Had to do a little digging, but I had remembered reading an article that mailchimp posted advocating NOT using social logins. Enjoy.
Social Login Buttons Aren’t Worth It | MailChimp Email Marketing Blog
Is this analysis wrong? Or just biased?
Think of a FB / Google / Twitter registration as somewhere between someone signing up as a regular user, and someone subscribing to your mailing list. Create a new segment of members, and stick them in the middle of those two things.
If they become a full user, then great. If not, it's no skin off your balls.
Is this analysis wrong? Or just biased?
Had to do a little digging, but I had remembered reading an article that mailchimp posted advocating NOT using social logins. Enjoy.
Social Login Buttons Aren’t Worth It | MailChimp Email Marketing Blog
...we place ourselves in a position to feel some of that bad brand juju when the logos of other companies sit next to ours on the most popular page in our app. There’s an implicit affiliation there. Call us control freaks, but we built this brand and we "feel strongly" about shaping its direction ourselves. One logo on our login page is enough. Who the hell wants their app to look like it was designed by NASCAR?