS feeds. Some of them are the RSS feeds from the bookmarking accounts, some of them are the RSS feeds from the Web 2.0 properties, and a couple are feeds from Web 2.0 properties (like wordpress.com) that apparently were deleted because they were not listed in the Web 2.0 report and they don't have any valid links within them. These are pretty much useless.

- 110 profiles, each with 2 links back to my money site even though OP said they would go to the articles. I would much rather have had the profile links point to the Web 2.0 pages or articles if OP actually did articles for me. I hate pointing profiles and spammy blog comments at my money sites.

110 profiles is not the 150 stated by OP

- 0 articles or article directory submissions. 0 is not the 80-100 originally stated by OP.

- 0 edu blog comments, which is just short of the 80-100 originally stated by OP.

Obviously I was misinformed about this service, because more than half of my report is missing and now I have profile links pointing at my money site. I guess the Web 2.0 properties are OK though.

Speed: 9 out 10
Communication: 3 out of 10 - I obviously missed something. OP could have mentioned he was going to point profiles at my money site.
Quality: 4 out of 10 - half of the report is missing, plus whatever else I said up above.
Price: 9 out of 10 - $25 is a fair price if OP actually delivers what he states in the sales post.

Overall: 5 out of 10

To improve this service, improve communication. I don't know if you are really going to deliver the full service to new client or if you are going to deliver half of a service with profile links pointing at the money site, like you delivered to me. On the upside, the OP seems really friendly. It pains me to leave a less-than-glowing review for the service.
Click to expand...
__________________
Build Muscle
Gay Affiliate Marketing Blog
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work." - Thomas Edison
Click to expand...


Thanks for the comment sir. I will improved next time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom