Most networks take between 10-30% legitimately. Then depending on the network how much they shave you is a whole different discussion.
Actually webwonder, it doesnt matter how much the networks pay you. You will fail anyway, and that is because you are thinking wrong.
What matters is network transparency, payout flexibility, cashflow, conversion rates. Not payouts.
I currently work with a small network, with the smallest payout of all similar offers, and I think I am the one out of two affiliates promoting their offers. Conversion rates are insane, and I am making 3 paychecks.
All that because I look at the right metrics.
Some of the networks (who I won't mention by name), will go beneath the 10% threshold just to have the best payout and pull volume from competing networks if the merchant hasn't set a maximum street price on the offer.
Pretty sure Hydra does this with a lot of the offers it has comparing the same offer to other networks.
A shitload, I found that a couple offers I'm running on CX are being run off XY7.
So...
XY7 takes a cut + CX digital takes a cut + some shaving = A LOT!
Can we stop using the word transparency? The word itself has been dirtied by pepperjam, and I'd hate for it's use to increase and give legitimacy to their "only benefits the merchants" bullshit version of it.Actually webwonder, it doesnt matter how much the networks pay you. You will fail anyway, and that is because you are thinking wrong.
What matters is network transparency, payout flexibility, cashflow, conversion rates. Not payouts.
I currently work with a small network, with the smallest payout of all similar offers, and I think I am the one out of two affiliates promoting their offers. Conversion rates are insane, and I am making 3 paychecks.
All that because I look at the right metrics.
Huge is a understatement sometimes...One thing to consider....
We also as affiliates don't have to go deal with advertisers which can be a HUGE pain in the ass. Is that worth a small %?
One thing to consider....
What do you think should happen if the advertiser doesn't pay? Do you think the network should try and cover what's owed? If so where does that money come from? If someone came to that was doing good volume and said I'm ok to take the terms that advertisers are giving, lets say monthly payments 15 days after the end of the month. And if the advertiser doesn't pay I'm not going to bother you about it. I may give them a better payout. But I've had a couple advertisers not pay and always never really said anything when covering the funds to the affiliate.
So yeah, we as affiliates may be giving up a little chunk but we get weekly payments, probably are getting paid on advertisers that don't pay. We also as affiliates don't have to go deal with advertisers which can be a HUGE pain in the ass. Is that worth a small %?
As an affiliate I've always chosen to work through a network other then a couple cases. As it always let me focus on what's important, figuring out how to get more traffic for more offers to make more money![]()
There's nothing I'd love to do more than share some of this info. The only thing that sucks more than a merchant that doesn't pay us is seeing that merchant continuing to "succeed" by going to get traffic from other networks.This is a good point
Jason we should share info on who pays and who doesnt. Half this industry pays very slow and sometimes not at all.