[LINK ANNIHILATION] V2 - EDU|WIKI|WEB2.0|MOODLE|ARTICLE DIR|LSI CONTENT|MORE - $85

Status
Not open for further replies.
$$DerekDavis$$

$$DerekDavis$$

Banned
Oct 25, 2011
146
0
0
Rating - 91.7%
11   1   0
V2 - SEE V1 WITH REVIEWS HERE >> VERSION 1 THREAD

You Heard it right. The most complete SEO package out there, with the most COMPETITIVE price.

All MANUAL. NO BOTS. NO SOFTWARE. 100% MANUAL.

We've been testing this for several weeks now, and we've finally put together a comprehensive, all-in-one SEO package. Let's cut to the chase, since we only got 10 days before our next payment!

1. We have 20 link builders working in our team
2. We've been doing local seo for clients for several years, and have been using this for our local seo clients with great results
3. We've tested this in 5 different niches (non local seo) with positive results

THE PACKAGES (NO TWO PACKAGES WILL EVER HAVE THE EXACT SAME LINKS):

LINK DESTRUCTION:

1 1,000w LSI Article w/ proper header tags, proper link placement + 30 LSI keywords in every article - HANDSPUN FOR UNIQUENESS + READABILITY

25 Live Article Directory links (using article spun)
3 kws/urls

10 web 2.0 properties (using article spun + pictures + niche video)
3 kws/urls

5 Doc sharing (using article spun + pictures)
3 kws/urls

10 Wiki articles (using article spun)
3 kws/urls

25 EDU Profile links
1 kw/url but CAN ROTATE AND WILL ADD ADDITIONAL KW/URL WHERE POSSIBLE.

10 Moodle Articles (using article spun)
3 kws/urls

25 High PR profile links
1 kw/url but CAN ROTATE AND WILL ADD ADDITIONAL KW/URL WHERE POSSIBLE.

7 Types of links

$85.00 = .37 cent per link, MANUAL.

Turnaround time: 6 days

LINK ANNIHILATION

2 1,000w LSI Article w/ proper header tags, proper link placement + 30 LSI keywords in every article - HANDSPUN FOR UNIQUENESS + READABILITY

50 Live Article Directory links (using article spun)
3 kws/urls

20 web 2.0 properties (using article spun + pictures + niche video)
3 kws/urls

10 Doc sharing (using article spun + pictures)
3 kws/urls

20 Wiki articles (using article spun)
3 kws/urls

50 EDU Profile links
1 kw/url but CAN ROTATE AND WILL ADD ADDITIONAL KW/URL WHERE POSSIBLE.

25 Moodle Articles (using article spun)
3 kws/urls

50 High PR profile links
1 kw/url but CAN ROTATE AND WILL ADD ADDITIONAL KW/URL WHERE POSSIBLE.

7 Types of links

$150.00 = .31 cent per link, MANUAL.

Turnaround time: 7 days

FULL EXCEL REPORT FOR ALL LINKS. ALL LINKS WILL BE SUBMITTED TO LINDEXED.COM.



Frequently Asked Questions:

Q: WHOA THERE! You're new here. Where's the review copies?

A: We gave out a TON of review copies in our last thread, located here.

Q: And discounted copies?

A: Tough crowd! 3 Discounted Review copies will be given to reputed members as well at 20% off! ***IF YOU'RE NOT GOING TO LEAVE A REVIEW - DON'T BOTHER ASKING FOR A REVIEW COPY.***

Q: How many keywords/urls can we use?

A: We suggest up to 3 keywords and 3 urls, but since we're doing this manually, we can take up to 5 keywords and 5 urls, and spin them during submission.

Q: Bulk order discounts?

A: Contact me at seoderekdavis@gmail.com for more information. Depends on quantity.

Q: How do you handle link replacement?

A: We replace down links up to 2 weeks - of course free of charge.

Q: How do you get your LSI Keywords?

A: We have an in-house tool that we use to write your content. We scour the top 20 results for your keywords to create your LSI content.

Q: What niches will you not accept?

A: We don't accept the usual porn, gambling, pharm, etc. If you have a question about it, just send us an email at seoderekdavis@gmail.com.
 


