Alright, time for my review. I was trying to wait out google and post a review after I see what the rankings come in at; but I've realized that it isn't fair to do so since I chose the keywords and they could be much more competitive then I first thought...
So at any rate, I'd like to say that Conzistenzee is a very good package for the price for those who should appreciate a scalable, multi-level links package.
You know, All SEOers.
I got the whole package delivered at once in a reasonable timeframe and the report was beautiful. In a zip file together came several folders full of the content, both text and with spintax, a listing of links to throw in a DFB/xrumer blast, the artwork, and even photo proof that he'd used a ubot to do RSS submissions for my package's links to get the spiders crawling.
In the report, a single spreadsheet workbook, there were 5 pages with all of the web properties listed beside their login credentials. Very good stuff.
They did a very good job of lining up which link went where, and using which anchor text. -This was a very welcome plus.
Negatives? There were only 2 small things I could point out that could use improvement with this package.
I know that this package is an improvement over a previous service which was criticsized for having poor spinning quality on the top web 2.0 properties...
My top 3 properties were not awful by any means, and I bet they will all survive, but my biggest problem with this package is that the top properties look pretty much the same as the 2nd-tier properties, just with an added picture.
I choose blogger, wordpress, and weebly, and all three looked just fine, but not much of an improvement over the 25 sites linking to them in terms of content and page 'bulk.'
The other small nitpick I have is that the top-tier blogs have tiny, generic front pages, (1st posts) ahead of the 'good content' post... Not that I'd expect them to write a thoughtful peice for it, but we're literally talking about 20 words or less and I'd think this could turn into a footprint over time. So I'd suggest beefing that up with something slightly more on-topic and at least doubly as wordy.
All links seem to be working and the linking structure is awesome. I have no other complaints, and the two above are not serious enough to make me reconsider my purchase at all.
I look forward to grabbing more packages in the future! Thanks for the excellent value, onkelmicha!
-Luke
So at any rate, I'd like to say that Conzistenzee is a very good package for the price for those who should appreciate a scalable, multi-level links package.
You know, All SEOers.
I got the whole package delivered at once in a reasonable timeframe and the report was beautiful. In a zip file together came several folders full of the content, both text and with spintax, a listing of links to throw in a DFB/xrumer blast, the artwork, and even photo proof that he'd used a ubot to do RSS submissions for my package's links to get the spiders crawling.
In the report, a single spreadsheet workbook, there were 5 pages with all of the web properties listed beside their login credentials. Very good stuff.
They did a very good job of lining up which link went where, and using which anchor text. -This was a very welcome plus.
Negatives? There were only 2 small things I could point out that could use improvement with this package.
I know that this package is an improvement over a previous service which was criticsized for having poor spinning quality on the top web 2.0 properties...
My top 3 properties were not awful by any means, and I bet they will all survive, but my biggest problem with this package is that the top properties look pretty much the same as the 2nd-tier properties, just with an added picture.
I choose blogger, wordpress, and weebly, and all three looked just fine, but not much of an improvement over the 25 sites linking to them in terms of content and page 'bulk.'
The other small nitpick I have is that the top-tier blogs have tiny, generic front pages, (1st posts) ahead of the 'good content' post... Not that I'd expect them to write a thoughtful peice for it, but we're literally talking about 20 words or less and I'd think this could turn into a footprint over time. So I'd suggest beefing that up with something slightly more on-topic and at least doubly as wordy.
All links seem to be working and the linking structure is awesome. I have no other complaints, and the two above are not serious enough to make me reconsider my purchase at all.
I look forward to grabbing more packages in the future! Thanks for the excellent value, onkelmicha!
-Luke
