Dofollow Wiki Link Creation with Great Price - 2 Review + 5 Discount Copies
- Thread starter seanlopez
- Start date
- Status
My review time now 
In one sentence, if you want value added SEO service....then he tops the list at wickedfire!
I received the service as advertised. He created 15 wiki links & with unique articles for each(yes, they are unique. Not spun).
After I received the report, 2 wiki pages got deleted. As per my request, he immediately replaced them and bookmarked every single wiki page. That's awesome.
Coming to SERP movement, It is too early to give any conclusion....will come after 10 days & update the result.
Thanks Sean for the quality service you have provided.
In one sentence, if you want value added SEO service....then he tops the list at wickedfire!
I received the service as advertised. He created 15 wiki links & with unique articles for each(yes, they are unique. Not spun).
After I received the report, 2 wiki pages got deleted. As per my request, he immediately replaced them and bookmarked every single wiki page. That's awesome.
Coming to SERP movement, It is too early to give any conclusion....will come after 10 days & update the result.
Thanks Sean for the quality service you have provided.
Articles already in panel and pages will be uploaded later tonight. BTW PM replied
My review time now
In one sentence, if you want value added SEO service....then he tops the list at wickedfire!
I received the service as advertised. He created 15 wiki links & with unique articles for each(yes, they are unique. Not spun).
After I received the report, 2 wiki pages got deleted. As per my request, he immediately replaced them and bookmarked every single wiki page. That's awesome.
Coming to SERP movement, It is too early to give any conclusion....will come after 10 days & update the result.
Thanks Sean for the quality service you have provided.
Thanks for details review Jim, waiting for new orders
REVIEW
I have had quite some mixed feelings about this project, due to several reasons which I am about to explain in this review. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying it's a bad or poor service, simply create your own opinion about it.
This review goes for both, the .EDU and .WIKI creation services which I bought both for the same 2 keywords.
Speed:
Well first of all, my project was ordered and paid 03-16 which can be seen in the .EDU thread. On 04-06 I saw in the Control Panel that the properties have been finally uploaded and created again while on 04-10 the report for social bookmarks was uploaded.
Reason why it took so long can be found under quality, still, definately not according to deadlines, even before the whole accident described in Quality. The original creation was about 2 days late if I remember right.
Communication:
Well this is hard to judge, as normally you receive a response by Sean in a reasonable timeframe of about 24hours but his reply is always like 'yes' or 'no'. For a high-cost product which this aims to be in the end, the communication should be better. Sean is using a Control Panel for uploading reports and 'following the work' - problem is, only time I followed the work was when the final reports were uploaded with the links of the properties in it - other providers do that much better keeping you up to date about the progress, I mean writing articles, posting articles, creating the links and stuff.
Price:
You get what you pay for and people knowing me will confirm I am both ready to invest in SEO and not a fun buyer. Problem is the expectation for this price is normally quite high. The articles in the end are a 100% copyscape pass but look both spun (although I must admit they look very good spun, but this is my personal opinion and I have no proove for them being spun) and written by a non-native English speaker. Some sentences are simply wrong and do not read well and look like spun content and make sense only guessing what they are meant to tell you.
Quality:
Well this is the big point in this whole review. Generally, the quality and idea of this service looks quite good but for a lot of reasons, this service is not a top-service after summarizing all facts in my opinion. It might be I missed the best times of this service as the reviews really rock but that's just my experience reflected about this product.
First of all, in the opening post of both, Sean mentions the content to be a 100% unique and copyscape pass. True about that, problem is that the first time I checked the properties after the report was uploaded, the vast majority of the content was copied word by word from article directories and other topic related sites for at least 50% of the text. By this time, my links were placed in duplicated content. The main problem about this is that whole sentences were copied and not words or structures as this is simply poor. A provider should check this when advertising with 100% unique content.
After mailing Sean about this problem he replied he got cheated by one of his employes who had not done his work well. I understand this can happen but you have to check the work delivered - if you can't handle the workflow this creates get another employe or find a new business.
The second version of the 'newly' written articles which Sean ensured to check on his own for duplicate had the same problem, again parts were word by word copied content and this is what makes me really pissed about this service. By not even checking after the first issue, personally I got the feeling that there are two options: the provider does not care about the quality of his product or the provider is heavily overbooked and receives too much work being the reason for quality dropping - both I don't like. Especially after the first time with the duplicate content issue I think the provider definately should check up the new content delivered to avoid a double missdelivery which was the case here. The third time the content all passed a 100% copyscape finally.
