I have to get off of seo-host.com, where should I go?

[subigo]

You have a cash site, to support it you make a network of say 100 or 200 sites that will all link to the cash site for various keywords. Are you saying it's okay to put these 200 sites on the same IP address with the same nameservers and they will still have the same affect as though those domains were on separate IP addresses and nameservers?

First, if you're spending money for 200 IPs to simply get some keyword links back to your cash site, you're doing it wrong. Second, if you *did* do that, it would depend on the sites and their content. Chances are these sites don't have any "link juice" anyway, so it's not going to matter one way or the other. Google doesn't care if 200 sites on the same IP link to you or not. Google cares about the voting power of the site linking to you. Too many people think they can make some shitty wordpress blog network of 200 sites, hide them behind different IPs, spin a few ripped articles, and then suddenly have a super magic linking network that will send you to the top of the search results for any keyword. It's retarded.

Or are you saying if you have 15 different cash sites that are unrelated to one another, all on the same IP address, it won't have an affect on their ranking probability?

Obviously this is true. Otherwise the concept of shared hosting would be pretty much dead.

 

[Fellah]

First, if you're spending money for 200 IPs to simply get some keyword links back to your cash site, you're doing it wrong.

I disagree.

Second, if you *did* do that, it would depend on the sites and their content.
Chances are these sites don't have any "link juice" anyway, so it's not going to matter one way or the other. Google doesn't care if 200 sites on the same IP link to you or not. Google cares about the voting power of the site linking to you. Too many people think they can make some shitty wordpress blog network of 200 sites, hide them behind different IPs, spin a few ripped articles, and then suddenly have a super magic linking network that will send you to the top of the search results for any keyword. It's retarded.

Right, but chances are if you're investing 2k in domains and $750/month in seo hosting, you're also going to invest in hiring two people at $400/month each to setup the sites with free templates and unique content and then spin that unique content and submit it to web 2.0 properties and then use DFB to backlink those web 2.0 properties so that you now have 200 unique sites that can put you over the top of your competition in your competitive niche.

Obviously this is true. Otherwise the concept of shared hosting would be pretty much dead.

I agree.

 

[HostingCoupon]

SEO Hosting - SEO Web Hosting with cPanel and Multiple Class C IP Addresses FOR SURE

 

[JTP50]

hostnine(dot)com is a great alternative and inexpensive to boot.

 

[casinobonus24]

It would be absolutely retarded to set up an entire network on an ip.

Actually this would be a great way to set the flags for Google to check a site for it being legit or not, I absolutely agree that running whole networks on the same IP is really bullshit. No better way to get a huge footprint for your money site.

 

[Berto]

Exactly. Anyone else want to prove me wrong?

So why is Bofu's new service kicking so much ass then? Tiering lots of different C class links works from everything I've seen. Not a case study, just more evidence that I don't want all of my micro sites pointing to my "macro site" to be on the same IP.

 

[medway]

Avoid HostSeo.org as well unless you like seeing server 500 errors on simple things like doing wp upgdates. Good support at least but nitemare to operate on.

 

[clyde]

Take it from a guy who's hosted 2,400 domains.

Use SEO Hosting - SEO Web Hosting with Multiple C-Class IP Packages

 

[Jingo]

I use indianets and webhostingplex. Both have US Ips.
Excellent uptimes and customer service.