Diversification is overrated

handrewrites

My Member 8=============3
Oct 24, 2010
1,141
21
0
I'll start off by talking about branding since that seems to be the rage lately:

A brand isn't necessarily future-proof, bulletproof, self-perpetuating or non-depreciating. It's funny how IM'ers overestimate its staying power, but that's probably only because they're comparing it to once-off promotional/income techniques.

There are numerous examples showing just how fragile even large online brands can be, e.g. Myspace and Friendster's social networks.

It doesn't matter whether you bank with branding, direct-response marketing, SE-spam or paid traffic. Each of them requires specialization, constant upkeep and the need to stay ahead of the curve. Each of them are equally difficult and full of headaches if you want to be at the top of the game.

SEO headaches: Matt Cutts and teh Googlez.
Branding headaches: Competition, copycat brand leechers, pigeonholing, etc.
PPC headaches: Don't have any experience with PPC, but I'm aware that it's no walk-in-the-park even when compared to battling Pandas and Penguins (and Zebras and Orca Whales or whatever SEO's will have to deal with in the future).
Email list headaches: Spam complaints, list attrition leading to constantly having to find traffic sources to refill it, monetization, etc.

As you can see none of the above are a panacea to uncertain income. No wait, that's an understatement: THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS RESIDUAL INCOME.

The closest thing to residual income in this world are the taxes collected by the US government, but even that requires enormous, consistent effort including lawmaking, enforcement, maintaining global military/technological superiority so that they can actually enforce stuff, etc.

Nothing is easy, not even collecting taxes. So whatever you want to diversify into, make sure you know what you're getting into (multiplied workload).
 


Branding is not a direct traffic source; apples to oranges. MySpace and Friendster made a few bucks, no? At least your passive income point has some truth to it.

1/3.
 
If i owned myspace and got bought by yahoo for multimillions i wouldnt exactly cry cause its a failed business in the end. Its what stays in the process that matters

If a venture "fails" after 10 years of ride but has left you enough for you and your grandchildren even then its not considered a failure in my humble opinion
 
This is why we can't have nice things.

Back in the day (like 2 weeks ago) your thread was MOVED here because it was enlightened and not because you pressed Start New Thread
 
Not enlightening to already "enlightened" people, but trust me this is gold for noobs.

Branding is not a direct traffic source; apples to oranges.
I never said it was a direct traffic source.
MySpace and Friendster made a few bucks, no? At least your passive income point has some truth to it.

1/3.
Myspace and Friendster? Those were to show that even "giants" fall. The best brands that most WF'ers would manage to create in their lifetimes would bank far less and lose traction much quicker.

If i owned myspace and got bought by yahoo for multimillions i wouldnt exactly cry cause its a failed business in the end. Its what stays in the process that matters

If a venture "fails" after 10 years of ride but has left you enough for you and your grandchildren even then its not considered a failure in my humble opinion
Read above reply.
 
Good idea
 
Residual income = real estate + bonds + stocks and you can expect 5% return per annum, 10% if you're lucky.
 
As you can see none of the above are a panacea to uncertain income. No wait, that's an understatement: THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS RESIDUAL INCOME.

It really just depends on how you define "residual" or "passive." How long does a passive income stream have to last for it to be recognized as such? 6 months? 6 years? 60 years? If it lasts longer than I live, then can I legitimately call it "residual income"?

Yeah, websites need some degree of upkeep. But if you build sites that actually provide value and get good links, you eliminate a lot of the rat race.

I honestly did next to nothing in 2011 as far as work, and I still did alright. Sure, I could have made more money, but I was busy enjoying what is left of my youth. All funded by mythical "residual income."
 
What does the op mean. What does "branding", "residual income" and "diversification" have to do with each other. What the heck is your point? That every method has a potential for problems.
 
wtf nm this was mainly warning post for the masses of noobs who, having lost all their income to the great Penguin, would look to other "income/traffic methods" online totally unprepared for the learning curve.