One of a Kind Automated Backlinking Service!

Status
Not open for further replies.
When you emailed me last night, I got back to you in 14 minutes. You're mail was sent to me at 11:17 PM amd I returned it at 11:31 PM.

I have always respond to emails in a very timely manner.

Email or skype is the fastest way to get us as we are not always on this forum.

You sure did. I will remember to contact you via email next time - thanks!
 


From the 11AM ranking this morning. exact search 22,000 broad 135,000. Competition is 5,950,000 with "" and 6,170,000 without "".


Keith4-1.jpg


March 21st I was @ #37 in Google for the KW
March 28th I was at #17 in Google for the KW.
April 6th I was at #16 in Google
April 11th I am at #14 in Google.

Nothing yet in Bing which I am really surprised about because Bing usually responds very favorably to Linkpushes.

The past week I have not done any exact match KW pushes for this and have focused only Long Tail versions of this KW.

You can see by the graph that it has been dancing a lot (I don't know when SEscout put a point on the graph for the day but my KW has been ranking for the most part). The highest that I have seen is #12 but it's usually in the higher teens or low 20's. Sometimes bouncing to the 30's or out all together.

I am now starting to see traffic to my website from this KW but l am really excited to see the crazy traffic from the first page of Google when I get there in the next few weeks.
 
Our keyword data is straight from google. We grab "EXACT" match data and not "broad". "Broad" match includes every variation of your keyword... not exactly helpful when you are targeting a specific search. Always keep that in mind when doing keyword research.

My bad. I totally agree with you after reading your explanation and Google's definitions of the terms. When using their KW tool they default it to the broad results.

By the way your Service rocks, when I manually check the SERPS your ranking and the manual rankings are usually 99% of the time the same rankings.
 
i just ordered under username eliquid.. paid for 20 link pushes and it says I cant add a push now that my limit has been reached, but I just paid and havent had any...
 
Guys, go for this one!
I just want to say this is by far the best service i ever went for. I am competing for a very heavy keyword and only after 15 pushes my site jumped from 90 to spot 30.

Greg is an excellent guy to work with and very honest which these days is very rare.
If you are serious in terms of backlinking then this is the deal you will go with.


A++ and top rating for this service.
 
Willing to give it another try since you say more of the bugs have been worked out... do you still have a coupon for WF members?
 
Guys, go for this one!
I just want to say this is by far the best service i ever went for. I am competing for a very heavy keyword and only after 15 pushes my site jumped from 90 to spot 30.

Greg is an excellent guy to work with and very honest which these days is very rare.
If you are serious in terms of backlinking then this is the deal you will go with.


A++ and top rating for this service.

Just looking for more insight on use. 15 simultaneous on the same keyword or over time or ???

I read the best practices guide but would be interested to see more input on implementation.
 
Does anyone have the same issues as I have? The number of links from each link push is getting less and less. Check the recent linkpushes:

Web 2.0 Posts (10)
Private Network Posts (16)
Article Tier 1 Posts (2)
Bookmarks (10)
Article Tier 2 Posts (8)
Doc Share Posts (3)
Microblogging Posts (6)

Web 2.0 Posts (11)
Private Network Posts (16)
Article Tier 1 Posts (1)
Bookmarks (8)
Article Tier 2 Posts (8)
Doc Share Posts (4)
Microblogging Posts (3)

Web 2.0 Posts (10)
Article Tier 1 Posts (1)
Bookmarks (11)
Article Tier 2 Posts (7)
Doc Share Posts (3)
Microblogging Posts (4)

and the worst one

Web 2.0 Posts (4)
Article Tier 1 Posts (1)
Bookmarks (9)
Article Tier 2 Posts (10)
Doc Share Posts (3)
Microblogging Posts (3)

The tier1 posts are almost non existent, web2.0 posts are significantly reduced and blog posts are not always there. Disappointing. Low number of links ever since I joined Linkpushing and I am one of the early members, its getting worse.
 
There are still going to be some failed postings but we have it at about 97% clean now with some of the changes we have done.


My pushed for the last three months are pretty much worthless and about half the first tier of links are no good, not founds, or errors, so the second and third tiers are linking to bad links.

What is going to be done to rectify all the lost work, links and money on these?

Also I don't seem to use all my pushes every month, so I want to know if they are accruing some where so one month I can go over and use all the pushes I have paid for or do I just lose them?
 
I have seen the same. On some pushes we get a decent amount on others they are down 75% from the norm. I see no rhyme or reason as to why.

We have been on this service for several months and won the Super Bowl promotion (sign up), I have seen good results with it when the links are boosted with DFB. There is of course a much less effect on the pushes with a low # of links to backup.

One thing you may want to try is providing an article and picking the sites yourself. This eliminates some of the ease of the service but you seem to get more links that way at least from what I have seen on my account.

I would like a response as well as to what the min number of links we can expect to see from pushes and what can be done to avoid the low link count pushes?
 
So, what's the current state of affairs? I like the offering, but with negative feedback piled up - I am reluctant...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.