The places the links are created look quite out-of-standard and seem to be really unique - until I started to browse around the sites a little and comparing to other service providers reports. The wiki's Sean uses are used by other providers here as well and therefore are all in all spammed to death already. I am pretty much sure this was a monster package some time ago but with so many footprints in the whole sites and spammed to hell it loses it's power for sure. Beside that, all Wikis had the same username which I hate for footprints - especially as the majority of the wikis use the username in their URL. This footprint becomes even larger noticing that for ALL wikis and edus, 2 images has been used of which one was posted on a image hosting service and the other on a wiki. Problem is, same username and same src=" " tag for the pictures creates HUGE footprints and probably destroy the power of 100% unique content. For the Edus, not all were .edu but a bunch of .edu.xx were included as well but especially the problem about the picture and same username as the wikis gets there too. So in the end, one username used for ALL properties.
With that being said, honestly I haven't seen any movement after delivery of this package although it got into DFB, received some XRumer and Blogcommenting as well. The niches I targeted were tough for sure but without any rankings moving after the package, this was not a positive experience for me. The report I received was still well done and delivered as .pdf.
Finally Sean dropped in 5 extra Wikis for all the problems as sign of saying sorry.
Overall Review:
Well I had quite big expectations for this package of which actually none got satisfied. Finally I received the properties with unique content in it but with the time I wasted by checking up every damn article to find the duplicates (in total I checked three times for each delivery) as I wasn't able to trust the provider after the first delivery and the stress created out of that and the really spammed places the properties are created in, I feel it's somehow wasted about both money and time. You buy expensive packages to avoid wasting time on checking up and getting a quality product with something new on the backlink market - nothing new with this actually as the wikis are overused already. This could be the reason why I haven't seen any movement at all on my keywords except some ranks dropped which I cannot lead back to this package of course.
In the end, honestly I would not recommend this package (neither Wiki nor Edu creation) to anybody. It can be that Sean does a great job in his Link Pyramid or Blogposts services but for Wiki and Edu he failed in my eyes. Too many footprints and too spammy domains used and 2 pictures for a total of 30 properties created is a bad joke combined with the 1 username for the 30 properties. Adding to that I really felt pissed especially after the second delivery of duplicate content and that he did not even bother to check during the second time, overall a no from my side.
I have had quite some mixed feelings about this project, due to several reasons which I am about to explain in this review. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying it's a bad or poor service, simply create your own opinion about it.
This review goes for both, the .EDU and .WIKI creation services which I bought both for the same 2 keywords.
Speed:
Well first of all, my project was ordered and paid 03-16 which can be seen in the .EDU thread. On 04-06 I saw in the Control Panel that the properties have been finally uploaded and created again while on 04-10 the report for social bookmarks was uploaded.
Reason why it took so long can be found under quality, still, definately not according to deadlines, even before the whole accident described in Quality. The original creation was about 2 days late if I remember right.
Communication:
Well this is hard to judge, as normally you receive a response by Sean in a reasonable timeframe of about 24hours but his reply is always like 'yes' or 'no'. For a high-cost product which this aims to be in the end, the communication should be better. Sean is using a Control Panel for uploading reports and 'following the work' - problem is, only time I followed the work was when the final reports were uploaded with the links of the properties in it - other providers do that much better keeping you up to date about the progress, I mean writing articles, posting articles, creating the links and stuff.
Price:
You get what you pay for and people knowing me will confirm I am both ready to invest in SEO and not a fun buyer. Problem is the expectation for this price is normally quite high. The articles in the end are a 100% copyscape pass but look both spun (although I must admit they look very good spun, but this is my personal opinion and I have no proove for them being spun) and written by a non-native English speaker. Some sentences are simply wrong and do not read well and look like spun content and make sense only guessing what they are meant to tell you.
Quality:
Well this is the big point in this whole review. Generally, the quality and idea of this service looks quite good but for a lot of reasons, this service is not a top-service after summarizing all facts in my opinion. It might be I missed the best times of this service as the reviews really rock but that's just my experience reflected about this product.
First of all, in the opening post of both, Sean mentions the content to be a 100% unique and copyscape pass. True about that, problem is that the first time I checked the properties after the report was uploaded, the vast majority of the content was copied word by word from article directories and other topic related sites for at least 50% of the text. By this time, my links were placed in duplicated content. The main problem about this is that whole sentences were copied and not words or structures as this is simply poor. A provider should check this when advertising with 100% unique content.
