Sick Submitter



High learning curve (at least for me)

Bad tutorials (again... at least for me)

Hidden costs:
If you don't scrape and build your own lists or purchase them the default ones are very whored out (since everyone else who doesn't scrape and build their own lists blasts to them).


That said.... I like it =)

It's not full service like SENukeX..... its like scrapebox for articles, directories, bookmarks, etc. ... you provide the list the software can do the work at about 50% success rate


.
 
The basic program is OK. But you need templates for submission. The ones that are free are OK but you get a higher success rate with custom.
 
I know about building my own lists, but I'm not sure what you mean by custom submission templates...can you explain?

In their forum they talk about a submit template and up dating them. I have not run Sick though once I had subscription but did not have time. Once I get more time and better cash flow for a decent Windows VPS will get it again. I believe the template is describes where the log in and account setting is as each platform is different. Hit their support forum. Just Google Sick Submitter
 
just scraped my own pligg list of about 2,000 pligg sites, with PLIGGROBOT I was able ot get about 500 or so bookmarks. Captcha cost are insane, but soon my captchasniper will support recaptcha. Haven't been using the app for more than 24 hours, so I don't know what learning curve there is, I'm not genius when it comes to pushing buttons, all you have to do is keep working at it until you get results.
 
Forgot to include that I'm using Sick Submitter with PLIGGROBOT template. Shit's in fucking beast mode right now
 
just scraped my own pligg list of about 2,000 pligg sites, with PLIGGROBOT I was able ot get about 500 or so bookmarks. Captcha cost are insane, but soon my captchasniper will support recaptcha. Haven't been using the app for more than 24 hours, so I don't know what learning curve there is, I'm not genius when it comes to pushing buttons, all you have to do is keep working at it until you get results.

Is Captcha Sniper any good? I was thinking of giving it a try. I have blown some serious money paying to captcha services? Is the Captcha sniper work equatable
to those monthly services ones? What's the chances of success?
 
Is Captcha Sniper any good? I was thinking of giving it a try. I have blown some serious money paying to captcha services? Is the Captcha sniper work equatable
to those monthly services ones? What's the chances of success?

I would get captcha sniper before recaptcha is supported as the OP stated that the price will increase. It does work, not 100% but I ran it with scrapebox and amr with decent results. I have two licenses of it and I'm pretty happy with it overall. I still need to use deathbycaptcha for sick submitter and a few other tools.
 
I would get captcha sniper before recaptcha is supported as the OP stated that the price will increase. It does work, not 100% but I ran it with scrapebox and amr with decent results. I have two licenses of it and I'm pretty happy with it overall. I still need to use deathbycaptcha for sick submitter and a few other tools.

breaking recaptcha is not trivial. it's far from a given that they will succeed. even if they do, 'breaking' a captcha technically just means a statistically valid increase over the correctness rate produced by randomly guessing, even if that's 1%. i've seen references to a break implementation with about 15% correctness, which is somewhat useful but not unequivocally sufficient for every application. besides that, all it takes is for g to tweak recaptcha again; an easy way would be to make the non-mandatory google books ocr sourced word look similar to the mandatory well-known value word to break the classifiers that distinguish them

-p
 
breaking recaptcha is not trivial. it's far from a given that they will succeed. even if they do, 'breaking' a captcha technically just means a statistically valid increase over the correctness rate produced by randomly guessing, even if that's 1%. i've seen references to a break implementation with about 15% correctness, which is somewhat useful but not unequivocally sufficient for every application. besides that, all it takes is for g to tweak recaptcha again; an easy way would be to make the non-mandatory google books ocr sourced word look similar to the mandatory well-known value word to break the classifiers that distinguish them

-p

I didn't understand. How your explanation help solve the problem? Please simplify
 
breaking recaptcha is not trivial. it's far from a given that they will succeed. even if they do, 'breaking' a captcha technically just means a statistically valid increase over the correctness rate produced by randomly guessing, even if that's 1%. i've seen references to a break implementation with about 15% correctness, which is somewhat useful but not unequivocally sufficient for every application. besides that, all it takes is for g to tweak recaptcha again; an easy way would be to make the non-mandatory google books ocr sourced word look similar to the mandatory well-known value word to break the classifiers that distinguish them

-p

We will see, if not it was a good run. They just updated recaptcha and they are working to make their changes now I guess. Fingers crossed,