Link Farm with Same Host?

DinoVedo

Banned
May 26, 2010
136
0
0
East Lansing, MI
www.dinovedo.com
How do you guys do it or recommend?

Will Google give the same amount of value from links pointing to the same host IP C class number or not? And if not, how do you guys go about purchasing all these different hosting accounts and organizing them properly?

Any options??
 


Link farming with the same IP is useless. There are several ways to really go about doing this. The easiest would be to purchase several domains, and put them on different hosting companies throughout the world.

If you really want to run a proper link farm, don't know why, but you cannot have the interlinking on the same IP C class.

Also, mask our whois information. Remember Google is a registrar now, so they see everything.

Also, no freaking footprints. That means, don't use the Googel Adsense across your whole network, or do something like have 1 Google Analytics account for all your domains to check traffic. Don't link your google analytics accounts, NEVER login to your different Google Analytics account from the same IP. Safe bet on staying under the radar is don't use any google products on any of your domains.

No foot prints. interlink in an open linkwheel motion, Meaning, all sites link to another, but at the end, don't link to the first site. All sites have to be on different hostings, and different IP Class.

Use web 2.0 properties to boost your web sites as well. If you play it safe, you'll have yourself a notice solid, almost undetectable link farm. Again, I don't even know why you want a link farm, but that's what I recommend when attempting this.
 
Well i heard you could get really good SEO benefits from doing something like this but now that you explained it I'm not sure if its worth to do all that.

I mean won't the sites I create be PR 0 anyways so I'm better off just getting links through xrum or scrpebox??
 
You can buy seo hosting and get something like 150 different c-class ip's with your dedicated server or VPS, but it will cost you.

The money would probably be better spent on outsourcing xrumer blasts / 2.0 properties / directory submissions etc.

Back in the day, everyone was doing this, but google is FAR more equipped to pick up link farms like these nowadays and it would take you a lot of time to make sure you dont leave any footprints, as mentioned above. If you succeed in creating a massive link farm it would definately be usefull, but its just not that easy nowadays.
 
A combination of a VPS/Dedi with a *couple* class-c IPs and outsourcing to other services would be a more or less balanced combination.

This would be correct.

To do it right, and with long tail you simply need to put in the time to do it the correct way. There is more to it then just grabbing some C-Classes and throwing up some sites. But that is a start.

Ideally, you really have to decide if it's worth the time to do it right. If you have questions on SEO Hosting, feel free to contact me. If you want simply linking strategy, contact SEO Melon (icq#: 473236446).
 
I thought I`d add my question to this thread rather than starting a new one. I have seohosting with 5 c-class ip addresses, and on each c-class I have one mini-site linking back to a site on my hostgator shared hosting. Then I build web 2.0 properties linking to those 5 minisites.

So my question is, if I made another network of 5 new minisites on those same 5 c-class IPs, linking to a different site for a different niche on my hostgator hosting, will the 2 networks having the same IP addresses be detected as a footprint?

I imagine it would be, but you guys are saying just a couple c-classes is enough. Do you mean a couple c-classes for each network? I`m not sure if my question is clear or not. I want to build multiple networks on the same few c-class ip`s but want to know if that`s a bad idea.
 
I thought I`d add my question to this thread rather than starting a new one. I have seohosting with 5 c-class ip addresses, and on each c-class I have one mini-site linking back to a site on my hostgator shared hosting. Then I build web 2.0 properties linking to those 5 minisites.

So my question is, if I made another network of 5 new minisites on those same 5 c-class IPs, linking to a different site for a different niche on my hostgator hosting, will the 2 networks having the same IP addresses be detected as a footprint?

I imagine it would be, but you guys are saying just a couple c-classes is enough. Do you mean a couple c-classes for each network? I`m not sure if my question is clear or not. I want to build multiple networks on the same few c-class ip`s but want to know if that`s a bad idea.

There is a lot more that goes into SEO Hosting and gaming the algo than 'just another c-class'.

Class-C's are only part of the equation.
:food-smiley-010:
 
I thought I`d add my question to this thread rather than starting a new one. I have seohosting with 5 c-class ip addresses, and on each c-class I have one mini-site linking back to a site on my hostgator shared hosting. Then I build web 2.0 properties linking to those 5 minisites.

So my question is, if I made another network of 5 new minisites on those same 5 c-class IPs, linking to a different site for a different niche on my hostgator hosting, will the 2 networks having the same IP addresses be detected as a footprint?

I imagine it would be, but you guys are saying just a couple c-classes is enough. Do you mean a couple c-classes for each network? I`m not sure if my question is clear or not. I want to build multiple networks on the same few c-class ip`s but want to know if that`s a bad idea.

I wouldn't mind knowing the answer to this too as it is something I am thinking of doing using barefootsies seo hosting. So taking an example

Health niche - 5 mini sites (on 5 c-class IPs) linking to a health money site (on a server in a different country)

Finance niche - 5 mini sites (on same 5 c-class IPs as health mini sites above) linking to a finance money site (on same host as the health money site)

The health and finance networks DON'T interlink anywhere. Is the fact the two networks are using the same IPs likely to be found as a footprint and penalised by the search engines?