After mailing Sean about this problem he replied he got cheated by one of his employes who had not done his work well. I understand this can happen but you have to check the work delivered - if you can't handle the workflow this creates get another employe or find a new business.
The second version of the 'newly' written articles which Sean ensured to check on his own for duplicate had the same problem, again parts were word by word copied content and this is what makes me really pissed about this service. By not even checking after the first issue, personally I got the feeling that there are two options: the provider does not care about the quality of his product or the provider is heavily overbooked and receives too much work being the reason for quality dropping - both I don't like. Especially after the first time with the duplicate content issue I think the provider definately should check up the new content delivered to avoid a double missdelivery which was the case here. The third time the content all passed a 100% copyscape finally.
The places the links are created look quite out-of-standard and seem to be really unique - until I started to browse around the sites a little and comparing to other service providers reports. The wiki's Sean uses are used by other providers here as well and therefore are all in all spammed to death already. I am pretty much sure this was a monster package some time ago but with so many footprints in the whole sites and spammed to hell it loses it's power for sure. Beside that, all Wikis had the same username which I hate for footprints - especially as the majority of the wikis use the username in their URL. This footprint becomes even larger noticing that for ALL wikis and edus, 2 images has been used of which one was posted on a image hosting service and the other on a wiki. Problem is, same username and same src=" " tag for the pictures creates HUGE footprints and probably destroy the power of 100% unique content. For the Edus, not all were .edu but a bunch of .edu.xx were included as well but especially the problem about the picture and same username as the wikis gets there too. So in the end, one username used for ALL properties.
With that being said, honestly I haven't seen any movement after delivery of this package although it got into DFB, received some XRumer and Blogcommenting as well. The niches I targeted were tough for sure but without any rankings moving after the package, this was not a positive experience for me. The report I received was still well done and delivered as .pdf.
Finally Sean dropped in 5 extra Wikis for all the problems as sign of saying sorry.
Overall Review:
Well I had quite big expectations for this package of which actually none got satisfied. Finally I received the properties with unique content in it but with the time I wasted by checking up every damn article to find the duplicates (in total I checked three times for each delivery) as I wasn't able to trust the provider after the first delivery and the stress created out of that and the really spammed places the properties are created in, I feel it's somehow wasted about both money and time. You buy expensive packages to avoid wasting time on checking up and getting a quality product with something new on the backlink market - nothing new with this actually as the wikis are overused already. This could be the reason why I haven't seen any movement at all on my keywords except some ranks dropped which I cannot lead back to this package of course.
In the end, honestly I would not recommend this package (neither Wiki nor Edu creation) to anybody. It can be that Sean does a great job in his Link Pyramid or Blogposts services but for Wiki and Edu he failed in my eyes. Too many footprints and too spammy domains used and 2 pictures for a total of 30 properties created is a bad joke combined with the 1 username for the 30 properties. Adding to that I really felt pissed especially after the second delivery of duplicate content and that he did not even bother to check during the second time, overall a no from my side.
Communication-
You are wrong [i always reply you properly. even i told you to use xrumer and i dont think i can suggess you by using just one word "ok"
Reports
If you are accepting i have to mail you every single day about what i am doing on your projects then sorry my mistake. but i always replied if you ask me anything about your project
Quality
You are wrong! i am not using any monster package- search little bit on WF and net i am the first man who offer dofollow wiki service and all others are using my list and footprint
SERP Improvement
Dont know about your site. but i know wiki's are not dead i am still using wiki sites on my monthly SEO and by using wiki i bring plenty of sites on first page / top 5/ top 3 with lot of competitive keywords so dont blame on my service plz. At the same time plz look on your keywords aswell what you are targeting.. give some time to your keywords
Content
Yes i admit i make 2 mistakes on your project, one mistake done by my writer one by me. that why i created 5 extra wiki pages for you.
Anyways thanks for full page review no matter you wrote every single word against me
You are wrong [i always reply you properly. even i told you to use xrumer and i dont think i can suggess you by using just one word "ok"
Reports
If you are accepting i have to mail you every single day about what i am doing on your projects then sorry my mistake. but i always replied if you ask me anything about your project
Quality
You are wrong! i am not using any monster package- search little bit on WF and net i am the first man who offer dofollow wiki service and all others are using my list and footprint
SERP Improvement
Dont know about your site. but i know wiki's are not dead i am still using wiki sites on my monthly SEO and by using wiki i bring plenty of sites on first page / top 5/ top 3 with lot of competitive keywords so dont blame on my service plz. At the same time plz look on your keywords aswell what you are targeting.. give some time to your keywords
Content
Yes i admit i make 2 mistakes on your project, one mistake done by my writer one by me. that why i created 5 extra wiki pages for you.
