linklicious or backlinksindexer - What's Your Choice?

Linklicious Or baclinksindexer?

  • Linklicious

    Votes: 4 66.7%
  • baclinksindexer

    Votes: 2 33.3%

  • Total voters
    6

dreamboy101

New member
Jun 15, 2011
4
0
0
Hi,

Would love to hear from the pros here about what they use to index the backlinks built by xrumer/scrapebox?

And what are the pros and cons of using them?

thanks and I appreciate,

-dreamboy101
 


I used baclink energizer and linklicious. They have different working style. I like Linklicious more. Worked well for me.
 
linklicious wont index much, its purpose is to get your links crawled not indexed.
There is a lot of controversy on crawling vs indexing of profile links, if you search around on forums you will find more info.

With that said, linklicious is great for what it does but leaves a big footprint, its only 15 a month so you should probably try it out for yourself.
 
i chose neither one.

linkalicious caught some heat reusing peoples link for a new service of their own. Also, massive damn footprint. Also, didnt see much results from it myself.

Hadn't used the other service.

Wanna know what i fucking do? I grab my links I want spidered and I throw in a bunch of other links not mine into 1 txt file. I shuffle that shit up real good.

I then take the content of that file and submit them to pingfarm at like 9am. I then submit the same contents again to pingdevice at like noon. I then take the content and put them into MegaPinger ( sold here at WF ) at like 5pm. I do this for 3 days straight.

I have this all automated, so its not an issue. I have never had a problem with getting my links counted/indexed/spidered/make my sites dance
 
i chose neither one.

linkalicious caught some heat reusing peoples link for a new service of their own. Also, massive damn footprint. Also, didnt see much results from it myself.

Hadn't used the other service.

Wanna know what i fucking do? I grab my links I want spidered and I throw in a bunch of other links not mine into 1 txt file. I shuffle that shit up real good.

I then take the content of that file and submit them to pingfarm at like 9am. I then submit the same contents again to pingdevice at like noon. I then take the content and put them into MegaPinger ( sold here at WF ) at like 5pm. I do this for 3 days straight.

I have this all automated, so its not an issue. I have never had a problem with getting my links counted/indexed/spidered/make my sites dance

+1

The better question you should be asking yourself is: why are you [OPer] trying to get them indexed as soon as you make them?

Depending on how developed your skills are at making those profiles/posts/pages you made with Xrumer, Scrapebox, SEnuke, etc. you will get varying amounts of them that stay for more than a day, let alone a month.

Now, if you're Google and keeping tabs on all the alive links for 90-180 days and notice a pattern of what you're making, then pinging, then what do you think they are going to be doing with your site? Oh, they'll be looking at it, but not in the positive light you want.

I wouldn't ping any links that aren't still around after a couple of weeks. Chances are they'll be the ones that last 90% of the time and you'll have a much smaller footprint.
 
linklicious wont index much, its purpose is to get your links crawled not indexed.
There is a lot of controversy on crawling vs indexing of profile links, if you search around on forums you will find more info.

With that said, linklicious is great for what it does but leaves a big footprint, its only 15 a month so you should probably try it out for yourself.


It depends on your goals really. Indexing is a metric of your backlink strength, but it doesn't have any direct bearing on your rankings. (Just like a PRNA can outrank a PR 5) But (obviously) if your links don't get crawled your SERPs can't improve. We sent out a case study back in February showing a throwaway site of ours that had 12 or 15 terms in the first 2 pages with zero indexed links.

As for the footprint, we do have an option in the Pro where you can use your own domain/subdomain for the RSS feed hosting. Then there is no more footprint than any other blog. (I personally use the default settings including shortening URL for our own clients)