Obama's gun control plans weaken in Senate



Yes, a minor victory for now...

I'm more concerned with that the idiots in the California legislature plan on doing. After New York one-upped California by limiting guns to 7 rounds each, several libtard lawmakers from Northern California began drafting up bills to require gun owners to have to buy a permit and insurance to buy ammunition, and other shit.
 
Yeah, I think it's a red herring.

We'll see what laws actually pass. I have a feeling that while we're celebrating the "right" to keep our "assault weapons" we'll be subjected to a lot more control as a "compromise".
 
My guess is they never expected the "assault weapon" ban to pass and were only looking for a national gun registry for future confiscations. Trying to confiscate guns after a school shooting would never work but when the shit hits the fan and there is civil unrest 90% of the sheep will go along with it.
 
ObamaLOL.gif
 
In the UK we're only able to own these guns.. If we use it in the open we'll get shot as it'll be mistaken for a firearm!

potato%20gun%20med.jpg
 
They're just playing politics. They knew it wasn't going to pass. Now they can submit something a little less draconian and give off the illusion of compromise.
 
Lol. His plan worked. He single handedly killed firearms ownership for future generations. Everyone has already forgotten about the executive orders. You know the ones where the .gov is now required to brainwash future generations about the evils of guns.

Coming to a doctor or school near you
 
Coming to a doctor or school near you

Already seeing it's appearances, at least the initial probing forays. Of more immediate concern is the switch to this Common Core bullshit. Way to create a generation (or more) of even dumber sheep. Well played.
 
My guess is they never expected the "assault weapon" ban to pass and were only looking for a national gun registry for future confiscations. Trying to confiscate guns after a school shooting would never work but when the shit hits the fan and there is civil unrest 90% of the sheep will go along with it.

I might be misunderstanding your point but I would think it the other way around to an extent. After a school shooting the bleeding hearts might be more likely to get rid of their guns for the children but in a situation of civil unrest be less likely when they need them to protect their families and property. However, dedicated supporters aren't likely giving up their guns either way.
 
I might be misunderstanding your point but I would think it the other way around to an extent. After a school shooting the bleeding hearts might be more likely to get rid of their guns for the children but in a situation of civil unrest be less likely when they need them to protect their families and property. However, dedicated supporters aren't likely giving up their guns either way.

This is why I say it's a red herring.

The assault weapons aspect was a distraction. Now whatever they pass can look like a "compromise" between both sides and most people, even those who oppose gun control, will see it as a political victory.

Meanwhile they push through national registration. In a SHTF situation it's a lot easier to go door to door confiscating guns when you've got a list of everyone who owns one.
 
I might be misunderstanding your point but I would think it the other way around to an extent. After a school shooting the bleeding hearts might be more likely to get rid of their guns for the children but in a situation of civil unrest be less likely when they need them to protect their families and property. However, dedicated supporters aren't likely giving up their guns either way.

I think most people will trust their government to have the guns more than their fellow neighbors when the unrest comes. It's a scary thought, but people have been conditioned so well now that they fear their neighbor more than they fear their government.

We saw a trial run of it in New Orleans after Katrina. The police went door to door confiscating weapons and despite some protests from legal gun owners the majority feeling of the population as a whole was "they're just doing it to keep us all safe".

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kf8trl69kzo"]Hurricane Katrina Door to Door Firearms Confiscation - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1Qx0cTze0M"]Hurricane Katrina Firearms Confiscation - YouTube[/ame]

Meanwhile, the roving bands of looters didn't get the memo because they kept their guns.
 
I think most people will trust their government to have the guns more than their fellow neighbors when the unrest comes. It's a scary thought, but people have been conditioned so well now that they fear their neighbor more than they fear their government.

We saw a trial run of it in New Orleans after Katrina. The police went door to door confiscating weapons and despite some protests from legal gun owners the majority feeling of the population as a whole was "they're just doing it to keep us all safe".

Hurricane Katrina Door to Door Firearms Confiscation - YouTube

Hurricane Katrina Firearms Confiscation - YouTube

Meanwhile, the roving bands of looters didn't get the memo because they kept their guns.

As if that officers name was Fred Bible.
 
This is why I say it's a red herring.

The assault weapons aspect was a distraction. Now whatever they pass can look like a "compromise" between both sides and most people, even those who oppose gun control, will see it as a political victory.

Meanwhile they push through national registration. In a SHTF situation it's a lot easier to go door to door confiscating guns when you've got a list of everyone who owns one.

You don't get it. The damage was done in those EO's. yes the ban was a distraction. 99% of the gun supporters thinks we won, nothing to worry about. The country has already forgotten those executive orders. 1 maybe 2 generations from now they won't need to ban guns. Doctors will be asking kids about guns in the home. Schools are going to "educate" the children about the evils of guns. They did the same with cigarettes. I graduated high school in the mid 90's, students could smoke in the building's designated areas. Now cigarettes are a dirty word. The only place people can smoke is their cars because they don't want anyone to know. Dirty smokers.

Democracy is a lot easier when people decide for the,selves that something is evil. After a generation or 2 of brainwashing people will gladly turn in their guns. Be afraid, be very afraid
 
You don't get it. The damage was done in those EO's. yes the ban was a distraction. 99% of the gun supporters thinks we won, nothing to worry about. The country has already forgotten those executive orders. 1 maybe 2 generations from now they won't need to ban guns. Doctors will be asking kids about guns in the home. Schools are going to "educate" the children about the evils of guns. They did the same with cigarettes. I graduated high school in the mid 90's, students could smoke in the building's designated areas. Now cigarettes are a dirty word. The only place people can smoke is their cars because they don't want anyone to know. Dirty smokers.

Democracy is a lot easier when people decide for the,selves that something is evil. After a generation or 2 of brainwashing people will gladly turn in their guns. Be afraid, be very afraid

Cigarettes are a whole different story... you're saying it's a bad thing to stigmatize cancer sticks?