Anyways thanks for full page review no matter you wrote every single word against me
Well actually your reply does not focus on the problems I explained:
1) The Wikis / EDUs you are using are spammed to hell
2) Did you use the same username for ALL properties ?
3) Did you use only 2 pictures for ALL properties and included them in ALL properties (not uploading each one, only including via HTML from the same source) ?
4) Do you admit that you told me to check each article up after the first duplicate content issue ? If so, did you in fact do this ? If not, why not ?
Did I ask you about XRumer or did you tell me ? I am not telling you to mail me every day, but is it true that although the project was 1 day late already you have not messaged me to tell me you need some more time ?
I am not blaming on your service, I am giving a realistic review. I have had no positive movement, the wikis are spammed to hell, the username and picture thing creates a huge footprint.
This was meant to be positive, Monster package means it was pushing the rankings hard. Beside that, how about the content issue ? How does it come some sentences do not make any sense ? Would be great if you can explain if it's spun or not.
Having out of sudden 45 properties with at least 2 links each with all the same username with all the same pictures inside does not create a footprint and does a good job boosting your page ? Especially this should help if former content was duplicate on that property. Check the sites the properties are created on as they are really really spammed as hell.
****************
In the end, your response does not answer ANY facts I provided in my post and does not reply to it at all. All you do is try to change facts as you don't like somebody posting a realistic review about a service which has not changed anything major since more than one year. Of course the package loses it's power, especially with this pictures and username things included...
1) The Wikis / EDUs you are using are spammed to hell
2) Did you use the same username for ALL properties ?
3) Did you use only 2 pictures for ALL properties and included them in ALL properties (not uploading each one, only including via HTML from the same source) ?
4) Do you admit that you told me to check each article up after the first duplicate content issue ? If so, did you in fact do this ? If not, why not ?
Did I ask you about XRumer or did you tell me ? I am not telling you to mail me every day, but is it true that although the project was 1 day late already you have not messaged me to tell me you need some more time ?
I am not blaming on your service, I am giving a realistic review. I have had no positive movement, the wikis are spammed to hell, the username and picture thing creates a huge footprint.
This was meant to be positive, Monster package means it was pushing the rankings hard. Beside that, how about the content issue ? How does it come some sentences do not make any sense ? Would be great if you can explain if it's spun or not.
Having out of sudden 45 properties with at least 2 links each with all the same username with all the same pictures inside does not create a footprint and does a good job boosting your page ? Especially this should help if former content was duplicate on that property. Check the sites the properties are created on as they are really really spammed as hell.
****************
In the end, your response does not answer ANY facts I provided in my post and does not reply to it at all. All you do is try to change facts as you don't like somebody posting a realistic review about a service which has not changed anything major since more than one year. Of course the package loses it's power, especially with this pictures and username things included...
Man answering the questions in my second post would be much more beneficial for all, both of us same as everybody reading this thread.
You do not answer any single question or any problem I mentioned just refer in very very general, what do you have to hide ?
That you are using the same service since 1 year without any big improvements ?
That you try to sell exclusive wiki lists which in fact are spammed places ?
That you're trying to convince a possible buyer he get's 100% unique written content - but this content in some cases does not make any sense and is written without any logic behind?
That you do not bother to check up after such accidents like the duplicate content ?
Is the content spun or not, awaiting for this an answer. Same as a professional opinion from your side about the issue with usernames and images would be appreciated.
Start answering and stop running away from questions and reviews not prising your product.
I've had a few SEO projects in the past where I could have easily said (if included) the articles were not up to scratch though at the same time its the overall effect thats important in terms of SEO as these articles are generally not written to be "read"
As for communication Ive never had a problem with Sean. Might have to wait a day for a reply, though do always get one
Cant really report on SEO effects yet though I have ordered from Sean in the past, just not this service. This project has about 10 days left to go though will report back with SERP changes in a couple of weeks.
Silver
As for communication Ive never had a problem with Sean. Might have to wait a day for a reply, though do always get one
Cant really report on SEO effects yet though I have ordered from Sean in the past, just not this service. This project has about 10 days left to go though will report back with SERP changes in a couple of weeks.
Silver
- Status