Eh I suppose so. But the first one may have been the person who introduced the brand into the mind of the user. The user frequently will the search for the brand name and whatnot after seeing an ad by the first guy. The sale is more or less assured in most cases, but that second aff picks up the commission? ehhh. Maybe. Tricky question.I'd say: THE LAST
Because his marketing was the one which actually triggered off the purchase![]()
In most cases this is presumed to be correct.I'd say: THE LAST
Because his marketing was the one which actually triggered off the purchase![]()
It's tricky and can be argued either way. One might say the 1st needs to convert better or make it easier to bookmark or save the site/location for later, and some might say the 2nd got lucky, even if they had the more convincing ad campaign.Eh I suppose so. But the first one may have been the person who introduced the brand into the mind of the user. The user frequently will the search for the brand name and whatnot after seeing an ad by the first guy. The sale is more or less assured in most cases, but that second aff picks up the commission? ehhh. Maybe. Tricky question.