review
your original post, had great English and shows understanding of the language as well as grammar and vocab that could lead a reader to believe you were a native english speaker
i would give your original post a 9/10
The articles you wrote, whilst good, gave away small signs that they were written by someone who was not a native English speaker. When I recieved the articles, I was not sure if it was you who had sent them. In fact, my first thought was that you had out-sourced this to someone else.
Whilst still good and usable as is (without edits), i would rate the articles 7/10
Good but not the standard i was lead to expect from your original post
Overall, I would use again as the articles were still good and i'm sure he will be continually improving as he takes more orders. His communication is great and he accepts feedback with good grace.
your original post, had great English and shows understanding of the language as well as grammar and vocab that could lead a reader to believe you were a native english speaker
i would give your original post a 9/10
The articles you wrote, whilst good, gave away small signs that they were written by someone who was not a native English speaker. When I recieved the articles, I was not sure if it was you who had sent them. In fact, my first thought was that you had out-sourced this to someone else.
Whilst still good and usable as is (without edits), i would rate the articles 7/10
Good but not the standard i was lead to expect from your original post
Overall, I would use again as the articles were still good and i'm sure he will be continually improving as he takes more orders. His communication is great and he accepts feedback with good grace.
