Google’s metagame

emp

New member
Jun 29, 2006
7,465
211
0
:alert: :alert: :alert: :alert: :alert: :alert: :alert: :alert: :alert:
Disclaimer: This is one of my articles on metagaming on the blind ape seo.
I am posting this here simply to get this out in front of you guys and grab some more input.
:alert: :alert: :alert: :alert: :alert: :alert: :alert: :alert: :alert:

“Satan’s biggest trick was to make the world believe he doesn’t exist.”

Laying the foundation - Send people away

Search engines are curious beasts. The success of a search engine does not lie in keeping the visitor on its pages as long as possible. To the contrary, the best search engine sends me on my way happily, because I found that elusive result at once, and not by clicking through ten result pages first.

So the faster people went away from Google, the more it grew in popularity.

So far, so good - and nothing new in search engine land.

The only remarkable thing here would be the amount of time that Google kept this up. In the year 2000 - after a full four years, first keywords were being sold.

It took another three years for Adsense to appear on the scene in 2003 - Seven years after Google launched.

At this time, people were already loyal to the Google search engine.

Starting the main game - Nothing to see here

While Google’s main game - advertising - was nothing new, they still managed to introduce it with elegance and subtlety.

The pure text ads were a welcome change to the garish animated gifs and did not disturb users of the site. Blending the ads with the rest of the SERP layout quietly and unobstrusively was genius.

Although some (not all) usability experts had held the conviction that animated ads were sub-par in performance, Google was one of the first companies to ditch them (later reincluded).

The main game - Expanding your reach, sneakily

With the introduction of Adsense for small publishers, Google opened up a trusted source for unobtrusive ads for any webmaster.

At this point, many webmasters were used to Google being the main driver of their traffic. Including Google ads into their sites was a no-brainer.

Behind the scenes, Google aquired more and more companies…

The end game - send them away, but keep them on your offerings anyway

Starting from a query (almost any query) , you will either land directly on something owned by Google (youtube, anyone?) or on a site featuring Google Ads.

Like a metastasizing tumor, Google managed to infuse their adspace all over the web.

At the same time, more and more queries are being built into dynamic content driven SERPS.

An example?

Take this query: [stock price google]

And the very first result (after a bought out spot) is Google’s finance site.

And - giving credit where it is due - that result is great! And google is expanding on these types of results, tying people into the search engine in a glorious reversal of the typical search engine strategy.

Leaving Google? Welcome to Google.
 


It is because of this that I have gotten out of the SEO information game. If you provide information (unless it is for shaddy things google can't touch without blow back), then you are on google's target list.

But, if you are in something other than information/digital offerings, you are good, since google does not deal in non-information/digital products/services.
 
Satans biggest trick was the invention of religion.

It puts the form of believe over the believe itself.

Which is an interesting trick when it comes to SEO, if you think about it.
 
Yep, agree with this... Aaron Wall has been writing about this angle too for a while:


Google Eats Their Organic Search Results | SEO Book.com

It's really just a form of vertical integration strategy. Similar to how Tesco over here started buying meat directly from farmers, then eventually just started paying farmers to look after pigs for them. Now they run the whole supply chain. Google is a gateway, just as a large retailer is a gateway. Deeper ownership of the supply chain = more revenue opportunities.