Cops Arrest Man for Filming then Murder his Dog

kingofsp

WF Premium Member
Mar 1, 2008
5,325
152
0
Los Angeles
If you're just trying to have a nice relaxing Tuesday then you might not want to watch.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ej-2FlWGWcU](MIRROR) L.A. TRIGGER HAPPY COP SHOOT DOG FOR BARKING - YouTube[/ame]
 


Tired of hearing how cops are being "attacked" by dogs (happening every day in every city in America), just so they can find a reason to kill something. Notice how this cop came from the back and just started shooting, while the other cops had the situation under control. The dog was not showing aggression.

Fuckin' pig. They'll do an "internal investigation" where they take his statement and then they'll send their PR boy out to say the dog was attacking him. Same shit, different department.
 
The cop was actually acting rationally. Consider his position...

He knows killing the dog will not result in his suspension or termination. In fact, doing so is standard practice...

Puppycide | Cop Block

He may need to fill out a form for discharging his firearm, but in California (I think), that procedure is going away.

He knows that killing the dog will not result in a decrease in his salary and benefits. He does not need to please customers.

He knows that killing the dog will place him in good standing with his fellow officers.

He knows that killing the dog may fuel bad feelings toward cops, and make those who support cops question that support. But his actions also convey a clear message to others: "I'm am a police officer. Do what I say, or I will hurt you."

The former is temporary. Most people have been indoctrinated into thinking cops are the good guys (much like feelings toward our military). Hence, bad feelings and questioning of support tend to dissipate.

The latter, essentially fear, is persistent. And that fear usually leads to compliance. That makes the cop's job easier and less risky.

For the cop, the only rational choice is to kill the dog.
 
The cop was actually acting rationally. Consider his position...

He knows killing the dog will not result in his suspension or termination. In fact, doing so is standard practice...

Puppycide | Cop Block

He may need to fill out a form for discharging his firearm, but in California (I think), that procedure is going away.

He knows that killing the dog will not result in a decrease in his salary and benefits. He does not need to please customers.

He knows that killing the dog will place him in good standing with his fellow officers.

He knows that killing the dog may fuel bad feelings toward cops, and make those who support cops question that support. But his actions also convey a clear message to others: "I'm am a police officer. Do what I say, or I will hurt you."

The former is temporary. Most people have been indoctrinated into thinking cops are the good guys (much like feelings toward our military). Hence, bad feelings and questioning of support tend to dissipate.

The latter, essentially fear, is persistent. And that fear usually leads to compliance. That makes the cop's job easier and less risky.

For the cop, the only rational choice is to kill the dog.


See, if I hadn't double-posted, this brilliant post would never have come into existence.

RIP Max.
 
Most people have been indoctrinated into thinking cops are the good guys (much like feelings toward our military).

Remember when the side of a police car read, "To Protect And Serve".

Doesn't say that anymore.
 
Cops killed my cousins dogs when we were kids.... shot them no reason........... cool how the internet is putting an eye in the urban community

crazy part about human psychology

Why does the dog getting shot draw more attention than human mistreatment and false arrest