You're making a diet ad and the girl doesn't look slim enough? Fire up Photoshop.
You're Apple, and you're suing Samsung over how the Galaxy S and Galaxy Tab look exactly like iPhone and iPad, but they really don't? Fire up Photoshop. Then proceed to submit said shopped creatives as evidence in a lawsuit.
via Apple’s Evidence In European Galaxy Tab Injunction Was Seriously Misleading… As In False | TechCrunch
And then:
You're not alone, bros.
You're Apple, and you're suing Samsung over how the Galaxy S and Galaxy Tab look exactly like iPhone and iPad, but they really don't? Fire up Photoshop. Then proceed to submit said shopped creatives as evidence in a lawsuit.
According to Dutch IDG publication Webwereld.nl, the image used for a side-by-side comparison between the iPad 2 and the GalTab 10.1 is either wrong or manipulated. On page 28 of Apple’s filing, the image of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 has been cropped and the image ratio has been tampered with.
Whether the deception was intentional or not, “complete and truthful” evidence is a requirement in the German court system. At a surface level, this doesn’t look good for Apple. It’s entirely possible that the picture they used of the GalTab was an outdated pre-release image. Even so, the fact that false evidence was submitted at all makes Apple look sneaky and weak.
via Apple’s Evidence In European Galaxy Tab Injunction Was Seriously Misleading… As In False | TechCrunch
And then:
via Apple’s “Inaccurate Evidence” Debacle, Part 2: Smartphone Edition | TechCrunchSamsung’s lawyers claim that Apple did manipulate evidence, since this time Samsung actually got to be a part of the court proceedings. “[Apple has been] manipulating visual evidence, making Samsung’s devices appear more similar to Apple’s,” said Bas Berghuis of Simmons and Simmons law firm.
You're not alone, bros.