REVIEWS:

gump87 said:
Review:

Speed: 5 out of 5. Turnaround time was stated as 7 days, but I got the report sooner. That is always a plus.

Communication: 5 out of 5. Quick responses once he was able to PM. Report was easy to read except for one page that was super tiny, but I just magnified it.

Price: 4.0 out of 5. I got a review copy, but the actual price is reasonable. For the price you should expect a little more attention to detail that I will explain more about in the quality section.

Quality: 4.0 out of 5. Not all profiles were linked properly and there was no over-delivery so I ended up being short profiles, which I don't mind that much because they are just profiles. The package lacked the "overall manual touch" that I was looking for as all profiles had the same username which makes it seem more automatic than manual. Articles used for Web 2.0s, wikis, etc. were obviously spun and didn't make sense in certain areas, but were readable and not complete gibberish. It's not great spinning, but nowhere near the worst. Links were placed properly in articles. I was only given 5 doc sharing on the report, which was a negative for me. I'm sure it was just a simple mistake and the OP will correct this. The bottom line here is that I got results. Keyword one went from 9 to 8 and keyword two went from 8 to 4.

Overall Review: 4.5 out of 5. Great service in terms of results. I would recommend more of a manual touch though.
Click to expand...

flx89 said:
REVIEW

I will start by sharing the serp movement

Initial rankings:

kw 1: 4
kw 2: 4
kw 3: 3
kw 4: 1

Current rankings:

kw 1: 3 (+1)
kw 2: 5 (-1)
kw 3: 1 (+2)
kw 4: 2 (-1)


So, just received my report, so i guess the rankings will be dancing for a while.

Speed: The OP delivered the report in 7 business days, so 5/5

Communication: Very well, he answered and followed every instructions. 5/5

Price: For the amount of work, the price it's good.5/5

Quality: The quality it's good. A few profiles were not working properly, but that's a very small problem. You get exact link of everything, profiles, article directories, wiki, web, etc. You Also get the username and password, if you want to edit something. 4.5/5

Overall review: I would rate this service 4.5 out of 5, and would recommend
Click to expand...

atinmich said:
I received my report for the Link Destruction Package.

Communication: 5/5
I provided some instructions regarding how I wanted some parts of this packaged processed and the OP delivered on those instructions. Along the way, the OP kept me apprised via email as to the status. A 1000 word LSI article was provided. I asked to review the article first, which the OP let me do. There were only minor errors in the article that I corrected. Probably for this type of package, it's not critical but I would rather start off with a solid article that addresses a niche properly prior to creating spun versions.

Report: 5/5
OP delivered a report that is tabbed breaking each deliverable down into a section for easy review.

Profile links:
30 were provided in this package. These are the typical profile links spread about a diverse set of forums. Some allow a keyword anchor text link while others are less effective with a www button linking to your page. The page PR for many of the forums varies with one being a PR7. Unfortunately, anchor text link is not present for this profile but a plain text link is (non clickable). I don't know if that is temporary or not. User name and password is provided to add content to the forums.

EDU Profiles.
I like an assortment of keywords were used. OP provided several different PRs with the highest being a 5. Typical forum sign ups. User name and password provided so content could be added.

Moodle Page links on EDU sites.
10 links were provided here, however, three were page not found so they may have been deleted by the admin. I spot check these and found my spun articles that the OP provided. An image was also provided with the article which was a nice touch. PRs were 1 through 4 for these links, with one PR5.

Article Directories
25 submissions were done into various article directories. I have not heard of most of these sites, however, some are placed on .org sites. The OP used some images in these articles. I would recommend providing images if you have any brandable product/service so that another company's product isn't inadvertently shown in the article.

5 Document Sharing Sites
A spun article with image was provided for each submission. Again, I would caution what images are used and suggest the OP only uses the images you provide unless they are truly generic images.

WikiLinks and Web 2.0 properties
Spun articles provided on multiple sites. Articles read fairly well and an image is included to dress it up a bit.

Overall Value: 4/5
There is a lot of effort put into this package by the OP. All the work was performed as described. Is this package worth it? I ordered this to maintain existing rankings for my keywords and for overall link diversity which I believe this package definitely provided. Can't judge the overall SEO value at this point as this package was just completed. I provided a 4/5 because of the images included. For my market, it is something that matters. For more generic niches you wouldn't have a problem.
Click to expand...


zingo said:
Received review:

Link reports are in .xls and easy to follow.

