How I Lost $4,600 through COPEAC
- Thread starter Robert827
- Start date
Um...ya...I'm sure if they hadn't caught his crooked ass, he would of course have promptly contacted them and said "Sorry guys, I "accidentally" iFramed this offer blatantly against T&Cs for 48 hours, please don't pay me for that time period, I wouldn't feel honest accepting it"
/sarcasm
There were no T&Cs originally, which was another point if you read the original post. It would have been another story entirely had the terms been outlined from the beginning, but that wasn't the case.
What's your point? They are overlooking the fact that the traffic actually backed out?
Stop trying so hard.
There's no point!
OP used the iFrame, it doesn't matter if it was a mistake or intentional, he got caught in the act and is now being penalized for that, I don't see anything unfair here!
It's Cheryl Cole, so it was probably taken from X-Factor or an interview. Not sure if she's famous in USA or not.
This is fucking rediculous, I'm on the OP side. He just got ass raped by a network owner and advertiser who didn't even bother to put up terms on their own damn offer? How hard is it to put some restrictions in the description section?
We now need to add terms that say if you scam this offer you wont be paid? lol thats a joke i hope.
Dude, he was sending fraudulent leads. You don't have to put this in the TOS of every offer. It's common sense. Just like don't stick your cock in 12 year old girls. You don't see that plastered on the gates of every school. But you know its wrong.
Its likely the advertiser saw a landing page with some bird with her muff out sending traffic to their EDU offer and thought, hang on a sec, fuck this guy.
What is off about this is the advetiser should pay for any leads that did back out before the switch in landers was made. This quite frankly is NOT FUCKING ON COPEAC.
What about the 3 weeks of legit leads he sent? Breaking the terms for 48h justifies to scrub all the leads? I'd expect my AM and network to be accommodating in cases like that.
I don't know the details and maybe the OP was sending fraudulent traffic for the whole 3 weeks. Still I don't like how everybody starts bashing the OP just because the forum owner and the network owner put him down. Beside mkrongel and the OP nowbody knows the details.
So basically what you're saying is.. Hey, I just tried to steal a bit from you. Can we finish the legit business plx?
...and it makes perfect sense to you?
...and it makes perfect sense to you?
this could not happen to a bigger fuck wit... ppl like wobels here deserve to get banned... infact can we block his ip due to his dumb ass move?
Except he wasn't sending fraudulent leads guy - The landing page was the typical car insurance one "27 YO MALE INSURANCE" except it was for iPads "COLLEGE STUDENTS GET IPADS"
Like I said before, iFraming was apparently against the terms (even thought it wasn't stated) and I know that. But to have 3 weeks of legit, direct linked FB traffic scrubbed is complete bullshit
I do and that's why I'm backing this up. Like I said OP was my referral to the network and he is my friend. I have worked with COPEAC for 3+ years and never had an issue with traffic quality.
Like Mike told me though, case is closed, I just don't like how everyone assumes the iframe was for porn or some other bullshit leads.
If he was trying to steal that would be a different story.
So somebody running an auto insurance offer with it framed and having "19 YO Female $12/mo AUTO INSURANCE" is stealing?
The only "oops" is he got caught now he wants to cry about it. It sure sounds to me like the OP knew exactly what he was doing.
