Thank you for your review styledoesmatter
Still have 1 review copy left at $30!
*Bump 1/2
LinkNinja: Permanent High Quality Pagerank 5 Blogposts - Review copies
- Thread starter Izaya
- Start date
- Status
Thank you for your review styledoesmatter
Still have 1 review copy left at $30!
*Bump 1/2
i got a review copy, received my report yesterday and here i am. if you've read any of my other reviews, you know i don't say nice things just because i get a freebie or a discount.
speed 5/5: took a day or two, sadly can't remember now, but it was definitely on the quick side when it comes to writing a quality original post.
communication 5/5: didn't need any, which is good - we outsource because we're time-poor, having to spend any more time than you absolutely have to reduces the value of that. i'm sure communication would have been just fine if i had needed it.
quality 5/5: backlink profile looks fine and supports the pr value; i've seen more solid ones on pr5s (more recognizable authorities linking in, eg .govs and .edus linking to a defunct charity, say), but at considerably higher pricepoints and quite rarely. this kind of profile is also considerably more likely to stick in the long term. a lot of previous posts have pr4, so i'm confident i'm getting plenty of juice and it demonstrates that the site made it through the last pr update intact.
the post was excellent. the writing was very good and he even managed to use an unnatural anchor in a sentence (not going to out, obviously, but think 'keyword keyword city' where people would normally say 'keyword keyword in city' or 'city keyword keyword'), which i wasn't expecting.
the quality is actually consistent throughout the blog. all the posts are written in a style that makes it as difficult as possible to definitively determine that these are seo posts (not going to say exactly what that is because it's a competitive advantage for a provider). obviously, there's a limit to how far you can get with that, but this is as close to whitehat as it gets without paying through the nose for posts on an actual live, active niche-specific pr5 blog.
value 5/5: even at full price (which isn't much more than review price), this is a steal. people are charging (and paying) more for non-hp posts on pr5s with a weaker profile.
overall 5/5: i think this is the first 5/5 overall review i've given. this is especially tough to do for a service like this because high quality posts on solid pr4+ blogs are so often marked up through the roof because the market is willing to pay for it. i'm actually regretting having to leave the review, because it decreases the chances of there still being a spot available next time i need a link like that
-p
speed 5/5: took a day or two, sadly can't remember now, but it was definitely on the quick side when it comes to writing a quality original post.
communication 5/5: didn't need any, which is good - we outsource because we're time-poor, having to spend any more time than you absolutely have to reduces the value of that. i'm sure communication would have been just fine if i had needed it.
quality 5/5: backlink profile looks fine and supports the pr value; i've seen more solid ones on pr5s (more recognizable authorities linking in, eg .govs and .edus linking to a defunct charity, say), but at considerably higher pricepoints and quite rarely. this kind of profile is also considerably more likely to stick in the long term. a lot of previous posts have pr4, so i'm confident i'm getting plenty of juice and it demonstrates that the site made it through the last pr update intact.
the post was excellent. the writing was very good and he even managed to use an unnatural anchor in a sentence (not going to out, obviously, but think 'keyword keyword city' where people would normally say 'keyword keyword in city' or 'city keyword keyword'), which i wasn't expecting.
the quality is actually consistent throughout the blog. all the posts are written in a style that makes it as difficult as possible to definitively determine that these are seo posts (not going to say exactly what that is because it's a competitive advantage for a provider). obviously, there's a limit to how far you can get with that, but this is as close to whitehat as it gets without paying through the nose for posts on an actual live, active niche-specific pr5 blog.
value 5/5: even at full price (which isn't much more than review price), this is a steal. people are charging (and paying) more for non-hp posts on pr5s with a weaker profile.
overall 5/5: i think this is the first 5/5 overall review i've given. this is especially tough to do for a service like this because high quality posts on solid pr4+ blogs are so often marked up through the roof because the market is willing to pay for it. i'm actually regretting having to leave the review, because it decreases the chances of there still being a spot available next time i need a link like that
-p
i got a review copy, received my report yesterday and here i am. if you've read any of my other reviews, you know i don't say nice things just because i get a freebie or a discount.
speed 5/5: took a day or two, sadly can't remember now, but it was definitely on the quick side when it comes to writing a quality original post.
communication 5/5: didn't need any, which is good - we outsource because we're time-poor, having to spend any more time than you absolutely have to reduces the value of that. i'm sure communication would have been just fine if i had needed it.
quality 5/5: backlink profile looks fine and supports the pr value; i've seen more solid ones on pr5s (more recognizable authorities linking in, eg .govs and .edus linking to a defunct charity, say), but at considerably higher pricepoints and quite rarely. this kind of profile is also considerably more likely to stick in the long term. a lot of previous posts have pr4, so i'm confident i'm getting plenty of juice and it demonstrates that the site made it through the last pr update intact.
the post was excellent. the writing was very good and he even managed to use an unnatural anchor in a sentence (not going to out, obviously, but think 'keyword keyword city' where people would normally say 'keyword keyword in city' or 'city keyword keyword'), which i wasn't expecting.
the quality is actually consistent throughout the blog. all the posts are written in a style that makes it as difficult as possible to definitively determine that these are seo posts (not going to say exactly what that is because it's a competitive advantage for a provider). obviously, there's a limit to how far you can get with that, but this is as close to whitehat as it gets without paying through the nose for posts on an actual live, active niche-specific pr5 blog.
value 5/5: even at full price (which isn't much more than review price), this is a steal. people are charging (and paying) more for non-hp posts on pr5s with a weaker profile.
overall 5/5: i think this is the first 5/5 overall review i've given. this is especially tough to do for a service like this because high quality posts on solid pr4+ blogs are so often marked up through the roof because the market is willing to pay for it. i'm actually regretting having to leave the review, because it decreases the chances of there still being a spot available next time i need a link like that
-p
Thank you for the incredible + thorough review paulieg.
- Status