Articles are readable (good enough) , and each property site that allow pics has then and look nice and neat.

The profile links are all accounted for some do not have anchors and are http:// .... but that is good mixes things up a bit.

The Moodle pages looked good but had <h1> code in the actual article not that is make a difference but just looks off a little bit, all links accounted for.

EDU Profiles - Links all accounted for look good.

Article Dirs - All accounted for look good

Doc Sharing - All accounted for look good

Wiki Sites - All accounted for look good

Overall I give this pack "good" rating, if your looking to diversify your back-link profile a bit this would help. I cannot comment on SERP improvements, I blasted this sites with some heavy blog posts a week or so ago so hard to tell what is going on.
Click to expand...

twister55 said:
Review

Quality: 4.5/5 - Received everything in a nice package with additional links just in case some links are deleted. Impressed by the simple organization. The only reason quality doesn't get a perfect 5 is because the spun articles are slightly difficult to read.

Communication: 5/5 - I made a spelling mistake in one of the keywords and alerted the seller. The seller immediately emailed me back to let me know it was changed. Great stuff.

I can't wait to see the effects in the SERPs.
Click to expand...
 
SeoFuel said:
Have trouble giving a new person with 26 posts $70 to review your service for you
Click to expand...

We already have reviews from our other thread - this is our second thread :) No more review copies are available.

We are also waiting on reviews from finished packages as well.
 
*****ATTENTION*****​

Someone paypal'd us about 400.00. I'm guessing it was for a bulk order, but we haven't received any email about it, nor any pms.

We could just take this payment as a BIG OL' THANK YOU for being full of awesomeness, but we rather find the owner and process the orders :)

If this is you (we have a name on the receipt) please email us!
 
!

RangerEsq said:
I will take a 20% review copy for the $150 package. PM me your paypal email.
Click to expand...

PM'd You!

Due to my mistake in posting it in the new thread title (because i'm a doofus sometimes) I'm giving rangerESQ a 20% off review copy....

AND ONE OTHER PERSON!

IF you're not going to leave a review, don't get the discounted copy. Reviews are much more important now due to the 10 day thread change.

If you want the 20% off, PM ME!
 
Just got my first report and was very happy all links are up and running no 404 pages and package was delivered as promise. Just ordered another 1
 
$$DerekDavis$$ said:
*****ATTENTION*****​

Someone paypal'd us about 400.00. I'm guessing it was for a bulk order, but we haven't received any email about it, nor any pms.

We could just take this payment as a BIG OL' THANK YOU for being full of awesomeness, but we rather find the owner and process the orders :)

If this is you (we have a name on the receipt) please email us!
Click to expand...

Found him! :)
 
Transaction ID for this payment is: 8Y572739X1013291L.
I have just ordered Link Destruction
 
Ordered 11/7/11, received 11/14/11. Reporting today 11/16/11

Serp was:
Position 11, 9 and 9
Position is now 43, 10 and 11

IDK if this package caused that or not. When going through the report, I found several broken links (example; www.google.com/page-keyword. html) ---((THAT SPACE IN THE . THEN HTML). So I'm sure those wouldnt classify as a link. Anyhow, I wouldnt do it again but im sure it may be useful to some. itrader left.
 
Dresden14 said:
Ordered 11/7/11, received 11/14/11. Reporting today 11/16/11

Serp was:
Position 11, 9 and 9
Position is now 43, 10 and 11

IDK if this package caused that or not. When going through the report, I found several broken links (example; www.google.com/page-keyword. html) ---((THAT SPACE IN THE . THEN HTML). So I'm sure those wouldnt classify as a link. Anyhow, I wouldnt do it again but im sure it may be useful to some. itrader left.
Click to expand...

Thank you for your honest review! We had actually seen this minor drop as we started building your links (If i remember correctly, we were 3-4 web 2.0 properties into your package). Nevertheless, we will continue to monitor these results, and will look through your report to make sure any broken links are fixed. Please do keep us updated within the serps!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom