Yes, I occasionally read Alex Jones' news sites. I know a lot of you are skeptical about his viewpoints, which is fine, but I'd ask you to leave those issues aside regarding this article, as it is a considerably poignant overview of new internet/advertising guidelines being proposed by the FTC.
Here's a brief excerpt of one of the examples from the proposed guidelines document, page 70:“New guidelines, expected to be approved late this summer with possible modifications, would clarify that the agency can go after bloggers — as well as the companies that compensate them — for any false claims or failure to disclose conflicts of interest,” states an Associated Press report.
Source: Feds To Get Power To Target Websites Making “False Claims”
Thoughts?"Example 5: A skin care products advertiser participates in a blog advertising service. The service matches up advertisers with bloggers who will promote the advertiser’s products on their personal blogs. The advertiser requests that a blogger try a new body lotion and write a review of the product on her blog. Although the advertiser does not make any specific claims about the lotion’s ability to cure skin conditions and the blogger does not ask the advertiser whether there is substantiation for the claim, in her review the blogger writes that the lotion cures eczema and recommends the product to her blog readers who suffer from this condition. The advertiser is subject to liability for false or unsubstantiated statements made through the blogger’s endorsement. The blogger also is subject to liability for representations made in the course of her endorsement. The blogger is also liable if she fails to disclose clearly and conspicuously that she is being paid for her services. [See § 255.5.]"
(emphasis added by me)
The FTC's document, PDF: http://www.ftc.gov/os/2008/11/P034520endorsementguides.pdf